Skip to main content

The Concept of Opportunity to Learn (OTL) in International Comparisons of Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessing Mathematical Literacy

Abstract

Items addressing the Opportunity to Learn (OTL) construct, the idea that the time a student spends in learning something is related to what that student learns, was included in the mathematics portion of PISA 2012 for the first time. Several questions on the student survey were designed to measure students’ opportunity to learn important concepts and skills associated with the assessed mathematical literacy. This chapter traces the development of this type of information in international comparisons of education and discusses four types of items that have been developed for this purpose. It also discusses the unique challenge of measuring this concept in PISA as it focuses on literacy, the knowledge students have acquired over their schooling to date, rather than on the content knowledge students have gained from schooling during a particular year or at a particular grade level. The specific OTL items and their purpose are identified from the Student Questionnaire section of Appendix A in the PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytic Framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berliner, D. C. (1990). What’s all the fuss about instructional time? In M. Ben-Perez & R. Bromme (Eds.), The nature of time in school (pp. 3–35). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1974). Time and learning. American Psychologist, 29(9), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64(8), 723–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, D.C. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • HusĂ©n, T. (Ed.). (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics, a comparison of twelve countries (Vol. II). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics report (p. 516). Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Take the test. Sample questions from OECD’s PISA assessments. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Take%20the%20test%20e%20book.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2014.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do. Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. 1, p. 276). Paris: OECD Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013a). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy (p. 264). Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013b). Measuring opportunities to learn mathematics. In PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do—Student performance in mathematics, reading and science. (Vol. I, pp. 145–174). Paris: OECD Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., & McKnight, C. C. (2012). Inequality for all: The challenge of unequal opportunity in American schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., Jorde, D., Cogan, L. S., Barrier, E., Gonzalo, I., Moser, U., et al. (1996). Characterizing pedagogical flow: An investigation of mathematics and science teaching in six countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., Zoido, P., & Cogan, L. S. (2013). Schooling matters: Opportunity to learn in PISA 2012 (OECD education working papers, no. 95). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3v0hldmchl-en

  • Travers, K. J., & Westbury, I. (1989). The IEA study of mathematics I: Analysis of mathematics curricula (Vol. 1). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K. (1989). Problem solving and cognitive skill acquisition. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 527–579). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leland S. Cogan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cogan, L.S., Schmidt, W.H. (2015). The Concept of Opportunity to Learn (OTL) in International Comparisons of Education. In: Stacey, K., Turner, R. (eds) Assessing Mathematical Literacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics