Abstract
Obesity can nowadays be considered a disease with a multifactorial origin. Genes, socioeconomic status, dietary patterns, and psychological profile are only some of the factors that may lead to excess body weight and its deleterious outcomes. A correct assessment of an obese patient cannot be merely limited to weight evaluation, it must consider other aspects such as, among others, biochemical parameters, clinical conditions, and physical fitness. Given its complexity, it has been demonstrated that a multidisciplinary approach is more effective than a single-clinician one in terms of weight loss and comorbidities improvement. Ideally, an obesity management team should be composed of several health professionals such as endocrinologist, clinical nutritionist, a psychiatrist, a bariatric surgeon, and a physiatrist together with other health professionals (i.e., dietitian, psychologist, physiotherapist, nurse). In order to manage every obese subject in an effective manner, different levels of care should be considered: primary care, outpatient clinics held by a multidisciplinary equipe, day hospital, residential rehabilitation treatment, and hospitalization. Although an interdisciplinary approach is advisable in treating obesity, some disadvantages must be considered. In case of a defective communication among team members, there is a risk of losing the full picture of the patient who in turn could receive conflicting advice from each health professional. Moreover, multidisciplinary approach is much more time-consuming than a diet-only treatment, limiting its accessibility to those whose schedules are very flexible. In conclusion, an interdisciplinary approach is to be considered the treatment of choice in the obese patient, but a lot is still to be improved, especially in terms of health professionals’ education to teamwork.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tsigos C, Hainer V, Basdevant A et al (2008) Management of obesity in adults: European clinical practice guidelines. Obes Facts 1:106–116
Donini LM, Dalle Grave R, Caretto A, Lucchin L (2013) From simplicity towards complexity: the Italian multidimensional approach to obesity. Eat Weight Disord. doi:10.1007/s40519-013-0097-9
Donini LM, Cuzzolaro M, Spera G et al (2010) Obesity and eating disorders. Indications for the different levels of care. An Italian expert consensus document. Eat Weight Disord 15(1–2 Suppl):1–31
Sbraccia P, Vettor R (2012) SIO, Societa’ Italiana dell’Obesita’ e ADI, Associazione Dietetica Italiana. Standard italiani per la cura dell’obesita’ 2012–2013. SIO, Societa’ Italiana dell’Obesita’, Roma
Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight in Adults (1998) Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: executive summary. Am J Clin Nutr 68(4):899–917
Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD et al (2013) AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Am Coll Cardiol 63(25 Pt B):2985–3023. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004
Enright PL, McBurnie MA, Bittner V, Tracy RP et al (2002) Cardiovascular health study: the 6-min walk test: a quick measure of functional status in elderly adults. Chest 122:387–398
ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function (2002) ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:111–117
Borg G (1990) Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health 16(Suppl 1):55–58
Andrews AW, Thomas MW, Bohannon RW (1996) Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers. Phys Ther 76:248–259
Donini LM (2013) Debate on obesity medicine. Endocr Pract 19(1):169
Dalle Grave R, Calugi S, El Ghoch M (2013) Lifestyle modification in the management of obesity: achievements and challenges. Eat Weight Disord 18(4):339–349
Wing RR, Bolin P, Look AHEAD Research Group et al (2013) Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 369(2):145–154
Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M et al (2004) Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 351(26):2683–2693
Donini LM, Savina L, Castellaneta E, Coletti C et al (2009) Multidisciplinary approach to obesity. Eating Weight Disord 14:23–32
Donini LM, Cuzzolaro M, Spera G, Badiali M (2010) Obesity and eating disorders. Indications for the different levels of care. An Italian expert consensus document. Eating Weight Disord 15(1–2 Suppl):1–31
Upshur R, Tracy S (2008) Chronicity and complexity. Is what’s good for the diseases always good for the patients? Can Fam Phys 54:1655–1658
Stans S, Stevens J, Beurskens A (2013) Interprofessional practice in primary care: development of a tailored process model. J Multidiscip Healthc 6:139–147
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mariani, S., Watanabe, M., Lubrano, C., Basciani, S., Migliaccio, S., Gnessi, L. (2015). Interdisciplinary Approach to Obesity. In: Lenzi, A., Migliaccio, S., Donini, L. (eds) Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09045-0_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09045-0_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09044-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09045-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)