Abstract
Social network is a structure made up of a set of social actors and a set of ties between these actors. The social network provides an analysis of the structure of social entities as well as a variety of theories explaining the patterns observed in these structures (Wasserman and Faust 1994). The nodes may be individuals, groups, organizations, or societies. It is focused on uncovering the patterning of people’s interaction. These patterns are important features of the lives of the individuals. Our choices depend in large part on how that we are tied into the larger social network. In conclusion, investigating interactions is important for understanding patterns because interactions help to define and identify groups or organizations and the members within these entities. In addition, the investigation of interactions may provide a better understanding of how leaders may appear within organizations because interactions help to define structure and context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: longitudinal study. Adm Sci Q 45(3):425–455
Blau P (1960) A theory of social integration. Am J Sociol 6(65):545–556
Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916):892–895. doi:10.1126/science.1165821
Burch P, Spillane J (2004) Leading from the middle: mid-level small staff and instructional improvement. Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform, Chicago, pp 1–5
Burt R (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Burt R (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Am J Sociol 110(2):349–399
Burt R S (1997) The contingent value of social capital. Adm Sci Q 42(2):339–365
Durkheim E (1893) De la division du travail social: Étude sur l’organisation des sociétés supérieures. F. Alcan, Paris [Coser LA (trans: 1964) The division of labor in society. Free Press, New York]
Easley D, Kleinberg J (2010) Networks, crowds, and markets: reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge University Press
Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469
Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Adm Sci Q 44:82–111
Katz N, Lazer D, Arrow H, Contractor N (2004) Network theory and small groups. Small Group Res 35(3):307–322
MacIver MA, Farley E (2004) Bringing the district back in: the role of the central office in improving instruction and student achievement. Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Parsons T (1951) The social system. The Free Press, New York
Scott RW, Davis GF (2003) Networks in and around organizations. Organizations and Organizing. Pearson, Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-195893-3
Tönnies F (1887) Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Fues’s Verlag, Leipzig [Loomis CP (trans: 1957) Community and society. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing]
Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis in the social and behavioral sciences. In: Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–27. ISBN 9780521387071
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Erçetin, Ş.Ş., Neyişci, N.B. (2015). Social Networks: Connections in Structures. In: Erçetin, Ş., Banerjee, S. (eds) Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2013. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09710-7_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09710-7_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09709-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09710-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)