Skip to main content

The Synergy of Rating Agencies’ Efforts: Russian Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Econometrics and Empirical Market Microstructure

Abstract

We examine the synergy of the credit rating agencies’ efforts. This question is important not only for regulators, but also for commercial banks if the implementation of the internal ratings and the advanced Basel Approach are discussed. We consider Russian commercial banks as a good example where proposal methods might be used. Firstly, a literature overview was supplemented with an analysis of the activities of rating agencies in Russia. Secondly, we discussed the methods and algorithms of the comparison of rating scales. The optimization task was formulated and the system of rating maps onto the basic scale was obtained. As a result we obtained the possibility of a comparison of different agencies’ ratings. We discussed not only the distance method, but also an econometric approach. The scheme of correspondence for Russian banks is presented and discussed. The third part of the paper presents the results of econometric modeling of the international agencies’ ratings, as well as the probability of default models for Russian banks. The models were obtained from previous papers by the author, but complex discussion and synergy of their systematic exploration were this paper’s achievement. We consider these problems using the example of financial institutions. We discuss the system of models and their implementation for practical applications towards risk management tasks, including those which are based on public information and a remote estimation of ratings. We expect the use of such a systemic approach to risk management in commercial banks as well as in regulatory borders.

The work is partially supported by the International Laboratory of Quantitative Finance, NRU HSE, RF government grant, ag. 14.A12.31.0007.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayvazyan, S., Golovan, S., Karminsky, A., & Peresetsky, A. (2011). The approaches to the comparison of rating scales. Applied Econometrics, 3, 13–40 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel. (2004). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards. A revised framework. Basel: Bank for International Settlements, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel. (2010). Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. Basel: Bank for International Settlements, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, V., & Searle, S. (1992). Bond ratings and inter-rater agreement. Journal of International Securities Markets, 6, 167–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, R., & Packer, F. (1994). The credit rating industry. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporale, G. M., Matouse, R., & Stewart, C. (2010). EU banks rating assignments: Is there heterogeneity between new and old member countries? Review of International Economics, 19(1), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carling, K., Jacobson, T., Linde, J., & Roszbach, K. (2007). Corporate credit risk modeling and the macroeconomy. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 845–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, T., Fissel, G., & Hanweck, G. (2008). Is there cyclical bias in bank holding company risk ratings? Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 1297–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G20. (2013). New rules on credit rating agencies (CRAs), European Commission, MEMO, Brussels, 16 January 2013. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-13_en.htm.

  • Hainsworth, R., Karminsky, A., & Solodkov, V. (2012). Arm’s length method for comparing rating scales. Working Paper WP BRP 01/FE/2012. Higher School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannotta, J. (2006). Testing for Opaqueness in the European banking industry: Evidence from bond credit ratings. Journal of Financial Service Researches, 30, 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karminsky, A. (2010). Rating model opportunities for emerging markets. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Challenges for Analysis of the Economy, the Businesses, and Social Progress”. Szeged: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karminsky, A., & Peresetsky, A. (2009). Ratings as measure of financial risk: Evolution, function and usage. Journal of the New Economic Association, 1–2, 86–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karminsky, A., & Sosyurko, V. (2010). Comparative analyses of rating models generation. Financial analyses: problems and solutions, 14(38), 2–9 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karminsky, A., Peresetsky, A., & Petrov, A. (2005). Ratings in the economics: Methodology and practice. In A. M. Karminsky (Ed.), Finance and statistics. Moscow (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karminsky A., Kiselev, V., & Kolesnichenko, A. (2011a). Modeling sovereign ratings: Estimators, models, forecasting. In EBES 2011 Conference – Zagreb. EBES Abstract Book, Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karminsky, A., Polozov, A., & Ermakov, S. (2011b). Encyclopedia of ratings: Economics, society, sport. Public house “Economic and Life” (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karminsky, A., Kostrov, A., & Murzenkov, T. (2012). Comparison of default probability models: Russian experience. Working Paper WP BRP 06/FE/2012 FE. Higher School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liss, H., & Fons, J. (2006, December). Mapping Moody’s national scale ratings to global scale ratings, Moody’s rating methodology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matovnikov, M. (2008). How to authorize the credit rating agencies to assess the creditworthiness of banks. Money and Credit, 12 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s. (2007). Bank financial strength ratings: Moody’s investors service, global methodology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peresetsky, A., & Karminsky, A. (2011). Models for Moody’s bank ratings. Frontiers in Finance and Economics, 1, 88–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peresetsky, A., Karminsky, A., & van Soest, A. (2004). Modeling the ratings of Russian banks. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 40(4), 10–25 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poon, W. P. H. (2003). Are unsolicited credit ratings biased downward? Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 593–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilyuk, A., Karminsky, A., & Sosyurko, V. (2011). A system of bank rating models for IRB approach: Comparison and dynamics. Working Paper WP7/2011/07, National Research University Higher School of Economics (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Karminsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karminsky, A. (2015). The Synergy of Rating Agencies’ Efforts: Russian Experience. In: Bera, A., Ivliev, S., Lillo, F. (eds) Financial Econometrics and Empirical Market Microstructure. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09946-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics