Abstract
The cost of carbon capture is a crucial factor for the deployment of the technologies in the electricity sector. In general, much higher electricity generation costs arise in case of carbon capture. With an increase of approximately 80 %, lignite-based CCS plants are particularly affected. The CO2 avoidance costs are € 34–38/tCO2 for lignite plants, € 41–48/tCO2 for hard coal plants, and with approx. € 67/tCO2 highest for natural gas plants. This depends on the lower level of CO2 avoided in case of gas-fired power plants. Only when the price of allowances rises to these levels will the use of CCS power plants be cost-effective.
However, capture plants must be refinanced through the electricity market, as long as other market design options, e.g. capacity market or feed-in-tariffs, don’t render possible returns. In general, the question arises as to the degree to which higher revenues due to merit order effects can cover the additional investment costs for capture plants and the subsequent transport and storage of CO2. With further increase of renewable energy, there is a danger that the power plant capacities of an existing fleet will be potentially underused. As a result, there would be a short-term cost recovery problem for fossil power plants. Regardless of the possible development of capacity markets, the comparatively high refinancing needs compared to conventional power plants will remain if capacity revenues are to be incorporated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
SETIS: SET-Plan Information System.
- 2.
SET-Plan: European Strategic Energy Technology Plan.
- 3.
The cost breakdown in Tzimas & Georgakaki reflects the situation up to 2007 (Tzimas and Georgakaki 2010).
- 4.
For the mathematical principles, see Appendix.
- 5.
For a differentiated analysis of transportation and infrastructure costs, see Chap. 9.
- 6.
The prioritization of feed-in from renewables is anchored in the legislation.
References
Achner S, Michels A, Nailis D, Ritzau M, Schuffelen L (2011) Kapazitätsmarkt. Rahmenannahmen, Notwendigkeit und Eckpunkte einer Ausgestaltung. Studie im Auftrag des Bundesverband Neuer Energieanbieter e.V. (bne). Aachen, http://www.neue-energieanbieter.de/data/uploads/20110907_bne_bet_studie_kapazitaetsmarkt_final.pdf. 15 Aug 2012: BET Aachen
Al-Juaied M, Whitmore A (2009) Realistic costs of carbon capture. Harvard Kennedy School, http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/19185/realistic_costs_of_carbon_capture.html. 15 Aug 2012
Berry D (2008) Investment risk of new coal-fired power plants. http://iowa.sierraclub.org/Energy. 9 Aug 2011
Böckers V, Giessing L, Haucap J, Heimeshoff U, Rösch J (2012) Braucht Deutschland einen Kapazitätsmarkt für Kraftwerke? Eine Analyse des deutschen Marktes für Stromerzeugung DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven, http://www.dice.hhu.de/fileadmin/redaktion/Fakultaeten/Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche_Fakultaet/DICE/Ordnungspolitische_Perspektiven/024_OP_Bo__ckers_Giessing_Haucap-Heimeshoff_Ro__sch.pdf. 15 Aug 2012, 24
Bode S, Groscurth H-M (2011) Die künftige Rolle von Gaskraftwerken in Deutschland. Hamburg, http://www.die-klima-allianz.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Klima-Allianz-Studie-Gaskraftwerke-Okt-2011.pdf. 15 Aug 2012: arrhenius Institut für Energie- und Klimapolitik
Brunekreeft G, Meyer R (2011) Kapitalkosten und Kraftwerksinvestitionen bei zunehmender Einspeisung aus erneuerbaren Energie – Die Diskussion um Kapazitätsmärkte. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik 60:62–73
Brunekreeft G, Damsgaard N, De Vries L, Fritz P, Meyer R (2011) A raw model for a North European capacity market. Elforsk rapport. http://www.elforsk.se/Programomraden/Anvandning/MarketDesign/Publications/2011/. 15 Aug 2012
Cramton P, Ockenfels A (2012) Economics and design of capacity markets for the power sector. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft 36(Jg): 113–134
ENCAP (2008) Reference cases and guidelines for technology concepts. refman.et-model.com. 15 Aug 2012
ENCAP (2009) Power systems evaluation and benchmarking. Public version. www.encapco2.org. 15 Aug 2012
ENTSO-E (2010) Ten-year network development plan 2010–2020, Brussels, https://www.entsoe.eu/system-development/tyndp/. 15 Aug 2012
ENTSO-E (2011a) Data portal CE – production. https://www.entsoe.eu/data-portal/production/Pages/default.aspx
ENTSO-E (2011b) NTC values [Online]. Available: https://www.entsoe.eu/resources/ntc-values/ntc-matrix. Accessed 2 Mar 2011
ENTSO-E (2012) Ten-year network development plan 2012 project for consultation, Brussels, https://www.entsoe.eu/system-development/tyndp/. 15 Aug 2012
ETP ZEP (2011) The costs of CO2 capture. http://www.zeroemissionsplatform.eu/library/publication/165-zep-cost-report-summary.html. 15 Aug 2012: European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants (ZEP)
EURELECTRIC (2010) Power statistics 2010 edition, Brussels, http://www.eurelectric.org/PowerStats2010/. 15 Aug 2012
EWI (2012) Untersuchungen zu einem zukunftsfähigen Strommarktdesign. In: Energiewirtschaftliches Institut UK (ed) Köln, www.ewi.uni-koeln.de. 15 Aug 2012: Energiewirtschaftliches Institut, Universität Köln
Global CCS Institute (2009) Strategic analysis of the global status of carbon capture and storage. Report 2: Economic assessment of carbon capture and storage technologies http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/. 15 Aug 2012: Global CCS Institute
Global CCS Institute (2011) Economic assessment of carbon capture and storage technologies. 2011 update. http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/. 15 Aug 2012: Global CCS Institute
Hake J-F, Hansen P, Heckler R, Linßen J, Markewitz P, Martinsen D, Weber K (2009) Projektionsrechnungen bis 2050 für das Energiesystem von Deutschland im Rahmen des VDI-Projektes “Future Climate Engineering Solutions”. STE research report, 03/2009
Holt N, Booras G (2007) Updated cost and performance estimates for clean coal technologies including CO2 capture – 2006. http://my.epri.com. 15 Aug 2012: EPRI
IEA (2011) World energy outlook – investment costs. Available: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/investments.asp. Accessed 7 Feb 2012
IEA NEA OECD (2010) Projected costs of generating electricity. Paris, www.iea.org/speech/2010/Tanaka/iea_nea.pdf. 15 Aug 2012, OECD
IPCC (2005) Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. http://www.ipcc.ch/special-reports/srccs/srccs_wholereport.pdf
Lindenberger D, Lutz C, Schlesinger M (2010) Energieszenarien für ein Energiekonzept der Bundesregierung Köln/Osnabrück/Basel, http://www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/energieszenarien_2010.pdf. 15 Aug 2012: EWI/GWS/PROGNOS
Lohwasser R, Madlener R (2009) Impact of CCS on the economics of coal-fired power plants – why investment costs do and efficiency doesn’t matter. FCN Working Paper, E.ON Research Center, Aachen, http://www.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de/aw/cms/website/themen/home/~sxv/publications_eon/?scol=1&cat=aaaaaaaaaaaasqz&sasc=0&pl=24&pn=7&lang=en. 15 Aug 2012, 7/2009
Mcdonald A, Schrattenholzer L (2001) Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29:255–261
McKinsey (2008) Carbon capture and storage: assessing the economics. http://www.mckinsey.it/idee/practice_news/carbon-capture-and-storage-assessing-the-economics.views
MIT (2007) The future of coal. Cambridge, http://web.mit.edu. 15 Aug 2012: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
MMCD (2010) UK electricity generation costs update. http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/statistics/projections/71-uk-electricity-generation-costs-update-.pdf. 15 Aug 2012: Mott MacDonald
Neij L (2008) Cost development of future technologies for power generation – a study based on experience curves and complementary bottom-up assessments. Energy Policy 36:2200–2211
NETL (2007) Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/baseline_studies.html. 15 Aug 2012: DOE/NETL
Nicholson M, Biegler T, Brook BW (2011) How carbon pricing changes the relative competitiveness of low-carbon baseload generating technologies. Energy 36:305–313
Rübbelke D, Vögele S (2012) Short-term distributional consequences of climate change impacts on the power sector: who gains and who loses? Climatic Change, Online first
Rubin E (2012) Understanding the pitfalls of CCS cost estimates. Int J Greenh Gas Control 10:181–190
Rubin E, Taylor M, Yeh S, Hounshell D (2004) Learning curves for environmental technology and their importance for climate policy analysis. Energy 29:1551–1559
Rubin ES, Chen C, Rao AB (2007a) Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage. Energy Policy 35:4444–4454
Rubin ES, Yeh S, Antes M, Berkenpas M, Davison J (2007b) Use of experience curves to estimate the future cost of power plants with CO2 capture. Int J Greenh Gas Control I:188–197
SFA Pacific Inc (2007) Gasification – critical analysis of technology, economics, and markets. http://www.sfapacific.com/gasification.shtml. 15 Aug 2012
Siegmeier J, von Hirschhausen C (2011) Energiewende: Brauchen wir noch “Kapazitätsmärkte” für konventionelle Kraftwerke? In: Klusmann B, Schütz D (eds) Die Zukunft des Strommarktes. Ponte Press, Bochum
Tzimas E (2009) The cost of carbon capture and storage demonstration projects in Europe. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Luxembourg, http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/browse?type=author&value=TZIMAS+EVANGELOS. 15 Aug 2012: European Commission
Tzimas E, Georgakaki A (2010) A long-term view of fossil-fuelled power generation in Europe. Energy Policy 38:4252–4264
van den Broek M, Hoefnagels R, Rubin E, Turkenburg W, Faaij A (2009) Effects of technological learning on future cost and performance of power plants with CO2 capture. Prog Energy Combust Sci 35:457–480
ZEP (2008) EU demonstration programme for CO2 capture and storage (CCS) – ZEP’s proposal. In: European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants (ZEP) (ed) Brussels, http://www.zero-emissionplatform.eu/website/docs/ETP%20ZEP/EU%20Demonstration%20Programme%20for%20CCS%20-%20ZEP's%20Proposal.pdf. 15 Aug 2012
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 LCOE
LCOE according to Global CCS Institute (2009), supplemented with a cost term for CO2 allowances (IEA NEA OECD 2010):
1.2 CAC
Where
-
EGC CCS : energy generation costs of a plant with carbon capture,
-
EGC REF : energy generation costs of the plant without carbon capture,
-
CO 2,REF : specific CO2 emissions without carbon capture,
-
CO 2,CCS : specific CO2 emissions with carbon capture
1.3 Learning Curves
1.4 Methodological Approach for Merit Order Analyses
The methodological approach is based on the assumption of full competition on the electricity market. The price of electricity is regulated there depending on supply and demand. The price of electricity is determined by the marginal costs of the most expensive power plant needed to cover demand. The target function of the optimization formulation is thus:
where
-
t: time index []
-
n, m: country index
-
i: index for power plant type
-
c i : electricity generation costs of power plant type i [€/MWh]
-
s i,n,t : utilization of power plant type i in country n at time t, where 0 ≤ s i,n,t ≤ 1 []
-
X i,n : installed capacity of power plant type i in country n [MW]
-
c l : costs for exchange of electricity [€/MWh]
-
imp n,m,t : net imports of electricity from country n to country m [€/MWh]
A secondary condition here is that demand must always be covered.
In addition, electricity import and export capacities must be considered.
with
-
NTC n,m : net transfer capacities.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kuckshinrichs, W., Vögele, S. (2015). Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture in the Energy Sector. In: Kuckshinrichs, W., Hake, JF. (eds) Carbon Capture, Storage and Use. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11943-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11943-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11942-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11943-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)