Skip to main content

Approximating the Revenue Maximization Problem with Sharp Demands

  • Conference paper
Algorithm Theory – SWAT 2014 (SWAT 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8503))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider the revenue maximization problem with sharp multi-demand, in which m indivisible items have to be sold to n potential buyers. Each buyer i is interested in getting exactly d i items, and each item j gives a benefit v ij to buyer i. We distinguish between unrelated and related valuations. In the former case, the benefit v ij is completely arbitrary, while, in the latter, each item j has a quality q j , each buyer i has a value v i and the benefit v ij is defined as the product v i q j . The problem asks to determine a price for each item and an allocation of bundles of items to buyers with the aim of maximizing the total revenue, that is, the sum of the prices of all the sold items. The allocation must be envy-free, that is, each buyer must be happy with her assigned bundle and cannot improve her utility. We first prove that, for related valuations, the problem cannot be approximated to a factor O(m 1 − ε), for any ε > 0, unless P = NP and that such result is asymptotically tight. In fact we provide a simple m-approximation algorithm even for unrelated valuations. We then focus on an interesting subclass of “proper” instances, that do not contain buyers a priori known not being able to receive any item. For such instances, we design an interesting 2-approximation algorithm and show that no (2 − ε)-approximation is possible for any 0 < ε ≤ 1, unless P = NP. We observe that it is possible to efficiently check if an instance is proper, and if discarding useless buyers is allowed, an instance can be made proper in polynomial time, without worsening the value of its optimal solution.

This work was partially supported by the PRIN 2010–2011 research project ARS TechnoMedia: “Algorithmics for Social Technological Networks” funded by the Italian Ministry of University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aggarwal, G., Feder, T., Motwani, R., Zhu, A.: Algorithms for Multi-Product Pricing. In: Díaz, J., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A., Sannella, D. (eds.) ICALP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3142, pp. 72–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bezjian-Avery, A., Calder, B., Iacobucci, D.: New Media Interative Advertising vs. Traditional Advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 23–32 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bilò, V., Flammini, M., Monaco, G.: Approximating the Revenue Maximization Problem with Sharp Demands. CoRR, arXiv:1312.3892 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Briest, P.: Uniform Budgets and the Envy-Free Pricing Problem. In: Aceto, L., Damgård, I., Goldberg, L.A., Halldórsson, M.M., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Walukiewicz, I. (eds.) ICALP 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5125, pp. 808–819. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Chalermsook, P., Chuzhoy, J., Kannan, S., Khanna, S.: Improved Hardness Results for Profit Maximization Pricing Problems with Unlimited Supply. In: Gupta, A., Jansen, K., Rolim, J., Servedio, R. (eds.) APPROX 2012 and RANDOM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7408, pp. 73–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Chalermsook, P., Laekhanukit, B., Nanongkai, D.: Independent Set, Induced Matching, and Pricing: Connections and Tight (Subexponential Time) Approximation Hardnesses. In: Proceedings of FOCS 2013, pp. 370–379 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chalermsook, P., Laekhanukit, B., Nanongkai, D.: Graph Products Revisited: Tight Approximation Hardness of Induced Matching, Poset Dimension and More. In: Proceedings of SODA 2013, pp. 1557–1576 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, N., Deng, X.: Envy-Free Pricing in Multi-item Markets. In: Abramsky, S., Gavoille, C., Kirchner, C., Meyer auf der Heide, F., Spirakis, P.G. (eds.) ICALP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6199, pp. 418–429. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, N., Deng, X., Goldberg, P.W., Zhang, J.: On Revenue Maximization with Sharp Multi-Unit Demands. In: CoRR, arXiv:1210.0203 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, N., Ghosh, A., Vassilvitskii, S.: Optimal Envy-Free Pricing with Metric Substitutability. SIAM Journal on Computing 40(3), 623–645 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Demaine, E.D., Feige, U., Hajiaghayi, M., Salavatipour, M.R.: Combination Can Be Hard: Approximability of the Unique Coverage Problem. SIAM Journal on Computing 38(4), 1464–1483 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Deng, X., Goldberg, P., Sun, Y., Tang, B., Zhang, J.: Pricing Ad Slots with Consecutive Multi-unit Demand. In: Vöcking, B. (ed.) SAGT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8146, pp. 255–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Deng, X., Goldberg, P.W., Tang, B., Zhang, J.: Multi-unit Bayesian Auction with Demand or Budget Constraints. In: Proceedings of WIT-EC 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Deng, X., Sun, Y., Yin, M., Zhou, Y.: Mechanism Design for Multi-slot Ads Auction in Sponsored Search Markets. In: Lee, D.-T., Chen, D.Z., Ying, S. (eds.) FAW 2010. LNCS, vol. 6213, pp. 11–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M., Schwarz, M.: Internet Advertising and the Generalized Second-Price Auction. American Economic Review 97(1), 242–259 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Feldman, M., Fiat, A., Leonardi, S., Sankowski, P.: Revenue Maximizing Envy-Free Multi-Unit Auctions with Budgets. In: Proceedings of EC 2012, pp. 532–549 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Foley, D.: Resource Allocation and the Public Sector. Yale Economic Essays 7, 45–98 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Glynn, P., Rusmevichientong, P., Van Roy, B.: A Non-Parametric Approach to Multi-Product Pricing. Operations Research 54(1), 82–98 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Guruswami, V., Hartline, J.D., Karlin, A.R., Kempe, D., Kenyon, C., McSherry, F.: On Profit-Maximizing Envy-Free Pricing. In: Proceedings of SODA 2005, pp. 1164–1173 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hartline, J.D., Yan, Q.: Envy, Truth, and Profit. In: Proceedings of EC 2011, pp. 243–252 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nisan, N., et al.: Google’s Auction for TV Ads. In: Albers, S., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., Matias, Y., Nikoletseas, S., Thomas, W. (eds.) ICALP 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5556, pp. 309–327. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenkrans, G.: The Creativeness and Effectiveness of Online Interactive Rich Media Advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising 9(2) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shocker, A.D., Srinivasan, V.: Multiattribute Approaches for Product Concept Evaluation and Generation: A Critical Review. Journal of Marketing Research 16, 159–180 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. Journal of Finance 16, 8–37 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Walras, L.: Elements of Pure Economics. Allen and Unwin (1954)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bilò, V., Flammini, M., Monaco, G. (2014). Approximating the Revenue Maximization Problem with Sharp Demands. In: Ravi, R., Gørtz, I.L. (eds) Algorithm Theory – SWAT 2014. SWAT 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8503. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08404-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08404-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08403-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08404-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics