Skip to main content

The Effect of Consistency Between Leadership and Technology on Knowledge Integration in GDTs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems, Management, Organization and Control

Abstract

The literature on distributed work has recognized the importance of enhancing our understanding of how leadership processes change in globally distributed teams (GDTs), and of the interplay between leadership processes and the use of collaborative technologies. However, we still find limited, and sometimes contradictory, empirical evidence on the topic. Following the theoretical framework of e-leadership, the aim of this paper is to explore how emergent and formal leadership processes co-evolve with the use of collaborative technologies in GDTs and their influence on team performance. We conducted a multiple case study in five GDTs engaged in scientific collaborations. Our analysis suggests that the attainment of consistency between leadership processes and technology use is related to better knowledge integration, which is an important antecedent of overall team performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. O’Leary, M.B., Cummings, J.N.: The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Q. 31(3), 433–452 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avolio, B.J., Walumbwa, F., Weber, T.: Leadership: current theories, research, and future directions. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 60, 421–449 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Avolio, B.J., Kahai, S.S.: Adding the “E” to e-leadership: how it may impact your leadership. Org. Dyn. 31(4), 325–338 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas, D.M., Bostrom, R.P.: Vital signs for virtual teams: an empirically developed trigger model for technology adaptation interventions. MIS Q. 34(1), 115–142 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Piccoli, G., Ives, B.: Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Q. 27(3), 365–395 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kayworth, T.R., Leidner, D.E.: Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 18(3), 7–40 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S.: Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yoo, Y., Alavi, M.: Emergent leadership in virtual teams: what do emergent leaders do? Inf. Organ. 14(1), 27–58 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Avolio, B.J., Kahai, S., Dodge, G.E.: E-leadership: implications for theory, research, and practice. Leadersh. Q. 11(4), 615–668 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiao, Y., Seagull, F.J., Mackenzie, C.F., Klein, K.J., Ziegert, J.: Adaptation of team communication patterns. In: Weisband, S. (ed.) Exploring the Effects of Leadership at a Distance: Task Urgency, and shared Team Experience in Leadership at a Distance: Research in Technologically-Supported Work, pp. 71–96. Erlbaum, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kruempel, K.: Making the right (interactive) moves for knowledge-producing tasks in computer-mediated groups. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 43(2), 185–195 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.S.: Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5, 121–194 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4, 74–81 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, Newbury Park (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crowston, K., Misiolek, N.I., Heckman, R.: Leadership in self-managing virtual teams. Working paper, Syracuse University School of Information Studies (2010). http://crowston.syr.edu/content/leadership-self-managing-virtual-teams. Accessed 3 May 2013

  16. Mattarelli, E., Bertolotti, F., Macrì, D.M.: The use of ethnography and grounded theory in the development of a management information system. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 26–44 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gardner, H.K., Gino, F., Staats, B.R.: Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: transforming resources into performance. Acad. Manag. J. 55(4), 998–1022 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenza Poliandri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Poliandri, V., Mattarelli, E., Bertolotti, F., Tagliaventi, M.R., Grandi, A. (2014). The Effect of Consistency Between Leadership and Technology on Knowledge Integration in GDTs. In: Baglieri, D., Metallo, C., Rossignoli, C., Pezzillo Iacono, M. (eds) Information Systems, Management, Organization and Control. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07905-9_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics