Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender Ideology and Work–Family Plans of the Next Generation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender and the Work-Family Experience

Abstract

This chapter examines gender and ideological differences in work-family balance expectations of adolescents and emerging adults. The chapter examines relevant research discussing such considerations, in addition to using data from two studies to further illustrate the chapter topic. In both studies (one using 15-year-olds, one using college undergraduates), individuals expected to balance work and family in a traditional, gendered way, with men expecting to work full-time before and after children, and women expecting to reduce/end working outside the home after children. Before children, both male and female emerging adults with traditional gender ideologies reported fewer hours of work than those who were more egalitarian. After children, gender ideology was important for female but not male work expectations: for young women, more traditional gender ideology predicted greater expectations of part- rather than full-time employment. Otherwise, gender ideology operated similarly for both genders. Idealized expectations were also evident, as both young men and women reported planning on sharing primary caregiving responsibilities, despite endorsing a traditional gendered employment pattern. Implications for gender inequality in the workforce and potential consequences for the next generation are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alessandri, S. M. (1992). Effects of maternal work status in single-parent families on children’s perception of self and family and school achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 417–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for? Child Development Perspectives, 1, 68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baber, K. M., & Monaghan, P. (1988). College women’s career and motherhood expectations–New options, old dilemmas. Sex Roles, 19, 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, K. (1993). Changing assumptions and contingent solutions: The costs and benefits of women working full- and part-time. Sex Roles, 28, 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (2010). The revolution in the economic empowerment of women. http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/2010/01/the-revolution-in-the-economic-empowerment-of-women-becker.html. Accessed 3 June 2012.

  • Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolzendahl, C., & Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Social Forces, 83, 759–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boushey, H. (2008). “Opting out?” The effect of children on women’ employment in the United States. Feminist Economist, 14, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, K. L., & Padavic, I. (2000). Change in gender ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 62, 477–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2004). The transformation of U.S. gender role attitudes: Cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33, 106–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (Dec 2010). Women in the labor force: A databook. http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2010.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2012.

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (April 2012). Employment characteristics of families summary. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/famee.nr0.htm. Accessed 2 June 2012.

  • Coltrane, S. (1989). Household labor and the routine production of gender. Social Problems, 36, 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corder, J., & Stephan, C. W. (1984). Females combination of work and family roles-adolescents aspirations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology 106(6), 1691–1730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, D., Hermsen, J. M., & Vanneman, R. (2011). The End of the Gender Revolution? Gender Role Attitudes From 1977 to 2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 259–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. N., & Pearce, L. D. (2007). Adolescents’ work-family gender ideologies and educational expectations. Sociological Perspectives, 50, 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Valk, H. A. (2008). Parental influence on work and family plans of adolescents of different ethnic backgrounds in the Netherlands. Sex Roles, 59, 738–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennehy, K., & Mortimer, J. T. (1993). Work and family orientations of contemporary adolescent boys and girls. In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 87–107). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dex, S. (2010). Can state policies produce equality in housework? In J. Treas & S. Drobnic (Eds.), Dividing the domestic: Men, women, and housework in cross-national perspective. Palo Alto: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drobnic, S. (2010). Concluding thoughts on the societal context of housework. In J. Treas & S. Drobnic (Eds.), Dividing the domestic: Men, women, and household work in cross-national perspective. (pp. 241–251). Palo Alto: Stanford University.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Drobnic, S., & Witting, I. (1997). Part-time work in the United States of America. In H. P. Blossfield & C. Hakim (Eds.), Between equalization and marginalization: Women working part-time in Europe and the United States of America (pp. 289–314). New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. John M. MacEachran memorial lecture series; 1985. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 485–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Hoffman, L. W. (1984). Sex roles, socialization, and occupational behavior. Child development research and social policy: Harold W. Stevenson & Alberta E. Siegel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco, J. L., Sabattini, L., & Crosby, F. J. (2004). Anticipating work and family: Exploring the associations among gender-related ideologies, values, and behaviors in Latino and White families in the United States. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 755–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuegen, K., Biernal, M., Haines, E., & Deaux, K. (2004). Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgements of job-related consequences. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 737–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, N. L. (2004). Gender and gender role development in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Psychology (pp. 233–262). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, W. A. (2014). Father time: The social clock and the timing of fatherhood. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, W. A., & Lucas-Thompson, R. (2014). Stereotype accuracy: Do college women hit or miss the mark when estimating the “impact” of maternal employment on children’s achievement and behavior? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, W. A., Kelly, E., Matthews, N. B., Kang, H., Li, W., & Sumaroka, M. (2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same: Gender, culture, and college students’ views about work and family. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 814–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, W. A., Michaels, G. Y., & Lamb, M. E. (1985). Husbands’ and wives’ adjustment to pregnancy and first parenthood. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 483–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., Katz, L. F., & Kuziemko, I. (2006). The homecoming of American college women: The reversal of the college gender gap. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., Katz, L. F. (2008). Transitions: Career and Family Lifecycles of the Educational Elite. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 98, (2), 363–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, E., Goldberg, W. A., Crawford, T. J., & Granger, J. (1988). Beliefs about the consequences of maternal employment for children. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 35–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: Effects on marital quality. Social Forces, 74, 1029–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. (2006). The consequences of maternal employment during men’s childhood for their adult housework performance. Gender & Society, 20, 60–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, W. J., Ruhm, C. J., Waldfogel, J., & Washbrook, E. (2008). The timing of mothers’ employment after childbirth. Monthly Labor Review, 131, 15–27.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, J. H., & Hayford, S. R. (2012). Opting In: Adolescent girls’ work and family plans. paper submitted at the inaugural work and family researchers network conference. New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. M., Duncan, G. J., & Boisjoly, J. (2002). Evaluating the role of “nothing to lose” attitudes on risky behavior in adolescence. Social Forces, 80, 1005–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegewisch, A., & Gornick, J. C. (2011). The impact of work-family policies on women’s employment: A review of research from the OECD countries. Community, Work, & Family, 14, 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & J. Petersen (Eds.), Girls at puberty: Biological and psychosocial perspectives (pp. 201–228). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Himsel, A. J., & Goldberg, W. A. (2003). Social comparisons and satisfaction with the division of housework: Implications for men’s and women’s role strain. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 843–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. W. (1980). The effects of maternal employment on the academic attitudes and performance of school-age children. School Psychology Review, 9, 319–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Economic Committee Majority Staff, U. S. C. (Dec 2010). Invest in women, invest in America: A comprehensive review of women in the U.S. Economy. http://jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=Reports1&ContentRecord_id=11dd6449-8d54-41ff-9bb2-87d98cbf66c2&ContentType_id=efc78dac-24b1-4196-a730-d48568b9a5d7&Group_id=c120e658-3d60-470b-a8a1-6d2d8fc30132. Accessed 2 June 2012.

  • Kaufman, G., & Uhlenberg, P. (2000). The influence of parenthood on the work effort of married men and women. Social Forces, 78, 931–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerpelman, J. L., & Schvaneveldt, P. L. (1999). Young adults’ anticipated identity importance of career, marital, and parental roles: Comparisons of men and women with different role balance orientations. Sex Roles, 41, 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreider, R. M., & Elliott, D. R. (2009). America’s families and living arrangements 2007. Current Population Reports, P20-561. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroska, A. (2007). Gender ideology and gender role ideology. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (Vol. 4, pp. 1867–1868). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, L. (2011). Maternity leave and employment patterns of first-time mothers: 1961–2008. Current Population Report, P70-128. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machung, A. (1989). Talking career, thinking job-Gender differences in career and family expectations of Berkeley seniors. Feminist Studies, 15, 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P., Pini, B., Bailey, J., & Price, R. (2011). Young people’s aspirations for education, work, family and leisure. Work, Employment and Society, 25, 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P., & Yu, Y. (2000). Effective work/life strategies: Working couples, work conditions, gender, and life quality. Social Problems, 47, 291–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, S. L. (1998). Marriage in men’s lives. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, L., Betz, M., & Kurth, S. (1989). Plans for balancing work and family-life-Do women pursuing nontraditional and traditional occupations differ? Sex Roles, 20, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orbuch, T. L., & Eyster, S. L. (1997). Division of household labor among Black couples White couples. Social Forces, 76, 301–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, K., & Wang, W. (2013). Modern parenthood: Roles of moms and dads converge as they balance work and family. Pew Research: Social & Demographic Trends. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/03/14/modern-parenthood-roles-of-moms-and-dads-converge-as-they-balance-work-and-family/. Accessed 5 Sep 2013.

  • Pew Research Center. (2010). The decline of marriage and rise of new families. Washington: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2013). On pay gap, millenial women near parity-For now. Washington: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, R. A. (2008). A detailed look at parental leave policies in 21 OECD countries. Washington: U.S. Center for Economic and Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, R. A., Gornick, J. C., & Schmitt, J. (2009). Parental leave policies in 21 countries: Assessing generosity and gender equality. Washington: U.S. Center for Economic and Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18, 510–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmela-Aro, K., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2007). Personal goals during emerging adulthood: A 10-year follow up. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 690–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. H., & Hauser, R. M. (1980). The Wisconsin longitudinal study of social and psychological factors in aspirations and achievements. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 1, 59–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, O. (2010). Ambivalent attitudes, contradictory institutions ambivalence in gender-role attitudes in comparative perspective. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 51, 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steil, J. M. (2000). Contemporary marriage: Still an unequal partnership. In C. Hendrick & S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 125–152). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvester, K. (2001). Caring for our youngest: Public attitudes in the United States. (Review). The Future of children/Center for the Future of Children, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, 11, 52–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 1009–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, N. W. (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work, and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2011). The 2011 statistical abstract. http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/labor_force_employment_earnings.html.

  • Weinshenker, M. N. (2006). Adolescents’ expectations about mothers’ employment: Life course patterns and parental influence. Sex Roles, 54, 845–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, A. J., & Lucas-Thompson, R. G. (2012). Authenticity in college-aged males and females, how close others are perceived, and mental health outcomes. Sex Roles, 67, 334–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, B. S., & Freund, A. M. (2011). Parents as role models: Parental behavior affects adolescents’ plans for work involvement. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 218–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development and Family Studies and Colorado School of Public Health, Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1570, Behavioral Sciences Building Room 419, 80523, Fort Collins, CO, USA

    Rachel G. Lucas-Thompson PhD

  2. Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, 4564 Social and Behavior Sciences Gateway, 92697, Irvine, CA, USA

    Wendy A. Goldberg PhD

Authors
  1. Rachel G. Lucas-Thompson PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wendy A. Goldberg PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel G. Lucas-Thompson PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Psychology and Management, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, USA

    Maura J. Mills

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lucas-Thompson, R., Goldberg, W. (2015). Gender Ideology and Work–Family Plans of the Next Generation. In: Mills, M. (eds) Gender and the Work-Family Experience. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08891-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation