Skip to main content

A Preliminary Investigation of the Reliability and Validity of Hofstede’s Cross Cultural Dimensions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 2000 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference

Abstract

The concept of culture is very important for all fields of social and behavioral science. As firms expand globally, a greater understanding of the effects of culture becomes increasingly important. Countries throughout the world have different cultural standards and values. For example, what is acceptable in one culture may not be considered legal or even ethical in another culture. Insider trading, bribery, marketing tobacco products, green marketing, and intellectual property rights are examples of issues that are viewed differently among countries (Blodgett, Lu? Rose and Vitell, 2000).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, C.A. (1999). “Attributional Style, Depression, and Loneliness: A Cross Cultural Comparison of American and Chinese Students.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25 (4). 482–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blodgett, J.G., L-C. Lu, G.M. Rose, and S.J. Vitell (working paper, 2000). "Ethical Sensitivity of Stakeholder Interests: A Cross Cultural Comparison."

    Google Scholar 

  • Budner, S. (1962). “Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable.” Journal of Personality, 30. 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Culture Connection (1987). “Chinese Values and the Search for Culture Free Dimensions of Culture.” Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 18. (2). 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T.D. and D.T. Campbell (1969). Quasi Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. V. (1976). Survey of Interpersonal Values -Revised Manual. Chicago. Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill. United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, J.A. and P.M. Hattwick (1992). “Cultural Value orientations: A Comparison of Magazine Advertisements from the United States and Mexico.” Advances in Consumer Research, 19. 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, R. W. (1975). “Measurement of Ambiguity Tolerance.” Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, (6). 607–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Realo, A. and J. Allik (1999). “A Cross Cultural Study of Collectivism: A Comparison of American, Estonian, and Russian Students.” Journal of Social Psychology, 139 (2). 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries”, In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25. eds. M. Zanna. Orlando, Fl: Academic. 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H.C. and V. Vassiliou (1972). A Comparative Analysis of Subjective Culture. In H.C. Triandis (eds.), The Analysis of Subjective Culture (pp. 229–338). New York. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C, R. Bontempo, M J. Villareal M. Asai and N. Lucca (1988). “Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Self-Ingroup Relationships.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54. No:2. 323– 338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S.J., S.L. Nwachukwu, and J.H. Barnes (1993). “The Effects of Culture on Ethical Decision-Making: An Application of Hofstede’s Typology.” Journal of Business Ethics, 12. 753–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voich, D. (1995). Comparative Empirical Analysis of Cultural Values and Perceptions of Political Economy Issues. Westport, CT. Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, S. (1994). “Collectivism among the Japanese: A Perspective from the Self.” in Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, method and Applications, eds., Uichol Kim, Harry C. Triandis, Cigdem Kagitcibasi, Sang-Chin Choi, and Gene Yoon. London, U.K.. Sage Publications. 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bakir, A., Blodgett, J.G., Vitell, S.J., Rose, G.M. (2015). A Preliminary Investigation of the Reliability and Validity of Hofstede’s Cross Cultural Dimensions. In: Spotts, H., Meadow, H. (eds) Proceedings of the 2000 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11885-7_55

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics