Skip to main content

A RECIPE for Meaningful Gamification

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gamification in Education and Business

Abstract

Meaningful gamification is the use of gameful and playful layers to help a user find personal connections that motivate engagement with a specific context for long-term change. While reward-based gamification can be useful for short-term goals and situations where the participants have no personal connections or intrinsic motivation to engage in a context, rewards can reduce intrinsic motivation and the long-term desire to engage with the real world context. If the goal is long-term change, then rewards should be avoided and other game-based elements used to create a system based on concepts of meaningful gamification. This article introduces six concepts—Reflection, Exposition, Choice, Information, Play, and Engagement—to guide designers of gamification systems that rely on non-reward-based game elements to help people find personal connections and meaning in a real world context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD Research, 1(1). Available online at http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm.

  • Brand, J. E., Knight, S. J. (2005) The narrative and ludic nexus in computer games: Diverse worlds II. Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association Conference, Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/06278.57359.pdf

  • Branigan, E. (2006). Projecting a camera: Language games in film theory. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callois, R. (2001). Man, play and games. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanning, R., & Gaba, D. (2007). The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2(2), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwen, G. (2009). What is play? In search of a definition. Children to Red Hatters: Diverse Images and Issues of Play: Play and Culture Studies. 8. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (1999). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise, and other bribes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A., & Fry, R. (1975). Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of group process. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2010). Learning to play, playing to learn: A case study of a ludic learning space. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(1), 26–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramlinger, T., & Huberty, T. (1990). Behaviorism versus humanism. Training and Devleopment Journal, 44(12), 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifelong Kindergarten Group (2013). About SCRATCH. Retrieved online from http://scratch.mit.edu/about/.

  • Maroney, K. (2001, May). My entire waking life. The Games Journal. Retrieved from http://www.thegamesjournal.com/articles/MyEntireWakingLife.shtml

  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, S. (2012a, June). A user-centered theoretical framework for meaningful gamification. Paper Presented at Games+Learning+Society 8.0, Madison. Retrieved from online at http://scottnicholson.com/pubs/meaningfulframework.pdf

  • Nicholson, S. (2012b, October). Strategies for meaningful gamification: Concepts behind transformative play and participatory museums. Presented at Meaningful Play 2012. Lansing. Retrieved from online at http://scottnicholson.com/pubs/meaningfulstrategies.pdf

  • Nicholson, S. (2012c). Completing the experience: Debriefing in experiential educational games. In the Proceedings of The 3rd International Conference on Society and Information Technologies. Winter Garden: International Institute of Informatics and Systemics. 117–121. Retrieved from online at http://scottnicholson.com/pubs/completingexperience.pdf

  • Nicholson, S. (2013, June). Exploring gamification techniques for classroom management. Paper presented at Games + Learning + Society 9.0, Madison. Retrieved from online at http://scottnicholson.com/pubs/gamificationtechniquesclassroom.pdf

  • Pink, D. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Riverhead Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schamber, L. (1994). Relevance and information behavior. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology 29 (pp. 3–48). Medford, NJ: American Society for Information Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, L. (2011). The multiplayer classroom: Designing coursework as a game. Boston: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, J. (2007). Narrative, games, and theory. Game Studies, 7(1). Retrieved from http://gamestudies.org/0701/articles/simons.

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiagarajan, S. (2004, February). Six phases of debriefing. Play for Performance. Retrieved from http://www.thiagi.com/pfp/IE4H/february2004.html

  • Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Nicholson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nicholson, S. (2015). A RECIPE for Meaningful Gamification. In: Reiners, T., Wood, L. (eds) Gamification in Education and Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics