Skip to main content

Neuroethics

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

Neuroethics lies at the intersection of the clinical brain sciences, psychology, law, and moral philosophy. Although neuroethics overlaps to some extent with traditional issues in bioethics, it should not be categorized as a subdivision of bioethics. The connections between the brain and behavior explored by the neurosciences raise a distinctive set of ethical questions from those in traditional areas of bioethics. Neuroethics can be divided into the ethics of neuroscience and the neuroscience of ethics. The first branch involves questions such as the ratio of risks to benefits for patients taking psychotropic drugs or undergoing neurosurgical procedures and whether they have the mental capacity to give informed consent to these interventions. The second branch involves investigating the neurobiological basis of moral reasoning and decision-making through brain imaging. After providing a historical background of the field and key definitions, this chapter discusses the three currently most debated topics in neuroethics: brain imaging to assess moral and legal responsibility; cognitive enhancement through psychopharmacology; and the use of imaging and other techniques to diagnose and treat prolonged disorders of consciousness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Burns, J., & Swerdlow, R. (2003). Right orbitofrontal tumor with pedophilia symptom and constructional apraxia sign. Archives of Neurology, 62, 437–440. doi:10.1001/archneur.60.3.437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow and the feeling brain. Orlando: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M., & Wolpe, P. (2004). Monitoring and manipulating brain function: New neuroscience technologies and their ethical implications. Hastings Center Report, 34(3), 35–45. doi:10.2307/3528418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Espejo, D., & Owen, A. (2013). Detecting awareness after severe brain injury. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 801–809. doi:10.1038/nrn3608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greely, H., Sahakian, B., Harris, J., Kessler, R., Gazzaniga, M., Campbell, P., & Farah, M. (2008). Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature, 450, 702–705. doi:10.1038/456702a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iuculano, T., & Cohen, K. R. (2013). The mental cost of cognitive enhancement. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 4482–4486. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4927-12.2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juengst, E. (1997). What does ‘enhancement’ mean? In E. Parens (Ed.), Enhancing human traits: Ethical and social implications (pp. 29–47). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. (2008). Consciousness unchained: Ethical issues and the vegetative and minimally conscious state. AJOB-Neuroscience, 8(9), 1–2. doi:10.1080/15265160802414524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzinger, T., & Hildt, E. (2011). Cognitive enhancement. In J. Illes & B. Sahakian (Eds.), Oxford handbook of neuroethics (pp. 245–264). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskies, A. (2002). Neuroethics for the new millennium. Neuron, 35, 21–23. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)007638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskies, A. (2013). Brain imaging techniques. In A. Roskies & S. Morse (Eds.), A primer of criminal law and neuroscience (pp. 37–74). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of Physicians (UK). (2013). Prolonged disorders of consciousness: National clinical guideline. London, UK. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/prolonged_disorders_of_consciousness_national_clinical_guidelines

  • Safire, W. (2002). Visions for a new field of neuroethics. In S. Marcus (Ed.), Neuroethics: Mapping the field (pp. 3–9). New York: Dana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D., Kahane, G., Horne, M., & Savulescu, J. (2009). Functional neuroimaging and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from vegetative patients. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 508–511. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.029165.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Farah, M. (Ed.). (2010). Neuroethics: An introduction with readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glannon, W. (2007). Bioethics and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glannon, W. (2011). Brain, body and mind: Neuroethics with a human face. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, N. (2007). Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I am grateful to a referee for helpful comments on an earlier version of this chapter

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Glannon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Glannon, W. (2016). Neuroethics. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_307

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics