Skip to main content

Familial Relationships

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Psychology ((EVOLPSYCH))

Abstract

Kinship has been a central organizing principle in evolutionary explorations of social behavior ever since Hamilton (J Theor Biol 7:1–52, 1964) extended the concept of Darwinian fitness benefits to include actions that benefit not only own offspring but also collateral kin. This insight into humans as nepotistic strategists has fueled an extensive literature on the adaptations that make up the repertoire that is our family psychology from those that shape mothers’ and fathers’ substantial investment in offspring, to parent–offspring conflict over the allocation of investment, to sibling conflict and cooperation, and the valuable investment that some grandparents make to the survival and success of their grandchildren. No understanding of social behavior can be complete without understanding where it all starts: with the families we grow up in.

Our most basic instinct is not for survival but for family. Most of us would give our own life for the survival of a family member, yet we lead our daily life too often as if we take our family for granted.

Paul Pearshall

The great advantage of living in a large family is that early lesson of life’s essential unfairness.

Nancy Mitford

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almond, D., & Edlund, L. (2007). Trivers–Willard at birth and one year: Evidence from US natality data 1983–2001. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 274, 2491–2496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvergne, A., Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2007). Differential facial resemblance of young children to their parents: Who do children look like more? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvergne, A., Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2010). Are parents’ perceptions of offspring facial resemblance consistent with actual resemblance? Effects on parental investment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. G., Kaplan, K., & Lancaster, J. B. (2006). Demographic correlates of paternity confidence and pregnancy outcomes among Albuquerque men. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 131, 560–571.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Apicella, C. L., & Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Perceived mate fidelity and paternal resemblance predict men’s investment in children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 371–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apicella, C. L., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Men’s reproductive investment decisions. Mating, parenting and self-perceived mate value. Human Nature, 18, 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azmitia, M., & Hesser, J. (1993). Why siblings are important agents of cognitive development: A comparison of siblings and peers. Child Development, 64, 430–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu, D. A., & Bugental, D. (2008). Contingent parental investment: An evolutionary framework for understanding early interaction between mothers and children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, F. B., Widdig, A. & Nurnberg, P. (2000). Maternal investment in rhesus Macaques ( Macaca mulatto): Reproductive costs and consequences on raising sons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereczkei, T., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1997). Female-biased reproductive strategies in a Hungarian Gypsy population. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B, 264, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereczkei, T., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2002). Helping-at-the-nest and sex-biased parental investment in a Hungarian Gypsy population. Current Anthropology, 43, 804–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. I., Meyer, B. C., Schmidt, T. M., & Gray, B. R. (2009). Differential investment behavior between grandparents and grandchildren. The role of paternity uncertainty. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressan, P. (2002). Why babies look like their daddies: Paternity uncertainty and the evolution of self-deception in evaluating family resemblance. Acta Ethologica, 4, 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressan, P., & Grassi, M. (2004). Parental resemblance in 1-year-olds and the Gaussian curve. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., MacKinnon, C. E., & MacKinnon, R. (1985). Role relationships and behaviors between preschool-aged and school-aged sibling pairs. Developmental Psychology, 21, 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., & McCoy, J. K. (1992a). Associations of maternal and paternal direct and differential behavior with sibling relationships: Contemporaneous and longitudinal analyses. Child Development, 63, 82–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., & McCoy, J. K. (1992b). Parental differential treatment of siblings and sibling differences in negative emotionality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 643–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, T. A., Metzger, B. E., Freinkel, N., & Bergman, R. N. (1990). Insulin sensitivity and B-cell responsiveness to glucose during late pregnancy in lean and moderately obese women with normal glucose tolerance or mild gestational diabetes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 162, 1008–1014.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bugental, D. B., Beaulieu, D. A., & Silbert-Geiger, A. (2010). Increases in parental investment and child health as a result of an early intervention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 30–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 773–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary Psychology: The new science of the mind (1st ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, E. Z., & Dalerum, F. (2009). A Trivers-Willard effect in contemporary humans: Male-biased sex ratios among billionaires. PLoS ONE, 4, e4195.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campione-Barr, N., & Smetana, J. G. (2010). “Who said you could wear my sweater?” Adolescent siblings’ conflicts and association with relationship quality. Child Development, 81, 464–471.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, P. M., Tyzbir, E. D., Roman, N. M., Amini, S. B., & Sims, A. H. (1991). Longitudinal changes in insulin release and insulin resistance in nonobese pregnant women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 165, 1667–1672.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chacon Puignau, G. C., & Jaffe, K. (1996). Sex ratio at birth deviations in modern Venezuela: The Trivers-Willard effect. Social Biology, 43, 257–270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cicirelli, V. G. (1994). Sibling relationships in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicirelli, V. G. (1995). Sibling relationships across the life span. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (2004). Female post-reproductive lifespan: A general mammalian trait. Biological Reviews, 79, 733–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C. B. (1989). The theory of evolution: Of what value to psychology? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 4–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crognier, E., Baali, A. & Hilali, H. K. (2001). Do “helpers at the nest” increase their parents’ reproductive success? American Journal of Human Biology, 13, 365–373.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crognier, E., Villena, M. & Vargas, E. (2002). Helping patterns and reproductive success in Aymara communities. American Journal of Human Biology, 14, 372–379.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, L. (1989). Low socioeconomic status and female-based parental investment: The Mokogodo example. American Anthropologist, 91, 414–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, L. (2007). Boy or girl: Gender preferences from a Darwinian point of view. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 15, 23–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1982). Whom are newborn babies said to resemble? Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1985). Child abuse and other risks of not living with both parents. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 197–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1995). Discriminative parental solicitude and the relevance of evolutionary models to the analysis of motivational systems. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1269–1286). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1998). The truth about Cinderella: A Darwinian view of parental love. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., Salmon, C. A., & Wilson, M. (1997). Kinship: The conceptual hole in psychological studies of social cognition and close relationships. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 265–296). Mahweh: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKay, W. T. (1995, July). Grandparent investment and the uncertainty of kinship. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Santa Barbara, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickemann, M. (1979). Female infanticide, reproductive strategies, and social stratification: A preliminary model. In N. A. Chagnon & W. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary Biology and human social behavior (pp. 321–367). North Scituate: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., & Kendrick, C. (1982). Siblings: Love, envy, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., & Munn, P. (1987). The development of justifications in disputes. Developmental Psychology, 23, 791–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euler, H. (2011). Grandparents and extended kin. In C. Salmon & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euler, H., & Weitzel, B. (1996). Discriminative grandparental solicitude as reproductive strategy. Human Nature, 7, 39–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, G. L., & Bruce, C. (2001). Conditional fatherhood: Identity theory and parental investment theory as alternative sources of explanation of fathering. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 394–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., & Robbins, C. J. (1991). Trivers-Willard effect in contemporary North American society. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 85, 61–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, M. A., & Mace, R. (2003). Strong mothers bear more sons in rural Ethiopia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, S108–S109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P. R., & Grant, R. (2011). How and why species multiply: The radiation of Darwin’s finches. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. B., & Anderson, K. G. (2010). Fatherhood: Evolution and human paternal behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guggenheim, C. B., Davis, M. F., & Figueredo, A. J. (2004). Sons or daughters: A cross-cultural study of sex ratio biasing and differential parental investment. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science, 39, 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, D. (1987). Selective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab. Population and Development Review, 13, 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig, D. (1993). Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 68, 495–532.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R. D., & Draper, P. (2004). Women’s work, childcare and helpers at the nest in a traditional hunter–gatherer society. Human Nature, 15, 319–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1966). The moulding of senescence by natural selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 12, 12–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., O'Connell, J. F., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (1989). Hardworking Hadza grandmothers. In V. Standen & R. A. Foley (Eds.), Comparative socioecology: The behavioural ecology of humans and other mammals (pp. 341–366). London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., Blurton Jones, N. G., Alvarez, H., & Charnov, E. L. (1998). Grandmothering, menopause, and the evolution of human life histories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 95, 1336–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., O'Connell, K. J. F., Blurton-Jones, N. G., Alvarez, H., & Charnov, E. (2000). The grandmother hypothesis and human evolution. In L. Cronk, N. Chagnon, & W. Irons (Eds.), Adaptation and human behavior: An anthropological perspective (pp. 237–258). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, M. D., & Ellis, B. J. (2007). Birth order, conscientiousness, and openness to experience: Tests of the family-niche model of personality using a within-family methodology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M. (1988). Parents, children, and siblings: Six years after divorce. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Relationships within families: Mutual influences (pp. 311–331). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (1992). Fitness tradeoffs in the history and evolution of delegated mothering with special reference to wet-nursing, abandonment, and infanticide. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 409–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother Nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (2005). Evolutionary context of human development: The cooperative breeding model. In S. C. Carter, L. Ahnert, K. Grossman, S. B. Hrdy, M. E. Lamb, S. W. Porges, & N. Sachser (Eds.), Attachment and bonding: A new synthesis (pp. 9–32). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., & Keefe, R. C. (1998). Evolutionary cognitive psychology: The missing heart of modern cognitive science. In C. Crawford & D. Krebs (Eds.), Evolution and Human Behavior: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 485–514). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laham, S. M., Gonsalkorale, K., & von Hippel, W. (2005). Darwinian grandparenting: Preferential investment in more certain kin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 63–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lahdenperä, M., Lummaa, V., Helle, S., Tremblay, M., & Russell, A. F. (2004). Fitness benefits of prolonged post-reproductive lifespan in women. Nature, 428, 178–181.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, J. B., & King, B. J. (1985). An evolutionary perspective on menopause. In J. K. Brown & V. Kern (Eds.), In her prime: A new view of middle aged women (pp. 13–20). Boston: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, E. (1966). Virgin birth. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 1966, 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. J., & George, R. M. (1999). Poverty, early childbearing and child maltreatment: A multinomial analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 21, 755–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Chang, L. (2007). Paternal harsh parenting in relation to paternal versus child characteristics: the moderating effect of paternal resemblance belief. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 495–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, S., Manke, B., Eftekhari, A., & Dunn, J. (2000). Children’s perceptions of sibling conflict during middle childhood: Issues and sibling (dis)similarity. Social Development, 9, 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain, D. K., Setters, D., Moulton, M. P., & Pratt, A. E. (2000). Ascription of resemblance of newborns by parents and nonrelatives. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, R. L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2005). Grandparental investment as a function of relational uncertainty and emotional closeness with parents. Human Nature, 16, 292–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, T. L., Wakeman, M. A. & Fea, C. B. (2001). Adult grandchildren’s perceptions of emotional closeness and consensus with their maternal and paternal grandparents. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 427–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock, D. W., & Parker, G. A. (1997). The evolution of sibling rivalry. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monserud, M. A. (2008). Intergenerational relationships and affectual solidarity between grandparents and young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 182–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomerie, R. D., & Weatherhead, P. J. (1988). Risks and rewards of nest defense by parent birds. Quarterly Review of Biology, 63, 167–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyer, F. J., & Lang, F. R. (2003). Blood is thicker than water. Kinship orientation across adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 310–321.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Overpeck, M. D., Brenner, R. A., Trumble, A. C., Trifiletti, L. B., & Berendes, H. W. (1998). Risk factors for infant homicide in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 1211–1216.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A., Mock, D. W., & Lamey, T. C. (1989). How selfish should stronger sibs be? American Naturalist, 133, 846–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashos, A. (2000). Does paternal uncertainty explain discriminative grandparental solicitude? A cross-cultural study in Greece and Germany. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 97–109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peccei, J. S. (2001). A critique of the grandmother hypotheses: Old and new. American Journal of Human Biology, 13, 434–452.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V. (2007). Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 176–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V., & Hoben, A. D. (2011). An evolutionary perspective on siblings: Rivals and resources. In C. Salmon & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (pp. 128–148). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V., & Nettle, D. (2007). Birth order and face-to-face contact with a sibling: firstborns have more contact than laterborns. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1796–1806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V., & Nettle, D. (2009). Birth order and family relationships in adult life: Firstborns report better sibling relationships than laterborns. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 1029–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V., Nettle, D., & Nelissen, M. (2006). Contact frequencies between grandparents and grandchildren in a modern society: Estimates of the impact of paternity uncertainty. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V., Nettle, D., & Nelissen, M. (2007). Maternal grandmothers do go the extra mile: Factoring distance and lineage into differential contact with grandchildren. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 832–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V., Nelissen, M., & Nettle, D. (2008). Lineage based differences in grandparental investment: Evidence from a large British cohort study. Journal of Biosocial Science, 41, 355–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regalski, J. M., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (1993). Whom are Mexican infant said to resemble? Monitoring and fostering paternal confidence in the Yucatan. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, P. A., Atzwanger, K., Butovskaya, M., Lampert, A., Mysterud, I., Sanchez-Andres, A., & Sulloway, F. (2003). Perceived parental favoritism, closeness to kin, and the rebel of the family: The effects of sex and birth order. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 261–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. A. (1999). On the impact of sex and birth order on contact with kin. Human Nature, 10, 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. A. (2003). Birth order and relationships: Family, friends and sexual partners. Human Nature, 14, 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. A., & Daly, M. (1998). Birth order and familial sentiment: Middleborns are different. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 299–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. A., & Hehman, J. (2013). The evolutionary psychology of sibling conflict and siblicide. In T. K. Shackelford & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution of violence (pp. 137–158). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, H. R. (1980). The effect of an older sibling on infant locomotor exploration of a new environment. Child Development, 51, 607–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sear, R., Mace, R., & McGregor, I. A. (2000). Maternal grandmothers improve nutritional status and survival of children in rural Gambia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 267, 1641–1647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, N. L. (2005). Evolutionary studies of cooperation, competition, and altruism: A twin-based approach. In R. L. Burgess & K. B. MacDonald (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human development (2nd ed., pp. 265–304). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieff, D. F. (1990). Explaining biased gender ratios in human populations. Current Anthropology, 31, 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. S. (1988). Research in developmental sociobiology: Parenting and family behavior. In K. MacDonald (Ed.), Sociobiological perspectives on human development (pp. 271–292). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. S., Kish, B. J., & Crawford, C. B. (1987). Inheritance of wealth and human kin investment. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. B., & Marvin, R. S. (1984). Sibling relations: The role of conceptual perspective taking in the ontogeny of sibling caregiving. Child Development, 55, 1322–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (2006). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulloway, F. J. (1982). Darwin and his finches: The evolution of a legend. Journal of the History of Biology, 15, 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics and creative lives. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulloway, F. J. (1999). Birth order. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity volume 1 (pp. 189–202). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulloway, F. J. (2001). Birth order, sibling competition, and human behavior. In H. R. Holcomb III (Ed.), Conceptual challenges in evolutionary psychology: Innovative research strategies (pp. 39–83). Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallarigo, L., Giampietro, O., Penno, G., Miccoli, R., Gregori, G., & Navalesi, R. (1986). Relation of glucose tolerance to complications of pregnancy in nondiabetic women. New England Journal of Medicine, 316, 1343–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. (1980). Rape in Panorpa scorpionflies and a general rape hypothesis. Animal Behavior, 28, 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Alcock, J. (1983). The evolution of insect mating systems. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Sauer, P. (1992). Genetic sire effects on the fighting ability of sons and daughters and mating success of sons in a scorpionfly. Animal Behavior, 43, 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L., & Willard, D. (1973). Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex-ratio of offspring. Science, 179, 90–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turke, P. W. (1988). Helpers at the nest: childcare networks on Ifaluk. In L. L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. W. Turke (Eds.) Human reproductive behaviour (pp. 178–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenberg, P., & Hammill, B. G. (1998). Frequency of grandparental contact with grandchild sets: Six factors that make a difference. The Gerontologist, 38, 276–285.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voland, E. (1998). Evolutionary ecology of human reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27, 347–374.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voland, E., & Gabler, S. (1994). Differential twin mortality indicates a correlation between age and parental effort in humans. Naturwissenschaften, 81, 224–225.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voland, E., Dunbar, R. I. M., Engel, C., & Stephan, P. (1997). Population increase and sex-biased parental investment in humans: Evidence from 18th and 19th century Germany. Current Anthropology, 38, 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voland, E., Chasiotis, A., & Schiefenhövel, W. (Eds.). (2005). Grandmotherhood. The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volk, A., & Quinsey, V. L. (2002). The influence of infant facial cues on adoption preferences. Human Nature, 13, 437–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (2001). Sibling relationships over the life course: A panel analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 555–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfenden, G. E., & Fitzpatrick, J. W. (1984). The Florida scrub jay: Demography of a cooperative-breeding bird. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Salmon Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salmon, C. (2015). Familial Relationships. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Welling, L., Shackelford, T. (eds) Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology. Evolutionary Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics