Skip to main content

Patent Activities in Non-R&D-Intensive Technology Areas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Low-tech Innovation

Abstract

Intellectual property protection via patenting can be regarded as an indispensable means to stay competitive at the national and international levels, also in non-R&D-intensive technology areas. As patents can be used as output indicators of innovation, we aim to shed light on the technological output of non-R&D-intensive sectors with the help of in-depth patent analyses. In addition to investigating the absolute numbers and shares of patent filings compared with the high-technology areas, we examine the positioning of non-R&D-intensive sectors within the innovation chain and assess their internationalisation trends within Germany over the last decade.

The results of our analyses, which are based on the “EPO Worldwide Patent Statistical Database” (PATSTAT), show that the non-R&D-intensive technology areas are an integral part of the development of research and technology within the world economy. Patents from the non-R&D-intensive areas constitute approximately 40 % of worldwide transnational filings, although the size and importance of the non-R&D-intensive technology areas is highly dependent on national idiosyncrasies and industrial structures. The internationalisation trends reveal that the non-R&D-intensive technology areas are even more strongly targeted toward international markets than high-level technologies, although technologies from non-R&D-intensive are largely positioned at the end of the innovation chain, providing rather downstream or market-oriented inventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Our matching algorithm, which is based on a Levenshtein distance, covers 93 % of all transnational filings and 81 % of patent applicants in the year 2010 and reaches a precision of 0.91 and a recall of 0.53.

  2. 2.

    From the manufacturing sectors (NACE Rev. 2, 10-33), the following 3-digit NACE codes are defined as leading-edge industries: 20.2, 21.1, 21.2, 25.4, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3, 26.5, 26.6, 26.7, 30.3, and 30.4. High-level technology industries are defined as follows: 20.1, 20.5, 22.1, 26.4, 27.1, 27.2, 27.4, 27.5, 27.9, 28.1, 28.3, 28.4, 28.9, 29.1, 29.3, 30.2, and 32.5. The remaining 66 3-digit NACE codes define the non-R&D-intensive manufacturing industries.

References

  • Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2006). Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany. Research Policy, 35, 655–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. P., Narin, F., & Woolf, P. (1981). Citation rates to technologically important patents. World Patent Information, 3(4), 160–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z., Lev, B., & Narin, F. (1999). Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1982). The economics of industrial innovation. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2006). Technological structures and performance reflected by patent indicators. In U. Schmoch, C. Rammer, & H. Legler (Eds.), National systems of innovation in comparison. Structure and performance indicators for knowledge societies. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2010). Transnational patents and international markets. Scientometrics, 82(1), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frietsch, R., Schmoch, U., van Looy, B., Walsh, J. P., Devroede, R., Du Plessis, M., et al. (2010). The value and indicator function of patents. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 15/2010, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI). Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frietsch, R., Neuhäusler, P., & Rothengatter, O. (2011). SME patenting – An empirical analysis in nine countries. Presentation at the Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy, October 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrke, B., Frietsch, R., Neuhäusler, P., Rammer, C., & Leidmann, M. (2013). Re-definition of research-intensive industries and goods – NIW/ISI/ZEW-Lists 2012. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 8-2013, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI). Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of economic literature, 28, 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H. (1998). Foundations of the economics of innovation – Theory, measurement and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günterberg, B., & Kayser, G. (2004). SMEs in Germany – Facts and figures 2004. IfM-Materialien Nr. 161, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM). Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanel, P. (2008). The use of intellectual property rights and innovation by manufacturing firms in Canada. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(4), 285–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhäusler, P. (2012). The use of patents and informal appropriation mechanisms – Differences between sectors and among companies. Technovation, 32(12), 681–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhäusler, P., Frietsch, R., & Rothengatter, O. (2014). Patent applications – structures, trends and recent developments 2013. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 4-2014, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI). Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD & Eurostat (Ed.). (2005). Oslo Manual. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD/Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleschak, F., & Sabisch, H. (1996). Innovationsmanagement. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration and impact in the optical disc industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, T., Neuhäusler, P., Frietsch, R., Rammer, C., & Hollanders, H. (2011). Innovation indicator – Methodoloy report. In BDI (Ed.), Deutsche Telekom Stiftung. Bonn: Deutsche Telekom Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovation. Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Neuhäusler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neuhäusler, P., Frietsch, R. (2015). Patent Activities in Non-R&D-Intensive Technology Areas. In: Som, O., Kirner, E. (eds) Low-tech Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09973-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics