Abstract
The Sociology of the Professions is a domain within the Sociology of Work whose object is the study of professions as a special category of occupations. The distinction between “profession” and “occupation”—its Anglo-Saxon starting point—is thus understood: while the term “occupation” means every activity, work, function or job that is the main source of someone’s livelihood, the term “profession” distinguishes a more or less specialized, well-paid and prestigious occupation. The main approaches and theories in the field of the Sociology of the Professions are the following: functionalist (“trait approach”), interactionist (“process approach”) and conflict (“power approach”). I submit that every lawful occupation, by means of which individuals earn their principal regular income, is their profession, with its corresponding utility and dignity, whatever its reality. Nevertheless, while a case may be made for considering the distinction between profession and occupation as a socially elitist construct, there are objective differences and social differentiation among occupations/professions. Occupations distinguish themselves by their level of professionality (or professionhood). Professionalism is a more frequently used word, but their distinction and definitions are not well-established in the sociological literature. As understood here, professionality means the global profile of a profession, that is, everything distinguishing it from other occupational groups; professionalism means the practice of a profession according to its identity content, as described in Professional Standards. Ultimately, professionalism amounts to the unity of science, conscience and excellence. Professional Standards are principally standards for professional fitness, competence, education, practice and conduct. They should form the normative framework essential for accreditation of initial and continuing education, for registration and certification, for any possible disciplinary sanction, as well as for the periodic evaluation of performance. Another relevant sociological concept is that of professional self-regulation. It will be the focus of the third part of this study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For example: “The evidence gathered during the Review is unequivocal: while teachers are most often described as professional people, teaching is not a profession” (Ramsey 2000, p. 94).
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
Their characteristics are highlighted in the following definition used by the Netherlands’ Council for the Liberal Professions, on its web page:
The liberal profession is conducted on an individual and (economically) independent base, on which the individual professionals render intellectual services for which they are responsible (professional autonomy). The services are rendered in accordance with the profession’s particular authorities, the interests of the clients involved and the public interest (e.g. national health, legal aid). The professional conduct is subjected to national legislation or self-regulatory rules drafted by the professions’ associations that guarantee the quality, professionalism and the fiduciary relationship between the professional and its clients. The professionals are monitored by disciplinary proceedings and are sometimes subjected to governmental supervision. Professionals have completed an academic education (and in some cases an additional professional education) and are subject to permanent education programs.
Translated in www.eu-newgov.org/database/DELIV/DLTFIbD09d_Final_Chapters_on_self-regulation_The_Netherlands.pdf (p. 46).
- 7.
Justice Potter Stewart, Jacobellis v. State of Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 197 (1964) (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=usandvol=378andinvol=184).
References
Beaton, G. (2010). Why professionalism is still relevant. The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Law School, Legal studies research papers, No. 445. Retrieved January 2013, from www.professions.com.au/Files/Professionalism_Beaton.pdf
Dingwall, R. (2008). Essays on professions. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Dubar, C., & Tripier, P. (2009). Sociologie des professions. Paris: Armand Colin (first published in 1998).
Gorman, E., & Sandefur, R. (2011). ‘Golden age’, quiescence, and revival: How the sociology of professions became the study of knowledge-bases work. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 275–302. Retrieved January 2013, from www.virginia.edu/sociology/publications/faculty%20articles/Gorman-Articles/Gorman-SandefurWandO-Knowledge-BasedWork.pdf
Hamilton, N. (2008). Assessing professionalism: measuring progress in the formation of an ethical professional identity. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 5, 101–143 (Legal studies research paper series, 8–10). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1118204##
Hughes, E. Ch. (1958). Men and their work. Glencoe: The Free Press. https://ia700408.us.archive.org/23/items/mentheirwork00hugh/mentheirwork00hugh.pdf
Ingersoll, R., & Perda, D. (2008). The status of teaching as a profession. In J. Ballantine & J. Spade (Eds.), Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (pp. 106–118). Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press.
McRuer, J. Ch. (1968–1971). Report of the royal commission inquiry into civil rights: Report number one, (Vol. 3). Toronto: Queens’ Printer.
Ramsey, G. (2000). Quality matters: Revitalising teaching: Critical times, critical choices: Report of the review of teacher education, New South Wales. www.det.nsw.edu.au/teachrev/reports/reports.pdf
Reagan, T. (2010). The professional status of teaching. In The sage handbook of philosophy of education (Chap. 14). London: Sage Publications.
Sayer, J. (2000). The general teaching council. London: Cassell.
Spada. (2009). British professions today: The state of the sector. www.ukipg.org.uk/executive_group_resources/spada-british-professions-today.pdf
Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature. Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001330/133010e.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Monteiro, A.R. (2015). Sociology of the Professions. In: The Teaching Profession. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12130-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12130-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12129-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12130-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)