Skip to main content

Refining the Isard Multiregional Input–Output Model: Theory, Operationality and Extensions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regional Science Matters

Abstract

Isard demonstrated as early as 1951 that traditional (national) I–O models are inadequate because they cannot capture the effects of linkages and interactions among regions. To examine the full (short-term) impacts of unexpected events, such as terrorist attacks or natural disasters on the U.S. economy, the economic links among states (e.g. interregional trade, based on detailed shipments data) had also be analyzed. IMPLAN provided State input–output data. Few MRIO models have been implemented (since Polenske’s attempt in 1980), but the potential increased after 1993 when the Commodity Flow Surveys (CFS) were introduced. This chapter introduces our model, the National Interstate Economic Model (NIEMO) which is an attempt to operationalize Isard’s ideas fully, and covers 52 regions (the 50 States, Washington DC, and the “rest of the world”) and 47 (29 commodity and 18 service) sectors. This was made possible by the expansion of the data base and the dramatic improvement in computer capacity. Much of the chapter explains how the model was built. A key step was the creation of conversion tables to make IMPLAN and CFS data compatible, and two sets of coefficients (industrial trade and regional interindustry). Model extensions were also introduced, TransNIEMO (to integrate the national highway network), FlexNIEMO (to relax the standard I–O assumption of fixed production coefficients), and adding induced impacts to indirect impacts in interregional trade analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This paper focuses only on the US economy. However, interregional I-O models have been developed in many parts of the world. Most of them have been built up from Isard’s (and Leontief’s) ideas. None of them have the degree of spatial and sectoral disaggregation found in NIEMO, the model discussed in this paper. Samples of the research are listed here: Akita and Kateoka (2002), Bonfiglio (2005), Hulu and Hewings (1993), Ichimura and Wong (2003), IDE-JETRO (2000, 2005), Kratena et al. (2013), Okamoto et al. (2005), Perez et al. (2008), Sargento (2009), Thijs (1983), Trinh et al. (2013), Turner et al. (2011), Zhang and Shi (2009). Most of these have been written in the last decade. The examples are from Asia and Europe: Japan, China, Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, the European Union, Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal and Romania. A large majority of the studies are empirically based and we were unable to discover a theoretical innovation that needed to be discussed in the main text of this paper.

References

  • Akita T, Kateoka M (2002) Interregional interdependence and regional economic growth: an interregional input-output analysis of the Kyushi Region (1965-90). Rev Urban Reg Develop Stud 14(1):18–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berwick M, Farooq M (2003) Truck costing model for transportation managers. Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, North Dakota State University. http://www.mountain-plains.org/pubs/html/mpc-03-152/index.php

  • Bonfiglio A (2005) The impact of EU accession in Romania. An analysis of regional development policy effects by a multiregional I-O model. European Association of Agricultural Economists, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Canning P, Wang Z (2005) A flexible mathematical programming model to estimate interregional input-output accounts. J Reg Sci 45:539–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenery HB (1953) Regional analysis. In: Chenery HB, Clark PG, Pinna VC (eds) The structure and growth of the Italian economy. U.S. Mutual Security Agency, Rome, pp 98–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho J, Gordon P, Moore II JE, Pan Q, Park JY, Richardson HW (2014) TransNIEMO: economic impact analysis using a model of consistent interregional economic and highway network Equilibria. CESifo Working Paper No. 4601

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietzenbacher E (1997) In vindication of the ghosh model: a reinterpretation as a price model. J Reg Sci 37:629–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano GG, Peter QP, Park JY, Wang LL (2010) Estimating freight flows for metropolitan area highway networks using secondary data sources. Netw Spatial Econ 10(1):73–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon P, Park JY, Richardson HW (2009) Modeling input-output impacts with substitutions in the household sector: a numerical example. Econ Model 26(3):696–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulu E, Hewings GJD (1993) The development and use of interregional input-output models for Indonesia under conditions of limited information. Rev Urban Reg Develop Stud 5:135–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichimura S, Wong H-J (2003) Interregional input-output analysis of the Chinese Economy. Scientific World, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • IDE-JETRO (2000) The transnational inter-regional input-output table between China and Japan. Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • IDE-JETRO (2005) The transnational inter-regional input-output table between China, Japan and Korea. Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard W (1951) Interregional and regional input-output analysis: a model of a space economy. Rev Econ Stat 33:318–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isard W (1960) Methods of regional science. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack Faucett Associates, Inc (1983) The multiregional input-output accounts, 1977: introduction and summary, vol I (final report). Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RW, Schwarm WR, Okuyama Y, Islam S (2006) A method for constructing commodity by industry flow matrices. Ann Reg Sci 40:909–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratena K et al (2013) FIDELIO 1: Fully Interregional Dynamic Econometric Long-term Input-Output Model for the EU2. European Commission, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee B, Park JY, Gordon P, Moore JE II, Richardson HW (2012) Estimating the state-by-state economic impacts of a foot-and-mouth disease attack. Int Reg Sci Rev 35(1):26–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu LN, Vilain P (2004) Estimating commodity inflows to a substate region: using input-output data: commodity flow survey accuracy tests. J Transport Stat 7(1):23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RE, Blair PD (1985) Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RE, Shao G (1990) Spatial and sectoral aggregation in the commodity-industry multiregional input-output model. Environ Plan A 22:1637–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses LN (1955) The stability of interregional trading patterns and input-output analysis. Am Econ Rev 45:803–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) (2000) Freight USA. Highlights from the 1997 commodity flow survey and other sources. Report prepared for the Bureau of Transportation Statistics US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC 20590

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto N, Sano T, Inomata S (2005) Estimation of International Input-Output Analysis by Non-Survey Method. IDE-JETRO

    Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Gordon P (2005) An evaluation of input–output aggregation error using a new MRIO model. Regional Science Association International 52nd Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV

    Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Gordon P, Moore II JE, Richardson HW, Wang L (2007), Simulating the state-by-state effects of terrorist attacks on three major US ports: applying NIEMO (National Interstate Economic Model). In: Richardson HW, Gordon P, Moore II JE (eds) The economic costs and consequences of terrorism. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 208–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Gordon P, Moore JE II, Richardson HW (2009) A two-step approach to estimating state-by-state commodity trade flows. Ann Reg Sci 43(4):1033–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Gordon P, Moore II JE, Richardson HW (2011b) Constructing a flexible national interstate economic model. 19th International Input-Output Conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Cho J, Gordon P, Moore JE II, Richardson HW, Yoon S (2011b) Adding a freight network to a national interstate input-output model: a TransNIEMO application for California. J Transport Geogr 19(6):1410–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Moore JE II, Richardson HW (2013) The gulf oil spill and economic impacts: extending the national interstate economic model (NIEMO) to account for induced impacts. J Homel Secur Emerg Manage 10(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez J, Dones M, Llano C (2008) An interregional impact analysis of the EU Structural Funds in Spain (1995–1999). Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Polenske KR (1980) The U.S. multiregional input-output accounts and model. DC Health, Lexington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich KM, Miller GY, Winter-Nelson A (2005a) A review of economic tools for the assessment of animal disease outbreaks. Revue Scientifique Et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties 24:833–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich KM, Winter-Nelson A, Miller GY (2005b) Enhancing economic models for the analysis of animal disease. Revue Scientifique Et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties 24:847–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson HW, Park JY, Pan Q, Moore JE II (eds) (2014) National economic impact analysis of terrorist attacks and natural disasters. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargento ALM (2009) Regional input-output tables and models. Ph D Dissertation, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi Y (1985) Urban transportation networks: equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth F (2005) Filling gaps in the US commodity flow pictures: using the CFS with other data sources. CFS Conference 2005 Workshop by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Boston, MA. http://www.ornl.gov/~webworks/cppr/y2001/pres/123616.pdf

  • Thijs TR (1983) Some interregional input-output analysis. Revue d’Economie Regionale et Urbaine, #2

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinh B, Hung DM, Huan NV (2013) Vietnam inter-regional input-output analysis: the bi-regional and 8-regional cases of Vietnam. J Contemp Manage 2(4):11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner K, Gilmartin M, McGregor PG Swales JK (2011) An integrated IO and CGE approach to analysing changes in environmental trade balances. University of Stirling Economics Discussion Paper 2011–4, Stirling, Scotland

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Transportation (USDOT) Federal Highway Administration (2002) Freight analysis framework (FAF) Overview. Washington DC, http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/index.htm

  • US Department of Transportation (USDOT), Research and innovative technology administration (RITA) and Bureau of transportation statistics (BTS) (2005) Transportation Statistics Annual Report. Washington, DC, http://www.bts.gov/publications/transportation_statistics_annual_report/2005/pdf/entire.pdf

  • Zhang Z, Shi M (2009) Spatial linkage of manufacturing industries in China: based on interregional input-output analysis. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on input-output techniques. http://www.iioa.org/conferences/17th/papers.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiyoung Park .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Park, J., Richardson, H.W. (2015). Refining the Isard Multiregional Input–Output Model: Theory, Operationality and Extensions. In: Nijkamp, P., Rose, A., Kourtit, K. (eds) Regional Science Matters. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07305-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics