Abstract
A distinction will first be made between the terms ‘amateur’ and ‘professional’ astronomer in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. William Herschel, who began his career as a musician but became a salaried employee of the British Crown, clashed metaphorical swords for many years with Germany’s greatest amateur astronomer, Johann Schroeter. Each possessed the largest telescope in England and Germany, respectively. Schroeter began in the 1780s by purchasing telescopes made by Herschel, but his larger instruments were eventually made in Germany. Herschel began using his 20-foot telescope in 1783, but it would be another decade before Schroeter had a comparable instrument.
After briefly reviewing their correspondence from 1783 to 1804, their disagreements will be surveyed. These include very different measures of the diameter of Mars, and Herschel’s critique of Schroeter’s lunar, Venusian and Saturnian work. Their very different world views, as revealed by their telescopes, was the subject of a book by August Gelpke. Nowhere were these world views in starker juxtaposition than in their observations of and conclusions about Ceres and Pallas. They measured diameters in the same way, but came up with very different results. Schroeter also made a claim for a vast atmosphere around the objects, that caused variations in their light. These dual issues caused controversy and consternation among the entire astronomical community, and critiques from Carl Gauss, Wilhelm Olbers and Giuseppe Piazzi are noted. Schroeter’s rejoinder to the diameter measurement debate is also given. Finally, Herschel and Schroeter clashed about the very nature of Ceres and Pallas. The former named them ‘asteroids,’ but Schroeter explicitly stated that they were planets, not asteroids.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
(1796). The Critical Review, or Annals of Literature, 17, 128–129.
Baum, R. (1991). The Lilienthal tragedy. Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 101, 369–370.
Baum, R. (2007). Chapter 5: The Himalayas of Venus. In The haunted observatory (pp. 129–194). New York: Prometheus Books.
Baum, R. (2010). J.J. Schroeter and the atmosphere of Venus. In Yearbook of astronomy 2011 (pp. 196–204). London: Macmillan.
Cameron, G. L. (2012). Perfecting ‘A sharper image’: Telescope-making and the dissemination of technical knowledge, 1700–1820. Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 15, 125–135.
Cooke, T. (1896). On the adjustment and testing of telescopic objectives (2nd ed.). York: DeLittle & Sons.
Crowe, M. (1986). The extraterrestrial life debate, 1750–1900: The idea of a plurality of worlds from Kant to Lowell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cunningham, C. J. (1984). William Herschel and the first two asteroids. Minor Planet Bulletin, 11, 3.
Cunningham, C. J. (2001). The first asteroid: Ceres 1801–2001 (Historical studies in asteroid research, Vol. 1). Surfside: Star Lab Press.
Cunningham, C. J. (2006). Jousting for celestial glory: The discovery and study of Ceres and Pallas (Historical studies in asteroid research, Vol. 2). Surfside: Star Lab Press.
Cunningham, C. J. (2007). Johann Hieronymous Schroeter. In T. Hockey et al. (Eds.), The biographical encyclopedia of astronomers (pp. 1030–1031). New York: Springer.
Cunningham, C. J., Marsden, B. G., & Orchiston, W. (2009). How the first dwarf planet became the asteroid Ceres. Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 12, 240–248.
Denning, W. F. (1904). Schroeter and the burning of Lilienthal in 1813. The Observatory, 27, 312–313.
Dobbins, T., & Sheehan, W. (1997). Johann Schroeter’s ‘extremely dark spots of Jupiter’. Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 107, 144–146.
Forbush, W. B. (1980). Johann Schroeter on the light of the nebulae. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 11, 111–113.
Gargano, M. (2012). The development of astronomy in Naples: The tale of two large telescopes made by William Herschel. Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 15, 31–42.
Gelpke, A. (1801). General observations on the world and the latest discoveries made by Dr. Herschel and Counsellor of Justice Schroeter. Königslutter: Friedrich Culemann. 2nd ed. (1806) published in Hannover (in German).
Gelpke, A. (1835). On the terrible effects of a cometary impact on the Earth. Leipzig: Friedrich Fleischer (in German).
Gerdes, D. (1986). Das Leben und das Werk des Astronomen Dr. Johann Hieronymus Schroeter, geboren am 30. August 1745 zu Erfurt. Lilienthal: Gerdes (in German).
Goodacre, W. (1917). Schroeter’s lunar drawings. Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 27, 167–169.
Herschel, W. (1780). Astronomical observations relating to the mountains of the Moon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 70, 507–526.
Herschel, W. (1784). On the remarkable appearances at the polar regions of the planet Mars, the inclination of its axis, the position of its poles, and its spheroidical figure; with a few hints relating to its real diameter and atmosphere. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 74, 233–273.
Herschel, W. (1793). Observations of the planet Venus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 83, 201–219.
Herschel, W. (1802). Observations on the two lately discovered celestial bodies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 92, 213–232.
Herschel, W. (1807). Observations on the nature of the new celestial body discovered by Dr. Olbers, and of the comet which was expected to appear last January in its return from the Sun. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 97, 260–266.
Hilton, J. (2002). Asteroid masses and densities. In W. Bottke, A. Cellino, P. Paolicchi, & R. P. Binzel (Eds.), Asteroids III (pp. 103–112). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Hughes, D. (1994). The historical unravelling of the diameters of the first four asteroids. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 35, 331–344.
John, K. (2004). August Heinrich Christian Gelpke—ein Astronom am Collegium Carolinum zu Braunschweig. Doctoral dissertation, Technischen Universität Carolo Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig.
Leue, H.-J. (2002). Johann Gottlieb Schrader and the construction of telescopes in Lilienthal. Acta Historica Astronomiae, 14, 37–50.
Lynn, W. T. (1892). Herschel and Schroeter. The Observatory, 15, 345–346.
Mill, J. S. (1843). A system of logic ratiocinative and inductive. London: John Parker.
Nasmyth, J., & Carpenter, J. (1874). The moon: Considered as a planet, a world, and a satellite (2nd ed.). London: John Murray.
Neison, E. (1876). On the position of Schroeter with regard to selenography of the present time. Astronomical Register, 14, 199–203.
Oestmann, G. (2002). Astronomischer Dilettant oder verkanntes Genie? Zum Bild Johann Hieronymus Schroeters in der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. In W. R. Dick (Ed.), Astronomie von Olbers bis Schwarzschild (Acta Historica Astronomiae, Vol. 14, pp. 9–24). Frankfurt am Main: Harri Deutsch.
Oestmann, G., & Reich, K. (2001). Olbers und Gauss: Leben und Werk im Spiegel ihrer Korrespondenz 1802–1839. In G. Biegel, G. Oestman, & R. Karin (Eds.), Neue Welten: Wilhelm Olbers und die Naturwissenschaften um 1800 (Disquisitiones Historiae Scientiarum: Braunschweiger Beiträge zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Vol. 1, pp. 22–26). Braunschweig: Braunschweigisches Landesmuseum.
Piazzi, G. (1802). On the discovery of the new planet Ceres Ferdinandea, eighth among the primaries of our solar system. Palermo: Palermo Observatory (in Italian).
Schroeter, J. (1788). Beitrage zu den neuesten astronomischen Entdeckungen. Berlin: A.G. Lange.
Schroeter, J. (1791). Selenotopographische Fragmente sur Genauern Kenntniss der Mondflache. Lilienthal. Part II was completed in 1797, and a two-volume edition of the complete work was published in Goettingen in 1802.
Schroeter, J. (1792). Observations on the atmospheres of Venus and the Moon, their respective densities, perpendicular heights, and the twilight occasioned by them. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 82, 309–361.
Schroeter, J. (1795). New observations in further proof of mountainous inequalities, rotation, atmosphere, and twilight of the planet Venus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 85, 117–176.
Schroeter, J. (1796). Aphroditographische Fragmente, zur genauern Kenntifs des Planeten Venus. Helmstedt: Lilienthal.
Schroeter, J. (1805). Lilienthalische Beobachtungen der neu-entdeckten Planeten Ceres, Pallas und Juno. (Observations made at Lilienthal on the newly discovered Planets, Ceres, Pallas and Juno.) Goettingen, Wandenhoeck and Ruprecht. English translation of this book appears in Cunningham (2001) pp. 201–223, and Cunningham (2006) pp. 268–285.
See, T. J. J. (1900). Researches on the diameter of Venus. Astronomische Nachrichten, 154, 81–88.
See, T. J. J. (1901). Preliminary investigation of the diameter of Mars. Astronomische Nachrichten, 157, 97–114.
Sheehan, W., & Baum, R. (1995). Observation and inference: Johann Hieronymous Schroeter, 1745–1816. Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 105, 171–175.
Spaight, J. T. (2004). “For the good of astronomy”: The manufacture, sale, and distant use of William Herschel’s telescopes. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 35, 45–69.
van de Sande Bakhuyzen, H. G. (1881). Aerographische Beiträge zur genauren kenntniss und beurtheilung des Planeten Mars, in mathematisch-physischer hinsicht. Leiden: Brill.
Verne, J. (1865). From the Earth to the Moon. Paris: Pierre-Jules Hetzel (in French).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cunningham, C.J., Orchiston, W. (2015). The Clash Between William Herschel and the Great German ‘Amateur’ Astronomer Johann Schroeter. In: Orchiston, W., Green, D., Strom, R. (eds) New Insights From Recent Studies in Historical Astronomy: Following in the Footsteps of F. Richard Stephenson. Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07614-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07614-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07613-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07614-0
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)