Skip to main content

Livelihoods Heterogeneity and Water Management in Malawi: Policy Implications for Irrigation Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Challenges and Opportunities for Agricultural Intensification of the Humid Highland Systems of Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

A study was conducted among 92 Nkhotakota Bua watershed irrigation households in Malawi to assess the extent of livelihoods heterogeneity and its impact on household water management choices. The study determined the economic importance of irrigation in relation to other livelihoods as a heterogeneity factor. Dichotomizing the livelihoods into water and non-water dependent provided a better framework for augmenting the heterogeneity of “irrigation livelihoods”. Using a livelihood approach, the study further explored determinants of livelihood diversity and factors that affected performance of single livelihood components. The results indicated that some livelihoods are more irrigation-based than others and most irrigation households venture into other livelihood activities, notably, livestock production, rain-fed crop production, and selling dried fish. The study suggests that some livelihood components are water dependent while others are non-water dependent, e.g., livestock production is water dependent while selling groceries is not. Irrigation, like most water-dependent activities, is less profitable to non-water dependent households contributing only 24 % to their livelihood base than it is to water-dependent households with 62 % contribution. The study further notes that households allocate more resources to more profitable activities. Water-dependent households have more diversified income sources and relatively less nominal income than non-water dependent households who are better off by 29 %. Furthermore, irrigation reduces income inequalities among water-dependent livelihoods by 0.14 (Gini coefficient) but it has no significant effect among non-water dependent livelihoods. The results of this study argue against the common view that irrigation households have irrigation-based livelihoods. This view overshadows the water-dependency dichotomy of livelihood activities which has implications for water management. The study concludes that water management starts at the household level as households ration and that integrated water resources management can better be promoted from a livelihoods perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas AK (2004) Integrated water resources management: a reassessment. A water forum contribution. International Water Resources Association. Water Int 29–2:248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns BR, Meinzen-Dick RS (2000) Negotiating water rights. ITDG, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell BM, Luckert MK (2002) Uncovering the hidden harvest: valuation methods for woodland and forest resources. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang HS (1997) Coking coal procurement policies of the Japanese Steel Mills: changes and implications. Resour Policy 23:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies S (1996) Adaptable livelihoods: coping with food insecurity in the Malian Sahel. McMillan Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan L, Zoomers A (2005) Exploring the frontier of livelihoods research. Dev Change 36:27–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DFID (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: what contribution can we make? Russel Press Ltd, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F (2000) Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F, Freeman HA (2004) Rural livelihoods and poverty reduction strategies in four African countries. J Dev Stud 40:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F, Mdoe N (2003) Livelihoods and rural poverty reduction in Tanzania. World Dev 31:1367–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser K, Øygard R, Chibwana C, Blackie M (2005) Opportunities for Norwegian support to agricultural development in Malawi. Noragric report no. 27. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Guijt I, Thompson J (1994) Landscapes and livelihoods: environmental and socio-economic dimensions of small-scale irrigation. Land Use Policy 11:294–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GWP (2000) TEC background papers No. 4: integrated water resources management. Global Water Partnership, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • GWP (2003) Poverty reduction and IWRM. Final version. GWP Technical Committee Background Paper 8, prepared for the Water and Poverty Initiative. GWP, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • GWP (2004) Catalyzing change: a handbook for developing integrated water resources management (IWRM) and water efficiency strategies. Global Water Partnership, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamanga P (2005) Forest environmental incomes and rural livelihoods in Chiradzulu district, Malawi. Dissertation, Noragric Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay M (2001) Smallholder irrigation technology: prospects for sub-Saharan Africa. Knowledge synthesis paper no. 3, International Programme for Technology and Research in Irrigation and Drainage (IPTRID), Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd CHR (1983) A water resources evaluation of Lake Malawi and the Shire River. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankford B (2003) Irrigation-based livelihood trends in river basins: theory and policy implications for irrigation development. Phys Chem Earth 28:817–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lwesya HAL (2004) Impact of treadle pump adoption on food security; Kasungu District, Malawi. Dissertation, Centre for International Environment and Development Studies. University of Life Sciences (UMB), Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Malawi Government (1999) Review of Malawi agricultural policies and strategies. Malawi agricultural sector investment programme. Malawi Government, Lilongwe

    Google Scholar 

  • Malawi Government (2002) National irrigation policy and development strategy. Malawi Government, Lilongwe

    Google Scholar 

  • Malawi Government (2004a) National water policy. Malawi Government, Lilongwe

    Google Scholar 

  • Malawi Government (2004b) Nkhotakota socio-economic profile. Nkhotakota, Malawi

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckay J, Keremane G (2006) Farmers’ perception on self created water rules in a pioneer scheme: the Mula irrigation scheme, India. Irrig Drain Syst 20:205–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinzen-Dick R, Bakker M (2001) Water rights and multiple water uses: framework and application to Kirindi Oya irrigation scheme, Sri Lanka. Irrig Drain Syst 15:129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrey DJ, Drechsel P, Penning ve Vries FWT, Sally H (2005) Integrating “livelihoods” into integrated water resources management: taking the integration paradigm to its logical next step for developing countries. Reg Environ Change 5:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulwafu WO (2000) Conflicts over water use in Malawi: a socio-economic study of water resources management along the Likangala River in Zomba District. In: 1st WARF/WaterNet symposium: sustainable use of water resources, Maputo

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulwafu WO, Msosa HK (2005) IWRM and poverty reduction in Malawi: a socio-economic analysis. Phys Chem Earth 30:961–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulwafu W, Chipeta C, Chavula G, Ferguson A, Nkhoma BG, Chilima G (2003) Water demand management in Malawi: problems and prospects for its promotion. Phys Chem Earth 28:787–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkhotakota District Assembly (2005) District state of environment report. Nkhotakota District Assembly, Malawi Government, Lilongwe

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholt C, Anderson MB, Cloud K, Austin JE (1985) Gender roles in development projects: a case book. Kumarian Press Inc., Bloomfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis IDS Working Paper 72. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Smout IK, Gorantiwar SD (2005) Performance assessment of irrigation water management of heterogeneous irrigation schemes: 2. A case study. Irrig Drain Syst 19:37–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokile CS, Kashaigili JJ, Kadigi RMJ (2003) Towards an integrated water resource management in Tanzania: the role of appropriate institutional framework in Rufiji Basin. Phys Chem Earth 28:1015–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedeld P (2005) Protected areas, biodiversity management and the stakeholder analysis approach. Department of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric), University of Life Sciences (UMB), Aas

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedeld P, Angelsen A, Sjaastad E, Berge GK (2004) Counting on environment: forest incomes and rural poor. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tawina Jane Kopa-Kamanga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kopa-Kamanga, T.J., Kjosavik, D.J., Kamanga, P.S. (2014). Livelihoods Heterogeneity and Water Management in Malawi: Policy Implications for Irrigation Development. In: Vanlauwe, B., van Asten, P., Blomme, G. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities for Agricultural Intensification of the Humid Highland Systems of Sub-Saharan Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07662-1_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics