Abstract
As in all aerobic bioprocesses, the oxygen transfer rate is a critical parameter that needs to be met for the satisfactory cultivation of animal cells. Oxygen in solution has to be continuously provided because of its low solubility in aqueous solution which is continually being utilised by the growing cells (at the current time, reaching a cell density of ~107 cells mL−1 in bioreactors up to 25 m3). Such a process requires a certain specific power input (or mean specific energy dissipation rate) to be used, which also has to provide a satisfactory level of other mixing parameters. However, though for animal cells, the specific power required is relatively low (typically < ~0.05 W/kg), because of the lack of a cell wall, there is still a perception that ‘shear damage’ may occur. Another aspect of oxygen mass transfer is the need to provide a continual inflow of oxygen into the bioreactor, typically by sparging (rates < ~0.01 vvm). However, especially at large scale, sparging may lead to excessive foaming requiring the use of antifoam to control it; and bursting bubbles damage cells unless protective agents are used. Both these additives negatively affect the rate of mass transfer. Another critical aspect directly linked to oxygen transfer is the molar equivalent production of carbon dioxide by the cells. Stripping of CO2 is essential to prevent physiologically damaging levels of pCO2 being produced as well as issues associated with pH and osmolality. Essentially, oxygen transfer, carbon dioxide stripping and mixing parameters are all intimately connected and need to be considered in an integrated way. In this chapter, oxygen mass transfer and carbon dioxide stripping theory and practice are considered in detail including non-stirred and single use bioreactors. In addition, other mixing parameters such as blending, heat transfer and scale-up/scale-down in stirred bioreactors are briefly considered as these are used commercially from the 15 mL ambrTM to the 25 m3 scale. Because the perceived ‘shear-sensitivity’ of animal cells to stirring and bubbling has impacted on how aeration and stripping have been addressed in practice, these topics too are worthy of consideration in any integrated approach. Finally, some recommendations regarding sparger selection and impeller choice are also made.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albaek MO, Gernaey KV, Hansen MS, Stocks SM (2011) Modeling enzyme production with Aspergillus oryzae in pilot scale vessels with different agitation, aeration, and agitator types. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:1828–1840
Anderlei T, Büchs J (2001) Device for sterile online measurement of the oxygen transfer rate in shaking flasks. Biochem Eng J 7:157–162
Bandyopadhyoy B, Humphrey AE, Taguchi H (1967) Dynamic measurement of the volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient in fermentation systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 9:533–544
Bareither R, Pollard D (2011) A review of advanced small-scale parallel bioreactor technology for accelerated process development: current state and future need. Biotechnol Prog 27:2–14
Betts JPJ, Warr SRC, Finka GB, Uden M, Town M, Janda M, Baganz F, Lye G (2014) Impact of aeration strategies on fedbatch cell culture kinetics in a single use 24 well miniature bioreactor. Biochem Eng J 82:105–116
Boulton-Stone JM, Blake JR (1993) Gas bubbles bursting at a free surface. J Fluid Mech 254:103–111
Chalmers JJ, Bavarian F (1991) Microscopic visualization of insect cell-bubble interactions. ii: the bubble film and bubble rupture. Biotechnol Prog 7:151–158
Cooke M, Middleton JC, Bush JR (1988) Mixing and mass transfer in filamentous fermentations. In: King R (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd international conference of bioreactor fluid dynamics, BHR Group, Cranfield, pp 37–64
Cooke M, Dawson MK, Moody GW, Whitton MJ, Nienow AW (1991) Mass transfer in aerated agitated vessels; assessment of the NEL/Hickman steady state method. In: Bruxelmane M, Froment G (eds) Proceedings of the 7th European mixing conference, KVIV, pp 409–418
Cronin DG, Nienow AW, Moody GW (1994) An experimental study of the mixing in a protofermenter agitated by dual Rushton turbines. Food Bioprod Process 72:35–40
Davies JT (1972) Turbulence phenomena. Academic, New York
De Jesus MJ, Wurm FM (2013) Scale-up and predictability in process development with suspension cultures of mammalian cells for recombinant protein manufacture: comments on a trend reversal. Pharmaceut Bioprocess 4:333–335
De Jesus MJ, Girard P, Bourgeois M, Baumgartner G, Jacko B, Amstutz H, Wurm FM (2004) TubeSpin satellites: a fast track approach for process development with animal cells using shaking technology. Biochem Eng J 17:217–223
de Zengotita VM, Schmelzer AE, Miller WM (2002) Characterisation of hybridoma cell responses to elevated pCO2 and osmolality: intracellular pH, cell size, apoptosis and metabolism. Biotechnol Bioeng 77:369–380
Doig SD, Ortiz-Ochoa K, Ward JM, Baganz F (2005) Characterization of oxygen transfer in miniature and lab-scale bubble column bioreactors and comparison of microbial growth performance based on constant k L a. Biotechnol Prog 21:1175–1182
Enfors S-O et al (2001) Physiological responses to mixing in large-scale bioreactors. J Biotechnol 85:175–185
Garnier A, Voyer R, Tom R, Perret S, Jardin B, Kamen A (1996) Dissolved carbon dioxide accumulation in a large scale and high density production of TGFb receptor with baculovirus infected Sf-9 cells. Cytotechnology 22:53–63
Geisler R, Krebs R, Forschner P (1994) Local turbulent shear stress in stirred vessels and its significance for different mixing tasks. In: Proceedings of the 8th European mixing conference. Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, pp 241–251
Gezork K, Bujalski W, Cooke M, Nienow AW (2001) Mass transfer and hold-up characteristics in gassed, stirred vessels at intensified operating conditions. Chem Eng Res Des 79:965–972
Goudar CT, Matanguihan R, Long E, Cruz C, Zhang C, Piret JM, Konstantinov KB (2007) Decreased pCO2 accumulation by eliminating bicarbonate addition to high cell-density cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng 96:1107–1117
Handa-Corrigan A, Emery AN, Spier RE (1989) Effects of gas-liquid interfaces on the growth of suspended mammalian cells: mechanisms of cell damage by bubbles. Enzyme Microb Technol 11:230–235
Hari-Prajitno D, Mishra VP, Takenaka K, Bujalski W, Nienow AW, McKemmie JM (1998) Gas–liquid mixing studies with multiple up- and down-pumping hydrofoil impellers: power characteristics and mixing time. Can J Chem Eng 76:1056–1068
Heinen JJ, van’t Riet K (1982) Mass transfer, mixing and heat transfer phenomena in low viscous bubble column reactors. In: Proceedings of the 4th European conference on mixing, BHRGroup, Cranfield, pp 195–224
Hermann R, Lehmann M, Büchs J (2003) Characterization of gas–liquid mass transfer phenomena in microtiter plates. Biotechnol Bioeng 81:178–186
Hewitt CJ, Nienow AW (2007) The scale-up of microbial batch and fed-batch fermentation processes. Adv Appl Microbiol 62:105–136
Hoeks FWJMM, Khan M, Guter D, Willems M, Osman JJ, Mommers R, Wayte J (2004) Industrial applications of mixing and mass transfer studies. In: Alvin W Nienow’s day; stirred, not shaken symposium. The University of Birmingham, Birmingham
Hsu W-T, Aulakh RPS, Traul DL, Yuk IH (2012) Advanced microscale bioreactor system: a representative scale-down model for bench-top bioreactors. Cytotechnology 64:667–678
Hu B, Nienow AW, Stitt EH, Pacek AW (2007) Bubble sizes in agitated water-hydrophilic organic solvents for heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:4451–4458
Kilburn DG, Webb FC (1968) The cultivation of animal cells at controlled dissolved oxygen partial pressure. Biotechnol Bioeng 10:801–814
Kuboi R, Nienow AW, Allsford K (1983) A multipurpose stirred tank facility for flow visualisation and dual impeller power measurement. Chem Eng Commun 22:29–39
Langheinrich C, Nienow AW (1999) Control of pH in large scale, free suspension animal cell bioreactors: alkali addition and pH excursions. Biotechnol Bioeng 66:171–179
Langheinrich C, Nienow AW, Stevenson NC, Emery AN, Clayton TM, Slater NKH (2002) Oxygen transfer in stirred bioreactors under animal cell culture conditions. Food Bioprod Process 80:39–44
Lavery M, Nienow AW (1987) Oxygen transfer in animal cell culture medium. Biotechnol Bioeng 30:368–373
Linek V, Vacek V, Benes P, Sinkule J (1987) Comments on initial response analysis of mass transfer in gas sparged stirred vessels. Chem Eng Sci 42:389–390
Lu W-M, Wu H-Z, Chou C-Y (2002) Gas recirculation rate and its influences on mass transfer in multiple impeller systems with various impeller combinations. Can J Chem Eng 80:51–62
Machon V, Pacek AW, Nienow AW (1997) Bubble sizes in electrolyte and alcohol solutions in a turbulent stirred vessel. Chem Eng Res Des 75:339–345
Martin T, McFarlane CM, Nienow AW (1994) The influence of liquid properties and impeller type on bubble coalescence behaviour and mass transfer in sparged, agitated bioreactors. In: Proceedings of the 8th European mixing conference, Cambridge, September 1994. Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, pp 57–64
Morao A, Maia CI, Fonseca MMR, Vasconcelos JMT, Alves SS (1999) Effect of antifoam addition on gas–liquid mass transfer in stirred fermenters. Bioprocess Eng 20:165–172
Moses S, Manahan M, Ambrogelly A, Ling WLM (2012) Assessment of ambrTM as a model for high-throughput cell culture process development strategy. Adv Biosci Biotechnol 3:918–927
Mostafa SS, Gu X (2003) Strategies for improved dCO2 removal in large-scale fed-batch cultures. Biotechnol Prog 19:45–51
Nienow AW (1997a) The mixer as a reactor – liquid/solid systems, Chapter 17. In: Harnby N, Edwards MF, Nienow AW (Eds) Mixing in the process industries, 2nd edn (paperback revision). Butterworth Heinemann, London, pp 394–411
Nienow AW (1997b) On impeller circulation and mixing effectiveness in the turbulent flow regime. Chem Eng Sci 52:2557–2565
Nienow AW (2003a) Letter to the editor. Can J Chem Eng 81:318
Nienow AW (2003b) Aeration-biotechnology. In: Kirk Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology, vol 1, 5th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 730–747
Nienow AW (2006) Reactor engineering in large scale animal cell culture. Cytotechnology 50:9–33
Nienow AW (2010) Impeller selection: animal cell culture. In: Flickinger MC (ed) Encyclopedia of industrial biotechnology, vol 5. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 2959–2971
Nienow AW (2014) Letter to the editor. J Biotechnol 171:82–84
Nienow AW, Langheinrich C, Stevenson NC, Emery AN, Clayton TM, Slater NKH (1996) Homogenisation and oxygen transfer rates in large agitated and sparged animal cell bioreactors: some implications for growth and production. Cytotechnology 22:87–94
Nienow AW, Rielly CD, Brosnan KM, Bargh N, Lee K, Coopman K, Hewitt CJ (2013a) The physical characterisation of a microscale parallel bioreactor platform with an industrial CHO cell line expressing an IgG4. Biochem Eng J 76:25–36
Nienow AW, Scott WH, Hewitt CJ, Thomas CR, Lewis G, Amanullah A, Kiss R, Meier SJ (2013b) Scale-down studies for assessing the impact of different stress parameters on growth and product quality during animal cell culture. Chem Eng Res Des 91:2265–2274
Oosterhuis NMG, Neubauer P, Junne S (2013) Single-use bioreactors for microbial cultivation. Pharmaceut Bioprocess 1:167–177
Osman JJ, Birch J, Varley J (2002) The response of GS-NSO myeloma cells to single and multiple pH perturbations. Biotechnol Bioeng 79:398–407
Ozturk SS (1996) Engineering challenges in high-density cell culture systems. Cytotechnology 22:3–16
Pedersen AG (1997) kLa characterisation of industrial fermenters. In: Nienow AW (ed) Proceedings of 4th international bioreactor and bioprocess fluid dynamics conference. BHRGroup, Cranfield, pp 263–276
Pollard D (2014) Are automated disposable small-scale reactors set to dominate the future of pharmaceutical bioprocess development? Pharmaceut Bioprocess 2:9–12
Prins A, van’t Riet K (1987) Proteins and surface effects in fermentation: foam, antifoam and mass transfer. Trends Biotechnol 5:296–301
Ruszkowski S (1994) A rational method for measuring blending performance and comparison of different impeller types. In: Proceedings of the 8th European mixing conference. Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, pp 283–291
Sieblist C, Aehle M, Pohlscheidt M, Jenzsch M, Lübbert A (2010) A test facility for fritted spargers of production-scale-bioreactors. Cytotechnology 63:49–55
Sieblist C, Hägeholz O, Aehle M, Jenzsch M, Pohlscheidt M, Lübbert A (2011a) Insights into large-scale cell-culture reactors: II. Gas-phase mixing and CO2 stripping. Biotechnol J 6:1547–1556
Sieblist C, Jenzsch M, Pohlscheidt M, Lübbert A (2011b) Insights into large-scale cell-culture reactors: I. Liquid mixing and oxygen supply. Biotech J 6:1532–1546
Sieblist C, Jenzsch M, Pohlscheidt M (2013) Influence of Pluronic F68 on mass transfer. Biotechnol Prog 29:1278–1288
Sieck JB, Cordes T, Budach WE, Rhiel MH, Suemeghy Z, Leist C, Villiger TK, Morbidelli M, Soos M (2013) Development of a scale-down model of hydrodynamic stress to study the performance of an industrial CHO cell line under simulated production scale bioreactor conditions. J Biotechnol 164:41–49
Simmons MJH, Zhu H, Bujalski W, Hewitt CJ, Nienow AW (2007) Mixing in bioreactors using agitators with a high solidity ratio and deep blades. Chem Eng Res Des 85:551–559
Sweere APJ, Luyben KCMM, Kossen NWF (1987) Regime analysis and scale-down: tools to investigate the performance of bioreactors. Enzyme Microb Technol 9:386
Takahashi K, Nienow AW (1991) Bubble sizes and coalescence rates in an aerated vessel agitated by a Rushton turbine. J Chem Eng Jpn 26:536–542
Telling RC, Stone L (1964) A method of automatic pH control of a bicarbonate – CO2 buffer system for the submerged culture of hamster kidney cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 6:147–158
Van’t Riet K (1979) Review of measuring methods and results in non-viscous gas–liquid mass transfer in stirred vessels. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 18:357–364
Van’t Riet K, Tramper J (1991) Basic bioreactor design. Marcel Dekker, New York
Varley J, Birch J (1999) Reactor design for large-scale suspension animal cell culture. Cytotechnology 29:177–205
Vasconcelos JMT, Alves SS, Bujalski W, Nienow AW (1997) Spatial characteristics of oxygen transfer in a dual impeller agitated aerated tank. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on bioreactor and bioprocess fluid dynamics, Edinburgh. BHR Group, Cranfield, pp 645–660
Vrabel P, van der Lans RGJM, Luyben KCAM, Boon LA, Nienow AW (2000) Mixing in large scale vessels stirred with multiple radial or radial and axial up-pumping impellers: modelling and measurements. Chem Eng Sci 55:5881–5896
Werner S, Kaiser SC, Kraume M, Eibl D (2014) Computational fluid dynamics as a modern tool for engineering characterization of bioreactors. Pharmaceut Bioprocess 2:85–99
Wernersson ES, Tragardh C (1999) Scale-up of Rushton turbine-agitated tanks. Chem Eng Sci 54:4245–4256
Xing Z, Kenty BM, Li ZJ, Lee SS (2009) Scale-up analysis for a CHO cell culture process in large-scale bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 103:733–746
Zhu H, Simmons MJH, Bujalski W, Nienow AW (2007) Mixing of the liquid phase in a model aerated bioreactor equipped with ‘Elephant Ear’ agitators using particle image velocimetry. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Multiphase Flow (ICMF 2007). Leipzig, Germany, pp 110–120
Zhu Y, Cuenca JV, Zhou W, Varma A (2008) NS0 cell damage by high gas velocity sparging in protein-free and cholesterol-free cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng 101:751–760
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Nomenclature
- a
-
Specific area of bubbles, m−1
- A
-
Dimensional constant in Eq. 5.23
- AR
-
Aspect ratio, H/T
- C L
-
Concentration in the liquid phase, mol m−3
- d 32
-
Sauter mean diameter, m
- D
-
Agitator diameter, m
- D L
-
Diffusion coefficient, m2 s−1
- g
-
Gravitational constant, 9.81 m s−2
- H
-
Bioreactor fill level, m; or Henry’s law constant, atm. m3 mol−1
- H G
-
Height of aerated liquid, m
- J
-
Rate of mass transfer, mol s−1
- k g
-
Gas film mass transfer coefficient, mol s−1 m−2 atm−1
- k L
-
Liquid film mass transfer coefficient, m s−1
- k L a
-
Specific mass transfer coefficient, s−1 or h−1
- M
-
Mass of media, kg
- N
-
Agitator speed, s−1 or rpm; or specific rate of mass transfer, mol m−3 s−1
- OD
-
Oxygen demand, mol m−3 s−1
- OTR
-
Oxygen transfer rate, mol m−3 s−1
- OUR
-
Oxygen uptake rate, mol m−3 s−1
- p
-
Partial pressure, atm
- P
-
Power, W; or total pressure, atm
- P g
-
Total pressure, atm
- Po
-
Power number, dimensionless
- Q G
-
Air flow rate, m3 s−1
- Q H
-
Heat evolution rate, W m−3
- R
-
Gas constant, m3 atm K−1 mol−1
- Re
-
Reynolds number, dimensionless
- SOD
-
Specific oxygen demand, mol s−1 cell−1
- t
-
Temperature, °C; or time, s
- T
-
Bioreactor diameter, m; or absolute temperature, K
- v S
-
Superficial gas velocity, m s−1
- VVM
-
Specific volumetric flow rate, (min−1)
- V
-
Volume of media, m3
- y
-
Mol fraction, dimensionless
- X
-
Cell density, cells m−3; or % dO2
Greek Letters
- α,β
-
Exponents
- ΔC
-
Concentration driving force, mol m−3
- ε G
-
Hold-up, dimensionless
- ε T
-
Local specific energy dissipation rate, W kg−1
- \( {\overline{\varepsilon}}_T \)
-
Mean specific energy dissipation rate, W kg−1
- λ K
-
Kolmogoroff turbulence scale, m
- μ
-
Viscosity, Pa s
- ν
-
Kinematic viscosity, m2 s−1
- ρ
-
Liquid density, kg m−3
- τ p
-
Time constant of the oxygen probe, s
- θ m
-
Mixing time, s
Subscripts
- CO 2
-
Carbon dioxide
- Crit
-
Critical oxygen concentration
- I
-
At the interface
- In
-
Entering at the sparger
- G
-
When air is sparged; or in the gas phase
- Max
-
Maximum
- Out
-
At the exit
- O 2
-
Oxygen
Superscript
- *
-
At equilibrium
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nienow, A.W. (2015). Mass Transfer and Mixing Across the Scales in Animal Cell Culture. In: Al-Rubeai, M. (eds) Animal Cell Culture. Cell Engineering, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10320-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10320-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10319-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10320-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)