Skip to main content

Remote Service Technologies - A Framework and Factors Influencing Adoption in B2B Relationships

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Sustainable Global Marketplace

Abstract

The world is becoming characterized by services” (Ostrom et al. 2010, p. 4) during the last decade, services industries were subject to considerable changes with regard to the way services are provided and delivered (Bitner, Brown, and Meuter 2000). Modern information technologies leverage service advances (Ostrom et al. 2010) and alter not only the nature of services and their delivery process (Bitner, Brown, and Meuter 2000) but also the interaction at the interface between service providers and customers (Colby and Parasuraman 2003). (Self)-Service technologies in B2C-settings have received considerable research interest over the last years (Dabholkar 1996; Makarem, Mudambi, and Podoshen 2009). However these concepts fall short in explaining complex service technologies in business-to-business settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Biehl, Markus, Edmund Prater, and John R. McIntyre (2004), “Remote Repair, Diagnostics and Maintenance: An Overview and Comparison of the U.S., Japanese and German Machine Tool Industry,” Communications of the ACM, 47(11), 101–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, Mary J. (1993), “Managing the Evidence of Service,” The Service Quality Handbook, 358–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, Mary J., Bernhard H. Brooms, and Mary S. Tetreault (1990), “The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents,” Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, Mary J., Stephen W. Brown, and Mattews L. Meuter (2000), “Technology Infusion in Service Encounters,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 138–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, David, Audrey Gilmore, and Kjell Gronhaug (2001), Qualitative Marketing Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, Charles L. and A. Parasuraman (2003), “Technology Still Matters Never Mind the Doomsayers. E-Services are Alive, Well, and Positioned for Growth,” Marketing Management, 12(4), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, S. S. and Susan P. Douglas (2000), International Marketing Reserach. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, Pratibha A. (1996), “Consumer Evaluations of new technology-based Self-Service Options: An Investigation of alternative Models of Service Quality,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, John C. (1954), “The Critical Incident Technique,” Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327“58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gremler, Dwayne D. and Kevin Gwinner (2000), “Customer-Employee Rapport in Service Relationships,” Journal of Service Research, 3(1), 82–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makarem, Suzanne C., Susan M. Mudambi, and Jefferey S. Podoshen (2009), “Satisfaction in technology-enabled Service Encounters,” Journal of Services Marketing, 23(3), 134–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Amy L., Mary J. Bitner, Stephen W. Brown, Kevin A. Burkhard, Michael Goul, Vicky Smith-Daniels, Haluk Demirkan, and Elliot Rabinovich (2010), “Moving Forward and Making a Difference: Research Priorities for the Science of Service,” Journal of Service Research, 13(1), 4–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, Jan H., Nancy V. Keller, Florian v.Wangenheim, and Hartmut H. Holzmüller (2007), “Technology Mediation in Service Delivery: A new Typology and an Agenda for Managers and Academics,” in AMA Winter Educator’s Conference Proceedings, 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selnes, Fred and Havard Hansen (2001), “The Potenzial Hazard of Self-Service in Developing Customer Loyalty,” Journal of Service Research, 4(2), 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkovics, Rudolph R., Elfriede. Penz, and Pervez Ghauri (2005), “Analysing Textual Data in International Marketing Research,” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(1), 9–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. M., P. Lukassen, and M. Mahlendorf (2010), “Misused and missed Use – Grounded Theory and Objective Hermeneutics as Methods for Research in Industrial Marketing,” Industrial Marketing Management, 39 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, Valerie A., A. Parasuraman, and Arvind Malhotra (2002), “Service Quality Delivery Through Web Sites: A Critical Review of Extant Knowledge,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 362–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paluch, S., Holzmüller, H.H. (2015). Remote Service Technologies - A Framework and Factors Influencing Adoption in B2B Relationships. In: Dato-on, M. (eds) The Sustainable Global Marketplace. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10873-5_225

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics