Abstract
Should global bioethics and international human rights be considered to arise from the same idealistic human urge to shape our interactions by universally applicable principle? Are both being threatened by the narrower greed and profit-focused principles driving corporate globalization? “Positivist” theories assert human rights (unlike bioethical principles) derive from rules of recognition embedded in four primary legal systems: international law, constitutional law, legislation, and judicial decisions applying common law precedents. In such a scheme, bioethics represents inchoate or potential legal norms that lack the economic clout that trade sanctions, for example, give otherwise more normatively problematic trade and investment agreements. One approach to “natural law” jurisprudence views human rights and bioethics, however, as presumptively cohering with principles implicit in the nature of human interactions and in reality when understood at its most fundamental and ideal forms. From such a perspective, the visionary project to develop both human rights and bioethics as counters to global corporate power exerted through trade and investment agreements may be merging into a normative quest to develop enforceable principles that encourage respect for all forms of life, not merely that of humans.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashcroft, R. E. (2010). Could human rights supersede bioethics? Human Rights Law Review, 10(4), 639–660.
Baker, B. (2001). Bioethics and human rights: A historical perspective. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 10, 241–252.
Dewhurst, K. (1995). Sydenham’s letters to John Locke. Practitioner, 175, 314–324.
Faunce, T. A. (2005). Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO universal bioethics declaration. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 173–178.
Faunce, T. A. (2007). Who owns our health. Medical professionalism, law and leadership beyond the age of the market state. Sydney NSW and Baltimore: University of NSW Press/Johns Hopkins University Press.
Faunce, T. A. (Ed.). (2015). Nanotechnology toward the sustainocene. Singapore: Pan Stanford.
Gordijn, B., & ten Have, H. (2014). Future perspectives. In H. ten Have & B. Gordijn (Eds.), Handbook of global bioethics (pp. 829–844). Dordrecht: Springer.
Knowles, L. P. (2001). The lingua franca of human rights and the rise of a global bioethic. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 10, 253–263.
Sell, S. K. (2003). Private power, public law. The globalisation of intellectual property rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
United Nations. (1945). United Nations statute of the ICJ 1945. UNTS; 1: xvi.
United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. Adopted 10 Dec 1948. GA Res 217A (III). UN doc A/810 (1948) 71.
United Nations. (1966a). International covenant on civil and political rights. Adopted 16 Dec 1966, entry into force 23 March 1976. GA Res 2200A (XXI). UN GAOR supp (no 16) 52. UN doc A/6316 (1966). UNTS; 999: 17.
United Nations. (1966b). International covenant on economic, cultural and social rights. Adopted 16 Dec 1966, entry into force 3 Jan 1976. GA Res 2200A(XXI). UN Doc A/6316 (1966). UNTS; 993: 3.
United Nations. (2000). Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No 14 on the Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health in Article 12 ICECSR e/C.12/2000/4 11/08/2000.
Further Readings
Ashcroft, R. E. (2010). Could human rights supersede bioethics? Human Rights Law Review, 10(4), 639–660.
Baker, B. (2001). Bioethics and human rights: A historical perspective. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 10, 241–252.
Gordijn, B., & ten Have, H. (2014). Future perspectives. In H. ten Have & B. Gordijn (Eds.), Handbook of global bioethics (pp. 829–844). Dordrecht: Springer.
Knowles, L. P. (2001). The lingua franca of human rights and the rise of a global bioethic. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 10, 253–263.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Faunce, T. (2016). Human Rights. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_232
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_232
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09482-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09483-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities