Skip to main content

Moving Toward Web 2.0-Enhanced E-Government in Small-Town Pennsylvania

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Case Studies in e-Government 2.0

Abstract

This chapter on adoption and use of Web 2.0 technologies by local governments in Pennsylvania represents a part of an ongoing research project to investigate the nature and extent of collaborative initiatives between public and academic institutions in small college towns in support of e-government innovation. In this research, e-government is approached as a sociotechnical, dynamic system situated within a complex context (people, technology, and location). The case study was guided by a combination of socio-technical theory and grounded theory. A study of one municipality in Central Pennsylvania (USA) revealed the transformative potential of e-government through the adoption of Web 2.0 technologies. The municipal social media toolbox offered citizens a variety of complementary yet unique ways (e.g., Facebook and Twitter) to stay connected with their municipal government and its various departments. The study identified four major purposes of social media integration, including emergency notification, citizen participation, public safety, and promotion of the official municipal website. This case represents a continuum of e-government adoption and municipal transformation from addressing problems and challenges along the way to finding successful solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to World Internet Stats (http://www.internetworldstats.com/america.htm#us), on 30 September 2012, there were 166,029,240 Facebook subscribers, with penetration rate of 52.9 %.

  2. 2.

    Based on modified Gumprecht’s (2008) classification of American college towns.

  3. 3.

    Codes of Ordinances of the Borough of State College, https://pastatecollege2.civicplus.com/index.aspx?NID=1276.

  4. 4.

    The municipality operates under the terms and provisions of the Home Rule Charter since 1976.

  5. 5.

    https://pa-statecollege2.civicplus.com/index.aspx?nid=2050.

  6. 6.

    Pennsylvania State University—University Park, http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/pennsylvania-state-university-university-park-6965.

  7. 7.

    Alliance for Innovation (http://transformgov.org/en/home is an international network of progressive governments and partners committed to transforming local government by accelerating the development and dissemination of innovations).

  8. 8.

    Civic Plus (http://www.civicplus.com), the leading developer of government websites and online community engagement systems.

  9. 9.

    Peak Democracy (http://www.peakdemocracy.com) develops Internet software that augments and diversifies online civic engagement in ways that can increase public trust in government.

  10. 10.

    State College YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/StateCollegeBorough.

  11. 11.

    State College Crime Map, http://youtu.be/hEyQ9FnIylI.

  12. 12.

    State College Police Crime Reports, http://www.statecollegepa.us/index.aspx?nid=27.

References

  • Anttiroiko, A. (2010). Innovation in democratic E-governance: Benefitting from Web 2.0 applications in the public sector. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 6(2), 18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of policies on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran, L., Nicholls, J., Henney, A., et al. (2005). The contribution of sociotechnical systems thinking to the effective adoption of e-Government and the enhancement of democracy. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 3(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, W. D. (2005). Government 2.0: Using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock, and enhance democracy. New York: Rowan & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., & Loo, P. (2009). Web 2.0 and E-government at the municipal level. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on E-government (ICEG 2009), 19–20 October 2009, Boston, MA. Reading: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, A. T. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, R. C. (2012). E-Government meets social media: Realities and risks. IT Professional, 14(6), 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanaugh, A. L., Fox, E. A., Sheetz, S. D., et al. (2012). Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 480–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzma, J. (2010). Asian government usage of web 2.0 social media. European Journal of ePractice, 9(3), 1–13. http://www.epracticejournal.eu. Accessed 4 Oct 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A. (2011). Evolution of local e-government in Central Pennsylvania: History of design and development of the State College Borough website (Master’s Thesis). https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/browse/author/L/. Accessed 15 Oct 2013.

  • Mergel, I. (2010). Government 2.0 revisited: Social media strategies in the public sector. PA Times, 33(3), 7, 10. (PA Times is a publication of the American Society for Public Administration)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mergel, I., Schweik, C., & Fountain, J. (2009, June 1). The Transformational Effect of Web 2.0 Technologies on Government [Working paper]. Social Science Research Network (SSRN): http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1412796. Accessed 4 Oct 2013.

  • Obama, B. (2009). Presidential memorandum: Transparency and open government. Washington, DC: The White House. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Transparency_and_Open_Government/. Accessed 13 Oct 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peedu, G., & Lamas, D. (2011). Exploring the effects of enabling Web 2.0 in e-government services. Information reuse and integration (IRI), 2011 IEEE International Conference, 3–5 August 2011, pp. 507–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, B. J. (2012). Social media sites at the state and local levels: Operational success and governance failure. State and Local Government Review, 44(1), 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrik, K. (2010). Deliberation and collaboration in the policy process: A Web 2.0 approach. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 2(1), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddick, C. G., & Aikins, S. K. (Eds.). (2012). Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance: Political, policy and management implications. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems. In A. H. VandeVen & W. F. Joyce (Eds.), Perspectives on organization design and behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Levy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levy, A., Trauth, E., Bagby, J. (2015). Moving Toward Web 2.0-Enhanced E-Government in Small-Town Pennsylvania. In: Boughzala, I., Janssen, M., Assar, S. (eds) Case Studies in e-Government 2.0. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08081-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics