Skip to main content

Profiling Ethical Investors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Socially Responsible Investment

Abstract

In the previous chapter we highlighted the important growth experienced by SRI especially remarkable after the 2008 financial crisis. In this context of growth it is important to know the profile of the important emerging group of investors willing to invest with social responsibility criteria, especially in countries like Spain, where this kind of investment is still marginal compared with countries like Australia which has a long SRI tradition. This chapter presents the results from a study designed to examine financial preferences, social, environmental, governance and ethical concerns and, socio-demographic characteristics and motivation of socially responsible investors. Based on an international online survey we analyse the degree of influence of a number of socio-demographic variables on the propensity for being a socially responsible investor. The study can be of great value for marketing researchers, institutional investors and fund managers attempting to identify those investors more receptive to SRI products. The information can also be used by advertising researchers to develop effective advertising campaigns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter is closely related to and heavily based on Pérez-Gladish et al. (2012) published in the Australian Journal of Management.

  2. 2.

    Janice Carpenter is a Senior Financial Advisor at Ethical Investment Services. Janice is recognised as a key proponent of ethical investment in Australia. She has held a position on the board of the Australian Bush Heritage Trust and was Joint founding President of the Ethical Investment Association.

  3. 3.

    We acknowledge that there could be a sample selection bias. Investors who are committed to SRI are more likely to respond. Given that the focus of our study is to profile this group, selection bias is not likely to present a major problem for us.

  4. 4.

    18,941.00 € (source: http://stats.oecde.org).

  5. 5.

    Less than 500,000 inhabitants and located more than an hour drive away from a big or medium-sized city.

  6. 6.

    Above 2.5 million inhabitants.

  7. 7.

    Less than 500,000 inhabitants and located less than an hour drive away from a big or medium-sized city.

  8. 8.

    They were asked to pick a value from a scale ranging from 1 (not important) to 5 (essential) and average values were calculated for all factors in order to establish the order of importance.

  9. 9.

    The RIAA is an industry body for professionals working in responsible investment in Australia and New Zealand. RIAA helps individuals and organizations learn more about how they can make investment choices and take environmental, social, ethical or governance issues into account, in addition to the more conventional focus on financial objectives.

  10. 10.

    A copy of the survey questions is available from the authors upon request.

  11. 11.

    We acknowledge that there could be a sample selection bias. Investors who are committed to SRI are more likely to respond. Given that the focus of our study is to profile this group, selection bias is not likely to present a major problem for us.

  12. 12.

    Annual Average income $42,983. Source: http://stats.oecd.org

  13. 13.

    Regression diagnostics on all specifications indicate rejection of normality. Given this situation, the choice of Huber/White covariance provides robust estimates with respect to general misspecification of the conditional distribution of the dependent variable.

References

  • Anand, P., & Cowton, C. J. (1993). The ethical investor: Exploring dimensions of investment behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14(2), 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmundson, P., & Foerster, S. R. (2001). Socially responsible investing: Better for your soul or your bottom line? Canadian Investment Review, 14(4), 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, D., & Goyen, M. (1998). Putting your money where your mouth is a profile of ethical investors. Financial Services Review, 7(2), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cañal-Fernández, V., & Caso, C. (2013, forthcoming). Caracterización de los Inversores Españoles: la Influencia de la Inversión Socialmente Responsable [Spanish investors characterization: The influence of socially responsible investment]. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad (REFC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L. S. (2000). The financial performance of ethical investment trusts: An Australian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(1), 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EUROSIF (2012). European SRI Study, 2012. Eurosif. http://www.eurosif.org.

  • Getzner, M., & Grabner-Kräuter, S. (2004). Consumer preferences and marketing strategies for green shares: Specifics of the Austrian market. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22(4), 260–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, M. (2008). What counts in social managed investments: Evidence from an international survey. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 13, 35–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junkus, J. C., & Berry, T. C. (2010). The demographic profile of socially responsible investors. Managerial Finance, 36(6), 474–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoll, M. (2002). Ethical screening in modern financial markets: The conflicting claims underlying socially responsible investment. The Business Lawyer, 57(Part 2), 681–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A., & Mackenzie, C. (2000). Morals, money, ethical investing and economic psychology. Human Relations, 53(2), 179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, J., & Gardner, J. (2004). A comparison of socially responsible and conventional investors. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, J. (2008). Investment with a conscience: Examining the impact of pro-social attitudes and perceived financial performance on socially responsible investment behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peifer, J. L. (2011). Morality in the financial market? A look at religiously affiliated mutual funds in the USA. Socio-Economic Review, 9(2), 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Gladish, B., Benson, K., & Faff, R. (2012). Profiling socially responsible investors: Australian evidence. Australian Journal of Management, 37(2), 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RIAA (2013). 2013 responsible investment benchmark report: A benchmark report on responsible investment in Australia and New Zealand by the Responsible Investment Association Australasia. http://www.responsibleinvestment.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/2013-Benchmark-Report.pdf.

  • Rosen, B. N., Sandler, D. M., & Shani, D. (1991). Social issues and socially responsible investment behavior: A preliminary empirical investigation. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 25(2), 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spainsif (2012): Socially Responsible Investment in Spain (In Spanish). Report Spainsif (available at: http://www.spainsif.es/sites/default/files/upload/publicaciones/spainsif_informe_2012_web_1.pdf)

  • SIF(2010): 2010 Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States. Social Investment Forum (SIF). Available at: http://www.ussif.org/

  • Statman, M. (2000). Socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(Part 3), May/June: 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippet, J. (2001). Performance of Australia’s ethical funds. Australian Economic Review, 34(2), 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (2007). Some determinants of the socially responsible investment decision: A cross-country study. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 8(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, T. (2000). The profile of individual ethical investors and their choice of investment criteria. Poole: Bournemouth University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blanca Pérez-Gladish .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Méndez-Rodrı́guez, P., Galguera, L., Bravo, M., Benson, K., Faff, R., Pérez-Gladish, B. (2015). Profiling Ethical Investors. In: Ballestero, E., Pérez-Gladish, B., Garcia-Bernabeu, A. (eds) Socially Responsible Investment. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 219. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11836-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics