Skip to main content

The Clash Between William Herschel and the Great German ‘Amateur’ Astronomer Johann Schroeter

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Insights From Recent Studies in Historical Astronomy: Following in the Footsteps of F. Richard Stephenson

Part of the book series: Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings ((ASSSP,volume 43))

Abstract

A distinction will first be made between the terms ‘amateur’ and ‘professional’ astronomer in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. William Herschel, who began his career as a musician but became a salaried employee of the British Crown, clashed metaphorical swords for many years with Germany’s greatest amateur astronomer, Johann Schroeter. Each possessed the largest telescope in England and Germany, respectively. Schroeter began in the 1780s by purchasing telescopes made by Herschel, but his larger instruments were eventually made in Germany. Herschel began using his 20-foot telescope in 1783, but it would be another decade before Schroeter had a comparable instrument.

After briefly reviewing their correspondence from 1783 to 1804, their disagreements will be surveyed. These include very different measures of the diameter of Mars, and Herschel’s critique of Schroeter’s lunar, Venusian and Saturnian work. Their very different world views, as revealed by their telescopes, was the subject of a book by August Gelpke. Nowhere were these world views in starker juxtaposition than in their observations of and conclusions about Ceres and Pallas. They measured diameters in the same way, but came up with very different results. Schroeter also made a claim for a vast atmosphere around the objects, that caused variations in their light. These dual issues caused controversy and consternation among the entire astronomical community, and critiques from Carl Gauss, Wilhelm Olbers and Giuseppe Piazzi are noted. Schroeter’s rejoinder to the diameter measurement debate is also given. Finally, Herschel and Schroeter clashed about the very nature of Ceres and Pallas. The former named them ‘asteroids,’ but Schroeter explicitly stated that they were planets, not asteroids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • (1796). The Critical Review, or Annals of Literature, 17, 128–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, R. (1991). The Lilienthal tragedy. Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 101, 369–370.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, R. (2007). Chapter 5: The Himalayas of Venus. In The haunted observatory (pp. 129–194). New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, R. (2010). J.J. Schroeter and the atmosphere of Venus. In Yearbook of astronomy 2011 (pp. 196–204). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, G. L. (2012). Perfecting ‘A sharper image’: Telescope-making and the dissemination of technical knowledge, 1700–1820. Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 15, 125–135.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, T. (1896). On the adjustment and testing of telescopic objectives (2nd ed.). York: DeLittle & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, M. (1986). The extraterrestrial life debate, 1750–1900: The idea of a plurality of worlds from Kant to Lowell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. J. (1984). William Herschel and the first two asteroids. Minor Planet Bulletin, 11, 3.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. J. (2001). The first asteroid: Ceres 1801–2001 (Historical studies in asteroid research, Vol. 1). Surfside: Star Lab Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. J. (2006). Jousting for celestial glory: The discovery and study of Ceres and Pallas (Historical studies in asteroid research, Vol. 2). Surfside: Star Lab Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. J. (2007). Johann Hieronymous Schroeter. In T. Hockey et al. (Eds.), The biographical encyclopedia of astronomers (pp. 1030–1031). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. J., Marsden, B. G., & Orchiston, W. (2009). How the first dwarf planet became the asteroid Ceres. Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 12, 240–248.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Denning, W. F. (1904). Schroeter and the burning of Lilienthal in 1813. The Observatory, 27, 312–313.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, T., & Sheehan, W. (1997). Johann Schroeter’s ‘extremely dark spots of Jupiter’. Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 107, 144–146.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Forbush, W. B. (1980). Johann Schroeter on the light of the nebulae. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 11, 111–113.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gargano, M. (2012). The development of astronomy in Naples: The tale of two large telescopes made by William Herschel. Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 15, 31–42.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelpke, A. (1801). General observations on the world and the latest discoveries made by Dr. Herschel and Counsellor of Justice Schroeter. Königslutter: Friedrich Culemann. 2nd ed. (1806) published in Hannover (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelpke, A. (1835). On the terrible effects of a cometary impact on the Earth. Leipzig: Friedrich Fleischer (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes, D. (1986). Das Leben und das Werk des Astronomen Dr. Johann Hieronymus Schroeter, geboren am 30. August 1745 zu Erfurt. Lilienthal: Gerdes (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodacre, W. (1917). Schroeter’s lunar drawings. Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 27, 167–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, W. (1780). Astronomical observations relating to the mountains of the Moon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 70, 507–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, W. (1784). On the remarkable appearances at the polar regions of the planet Mars, the inclination of its axis, the position of its poles, and its spheroidical figure; with a few hints relating to its real diameter and atmosphere. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 74, 233–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, W. (1793). Observations of the planet Venus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 83, 201–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, W. (1802). Observations on the two lately discovered celestial bodies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 92, 213–232.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, W. (1807). Observations on the nature of the new celestial body discovered by Dr. Olbers, and of the comet which was expected to appear last January in its return from the Sun. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 97, 260–266.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, J. (2002). Asteroid masses and densities. In W. Bottke, A. Cellino, P. Paolicchi, & R. P. Binzel (Eds.), Asteroids III (pp. 103–112). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D. (1994). The historical unravelling of the diameters of the first four asteroids. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 35, 331–344.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • John, K. (2004). August Heinrich Christian Gelpke—ein Astronom am Collegium Carolinum zu Braunschweig. Doctoral dissertation, Technischen Universität Carolo Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leue, H.-J. (2002). Johann Gottlieb Schrader and the construction of telescopes in Lilienthal. Acta Historica Astronomiae, 14, 37–50.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, W. T. (1892). Herschel and Schroeter. The Observatory, 15, 345–346.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1843). A system of logic ratiocinative and inductive. London: John Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasmyth, J., & Carpenter, J. (1874). The moon: Considered as a planet, a world, and a satellite (2nd ed.). London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neison, E. (1876). On the position of Schroeter with regard to selenography of the present time. Astronomical Register, 14, 199–203.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Oestmann, G. (2002). Astronomischer Dilettant oder verkanntes Genie? Zum Bild Johann Hieronymus Schroeters in der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. In W. R. Dick (Ed.), Astronomie von Olbers bis Schwarzschild (Acta Historica Astronomiae, Vol. 14, pp. 9–24). Frankfurt am Main: Harri Deutsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oestmann, G., & Reich, K. (2001). Olbers und Gauss: Leben und Werk im Spiegel ihrer Korrespondenz 1802–1839. In G. Biegel, G. Oestman, & R. Karin (Eds.), Neue Welten: Wilhelm Olbers und die Naturwissenschaften um 1800 (Disquisitiones Historiae Scientiarum: Braunschweiger Beiträge zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Vol. 1, pp. 22–26). Braunschweig: Braunschweigisches Landesmuseum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazzi, G. (1802). On the discovery of the new planet Ceres Ferdinandea, eighth among the primaries of our solar system. Palermo: Palermo Observatory (in Italian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeter, J. (1788). Beitrage zu den neuesten astronomischen Entdeckungen. Berlin: A.G. Lange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeter, J. (1791). Selenotopographische Fragmente sur Genauern Kenntniss der Mondflache. Lilienthal. Part II was completed in 1797, and a two-volume edition of the complete work was published in Goettingen in 1802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeter, J. (1792). Observations on the atmospheres of Venus and the Moon, their respective densities, perpendicular heights, and the twilight occasioned by them. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 82, 309–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeter, J. (1795). New observations in further proof of mountainous inequalities, rotation, atmosphere, and twilight of the planet Venus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 85, 117–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeter, J. (1796). Aphroditographische Fragmente, zur genauern Kenntifs des Planeten Venus. Helmstedt: Lilienthal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeter, J. (1805). Lilienthalische Beobachtungen der neu-entdeckten Planeten Ceres, Pallas und Juno. (Observations made at Lilienthal on the newly discovered Planets, Ceres, Pallas and Juno.) Goettingen, Wandenhoeck and Ruprecht. English translation of this book appears in Cunningham (2001) pp. 201–223, and Cunningham (2006) pp. 268–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • See, T. J. J. (1900). Researches on the diameter of Venus. Astronomische Nachrichten, 154, 81–88.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • See, T. J. J. (1901). Preliminary investigation of the diameter of Mars. Astronomische Nachrichten, 157, 97–114.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, W., & Baum, R. (1995). Observation and inference: Johann Hieronymous Schroeter, 1745–1816. Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 105, 171–175.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Spaight, J. T. (2004). “For the good of astronomy”: The manufacture, sale, and distant use of William Herschel’s telescopes. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 35, 45–69.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • van de Sande Bakhuyzen, H. G. (1881). Aerographische Beiträge zur genauren kenntniss und beurtheilung des Planeten Mars, in mathematisch-physischer hinsicht. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verne, J. (1865). From the Earth to the Moon. Paris: Pierre-Jules Hetzel (in French).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clifford J. Cunningham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cunningham, C.J., Orchiston, W. (2015). The Clash Between William Herschel and the Great German ‘Amateur’ Astronomer Johann Schroeter. In: Orchiston, W., Green, D., Strom, R. (eds) New Insights From Recent Studies in Historical Astronomy: Following in the Footsteps of F. Richard Stephenson. Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07614-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics