Skip to main content

Social Ethics

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Abstract

The ethical values and behaviors are not only abstract terms, but they are refined and conceptualized by real-life experiences. The societal context where the actions of humans can be analyzed by ethical decision-making is entirely relevant to deliberate on what is the right thing to do and what the moral agent should do, since the ethical values and principles response to the actual practices of life and to the needs of humans in the society. This elaboration takes us to the realm of social ethics.

This article reviews the definition and contextual meaning of social ethics at a broader level by giving special emphasis to the ethical theories and principles, focusing on the societal and public setting. Ethics will be deliberated with social and community aspects. Based on the principle of justice and public health ethics, the concept of social ethics has been investigated concisely through the relationship between man, as a moral person, and the society in exemplification of the issues of healthcare ethics. It is argued that the tension between individualism and communitarian needs can be reconciled with the perspective of social ethics by respecting the individual autonomy without disregarding the common good and social justice. By promoting the values of social responsibility, solidarity, and social utility, social ethics has been proposed as the basis of a rational, moral, egalitarian, pluralistic, democratic society rising on the pillars of human rights and human dignity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armstrong, A. C. (1907). Individual and social ethics. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 4(5), 119–122. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010586. Accessed 21 Sept 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L. (2003). Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L. (2008). Ethical theory and bioethics. In T. L. Beauchamp, L. R. Walters, J. P. Kahn, & A. C. Mastroianni (Eds.), Contemporary issues in bioethics (7th ed., pp. 25–26). Belmont, USA: Wadsworth Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress, J. E., Faden, R. R., Gaare, R. D., Gostin, L. O., Kahn, J., Bonnie, R. J., Kass, N. E., Mastroianni, A. C., Moreno, J. D., & Nieburg, P. (2002). Public health ethics: Mapping the terrain. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 30, 170–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craut, R. (2014). Aristotle’s ethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Principal Editor), First published Tue 1 May 2001; substantive revision Mon 21 Apr 2014, ISSN 1095–5054. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/. Accessed 26 Feb 2015

  • Di Mattia, P. (2008). Ethics. In W. Kirch (Ed.), Encyclopedia of public health. Springer Reference. www.springerreference.com. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2011-01-31 23:00:00 UTC.

  • Gillon, R. (2003). Ethics needs principles – four can encompass the rest – and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M. (2012). A utilitarian approach. In H. Kuhse & P. Singer (Eds.), A companion to bioethics (2nd ed., pp. 85–90). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévy, B. (1997). Globalisation et développement: à la recherche d’une éthique sociale. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement, 18(3), 519–534, Published online: 14 Jun 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, G. (1986). German social ethics and return to Greek Philosophy Aristotle and Marx. Studies in Soviet Thought, 31, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauer-Studer, H. (2006). Public reason and bioethics. MedGenMed, 8(4), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice (rev. ed.). Copyright 1999 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College, Printed in the United States of America. This book is a revised version of A Theory of Justice published in 1971 by Harvard University Press, Sixth Printing 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1997). The idea of public reason revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 765–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice, Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • +Richardson, H. S. (2015). John Rawls (1921–2002). The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (A peer-reviewed academic resource). In J. Fieser, B. Dawson (Eds.), ISSN 2161–0002. http://www.iep.utm.edu/. Accessed 24 Feb 2015.

  • Rozuel, C. (2013). Social contract. In S. Idowu, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, & A. Gupta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility. Springer Reference. www.springerreference.com. Berlin\Heidelberg: Springer, 2013-03-13 15:49:25 UTC

  • Schwartz, L., Preece, P. E., & Hendry, R. A. (2002). Medical ethics, a case-based approach. Edinburgh, UK: Saunders Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2009). Responsible conduct of research (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R. M. (2003). The basics of bioethics (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Anand, S., Peter, F., & Sen, A. (Eds.). (2009). Public health, ethics, and equity. New York: Oxford University Press (Reprinted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. (2010). Health-care delivery and resource allocation. In R. M. Veatch (Ed.), Medical ethics (2nd ed.) (pp. 321–361). Mississagua, Canada: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, W. (2008). Ethics of health promotion. In K. Heggenhougen (editor-in-chief), & S. Quah (Associate editor-in-chief), International encyclopedia of public health: Vol. 2. (pp. 477–482). Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T. (2005). Human rights and global health: A research program. Metaphilosophy, 36(1–2), 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikler, D., & Marchand, S. (2012). Society’s allocation of resources for health. In H. Kuhse & P. Singer (Eds.), A companion to bioethics (Blackwell companions to philosophy 2nd ed., Vol. VIII, pp. 351–361). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank my colleagues, Nadi Bakirci, MD, PhD, professor of Public Health and Pinar Topsever, MD, PhD, associate professor of Family Medicine for their inspirations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yesim Isil Ulman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ulman, Y.I. (2016). Social Ethics. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_395

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics