Skip to main content

Handling Incidental Findings from Imaging Within IM Related Research—Results from an Empirical-Ethical Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Individualized Medicine

Part of the book series: Advances in Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine ((APPPM,volume 7))

Abstract

This chapter gives a summary of an empirical-ethical study which was carried out as a sub-project of GANI_MED-Greifswald. The aim of this sub-project was to investigate the reaction of participants, caused by incidental findings from a whole-body MRI in the context of SHIP, an epidemiological study conducted in Western Pomerania, Germany. As well as studying the potentially negative reactions of the participants after being informed of incidental findings, it was examined whether the participant’s subjective perception of health is influenced and whether this leads to a changed risk-benefit evaluation concerning the participation in a MRI within the medical research context. In order to investigate this, an analysis of the currently most important codices and relevant literature were taken into consideration to define the subject of discussion and regulation and thus, to define the subject of research in detail. Afterwards the study was carried out according to a mixed-methods design which showed firstly which kind of stress is indeed a result of participating in the MRI examination and which factors cause this. Furthermore, it was shown that the risk-benefit evaluation and thus, the willingness to participate, had not changed significantly after the whole-body MRI examination. However, this might be due to the fact that the research subjects often misjudged the conditions for participation by overestimating the benefits and underestimating the risks. The chapter ends with a short summary of the deductions which were drawn from this study in order to be implemented into the procedures of GANI_MED.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine Concerning Biomedical Research (2005) http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/healthbioethic/Activities/02_Biomedical_research_en/195%20Protocole%20recherche%20biomedicale%20e.pdf. Accessed 03 Jul 2014

  • Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW et al (1987) False hope and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep 17(2):20–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baile WF, Buckmann R, Lenzi R et al (2000) SPIKES-a six-step protocol for delivering BAD news: application to the patient with cancer. The Oncologist 5:302–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borra RJ, Sorensen AG (2011) Incidental findings in brain MRI research: what do we owe our subjects? J Am Coll Radiol 8:848–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Council of Europe (1997) http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/Treaties/Html/164.htm. Accessed 03 Jul 2014

  • Erdmann P (2014) Zufallsbefunde aus bildgebenden Verfahren in populationsbasierter Forschung: Eine empirisch ethische Untersuchung. Mentis. (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann P, Langanke M, Assel H (2013) Zufallsbefunde-Risikobewusstsein von Probanden und forschungsethische Konsequenzen. In: Steger F (ed) Medizin und Technik. Risiken und Folgen technologischen Fortschritts. Mentis, Münster, pp. 15–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallowfield L, Jenkins V (2004) Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. Lancet 363:312–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fallowfield L, Jenkins V, Farewell V et al (2002) Efficacy of a Cancer Research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 359:650–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grabe HJ, Assel H, Bahls T et al (2014) Cohort profile: Greifswald Approach to Individualized Medicine (GANI_MED). J Transl Med 12(144). doi:10.1186/1479-5876-12-144

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegenscheid K, Kühn JP, Völzke H et al (2009) Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of healthy volunteers: pilot study results from the population-based SHIP study. Fortschr Röntgenstr 181:748–759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • International Guidelines for Ethical Review of Epidemiological Studies (1991) http://www.cioms.ch/images/stories/CIOMS/guidelines/1991_texts_of_guidelines.htm. Accessed 03 Jul 2014

  • International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects (2002) Prepared by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). http://www.cioms.ch/publications/guidelines/guidelines_nov_2002_blurb.htm. Accessed 03 Jul 2014

  • International Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Studies (2009) Prepared by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumra S, Ashtari M, Anderson B et al (2006) Ethical and Practical Considerations in the Management of Incidental Findings in Pediatric MRI Studies. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 45:1000–1006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamnek S (2010) Qualitative Sozialforschung. Beltz, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Langanke M, Erdmann P (2011) Die MRT als wissenschaftliche Studienuntersuchung und das Problem der Mitteilung von Zufallsbefunden: Probandenethische Herausforderungen. In: Theissen H, Langanke M (eds) Tragfähige Rede von Gott. Festgabe für Heinrich Assel zum 50. Geburtstag 9. Februar 2011. Verlag Dr. Kovač, Hamburg, pp. 198–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitlinien der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung der Magnet-Resonanz-Tomographie. Gemäß Beschluss des Vorstandes der Bundesärztekammer (2000) Deutsches Ärzteblatt 97(39):A2557–A2568

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire P (2005) Breaking bad news: talking about death and dying. Medicine 33:29–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • (Muster-)Berufsordnung für die in Deutschland tätigen Ärztinnen und Ärzte-MBO-1997-in der Fassung der Beschlüsse des 114. Deutschen Ärztetages 2011 in Kiel (2011) http://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/page.asp?his=1.100.1143. Accessed 3 Jul 2014

  • Positionspapier der Schweizerischen Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften (SAMW) und der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Ethikkommissionen (AGEK). (2012) Schriftliche Aufklärung im Zusammenhang mit Forschungsprojekten. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung 93:1299–1301

    Google Scholar 

  • Plano Clark VL, Creswell JW (2008) A sequential explanatory mixed methods design to explain findings, editors’ introduction. In: Plano Clark VL Creswell JW (eds) The mixed methods reader. Sage, Nebrasca, pp. 466–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Puls R, Hamm B, Hosten, N (2010) MRT ohne Radiologen-ethische Aspekte bei bevölkerungsbasierten Studien mit MR-Untersuchung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 182:469–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raab-Steiner E, Benesch M (2008) Der Fragebogen: Von der Forschungsidee zur SPSS-Auswertung. Facultas, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Raspe H, Hüppe A (2012) Research Ethics Committees: identifying and weighing potential benefit and harm from clinical studies. WMJ 58(1):2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Rid A, Emanuel EJ, Wendler D (2010) Evaluating the risks of clinical research. JAMA 304(13):1472–1479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Langanke M, Erdmann P et al (2014) Ethische und rechtliche Aspekte im Umgang mit genetischen Zufallsbefunden: Herausforderungen und Lösungsansätze. Ethik in der Medizin 26(2):105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt CO, Hegenscheid K, Erdmann P et al (2013) Psychosocial consequences and severity of disclosed incidental findings from whole-body MRI in a general population study. Eur Radiol 23:1343–1351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmücker R (2012) Zufallsbefunde-was gebietet die Menschenwürde? Preprints and Working Papers of the Centre for Advanced Study in Bioethics Münster 2012/36. https://www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/kfg-normenbegruendung/intern/publikationen/schmuecker/36_-_schm__cker_-_zufallsbefunde_und_menschenw__rde.pdf. Accessed 20 Jun 2014

  • SHIP (2009) Leben und Gesundheit in Vorpommern. Teilnehmerinformation. Version S2-V 3.0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Humangenetik zu genetischen Zusatzbefunden in Diagnostik und Forschung (2013) http://www.gfhev.de/de/leitlinien/LL_und_Stellungnahmen/2013_05_28_Stellungnahme_zu_genetischen_Zufallsbefunden.pdf. Accessed 03 Jul 2014

  • Thiele F (2011) Autonomie und Einwilligung in der Medizin. Eine moralphilosophische Rekonstruktion. Mentis, Paderborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Völzke H, Alte D, Schmidt CO et al (2011) Cohort profile: The study of health in Pomerania. Int J Epidemiol 40:294–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WMA Declaration of Helsinki-Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (2013) Adopted by the 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964 and amended by the: 29th WMA General Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October 1975, 35th WMA General Assembly, Venice, Italy, October 1983, 41st WMA General Assembly, Hong Kong, September 1989, 48th WMA General Assembly, Somerset West, Republic of South Africa, October 1996, 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000, 53rd WMA General Assembly, Washington DC, USA, October 2002 (Note of Clarification added), 55th WMA General Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October 2004 (Note of Clarification added), 59th WMA General Assembly, Seoul, Republic of Korea, October 2008, 64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/. Accessed 22 May 2014

Download references

Acknowledgments

For important suggestions regarding content and method I want to thank Prof. Dr. Thomas Kohlmann, Prof. Dr. Heinrich Assel, Prof. Dr. Henry Völzke and PD Dr. Carsten-Oliver Schmidt. I would also like to thank Wenke Liedtke for her work on the illustrations and Antje Holtmann for the translation into English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pia Erdmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erdmann, P. (2015). Handling Incidental Findings from Imaging Within IM Related Research—Results from an Empirical-Ethical Study. In: Fischer, T., Langanke, M., Marschall, P., Michl, S. (eds) Individualized Medicine. Advances in Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11719-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11719-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11718-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11719-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics