Skip to main content

Barriers of the Supply Chain Integration Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Logistics Operations, Supply Chain Management and Sustainability

Part of the book series: EcoProduction ((ECOPROD))

Abstract

Complex systems of supply chains need to be integrated. Such integration is essential in order to achieve sustainable logistics of the system. This chapter presents an approach to this issue based on DEMATEL methodology. This chapter presents an approach to this issue based on identifying the barriers in supply chain integration and understanding their cause effect relationships using the DEcision MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) methodology. A total of 17 barriers affecting the integration of business entities in the supply chain were identified through a survey addressed to experts from Poland and Canada. The results of the study show Lack of Resource sharing (integration), Lack of Organisational compatibility, Lack of Information sharing, Lack of Responsibility sharing, and Lack of Planning of supply chain activities as top five barriers in supply chain integration. Therefore, organizations should investigate causes behind these barriers and take appropriate measures to resolve them to ensure seamless integration across their supply chains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Awasthi A, Grzybowska K, Chauhan SS, Goyal SK (2014) Investigating Organizational Characteristics for Sustainable Supply Chain Planning Under Fuzziness. In: Kahraman C, ÖztayÅŸi B (eds), Supply Chain Management Under Fuzziness, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 313. Springer, Berlin, pp 81–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai C, Joseph S, Wei X, Koh L (2012) Evaluating ecological sustainable performance measures for supply chain management. Supply Chain Management Int J 17(1):78–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown D, Wilson S (2005) The black book of outsourcing hoboken. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M (1998) Logistics and supply chain management. Financial Times/Pitman Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: win–win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manag Rev 36(2):90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontela E, Gabus A (1976) The DEMATEL observer, DEMATEL 1976 Report. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabus A, Fontela E (1972) World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabus A, Fontela E (1973) Perceptions of the world problematique: communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility (DEMATEL Report no. 1). Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganeshan R, Harrison TP (1995) Am introduction to supply chain management, department of management sciences and information systems, 303 beam business building. Penn State University, University Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzybowska K (2010a) Constitutive elements of the supply chain, operations and logistics management, E PawÅ‚owski (red.). Publishing House of Poznan University of Technology. p 77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzybowska K (2010b) Spójny Å‚aÅ„cuch dostaw—sposób na wzrost efektywnoÅ›ci metastruktur i przetrwanie w okresie kryzysu, Zmiana warunkiem sukcesu. Odnowa przedsiÄ™biorstwa—czego nauczyÅ‚ nas kryzys?, Prace naukowe UE nr 128, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we WrocÅ‚awius. 319–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Hori S, Shimizu Y (1999) Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems. Control Eng Pract 7(11):1413–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CY, Shyu JZ, Tzeng GH (2007) Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan’s SIP Mall industry. Technovation 27(12):744–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert BM, Stock JR, Ellram LM (1998) Fundamentals of logistics management. Irwin/MacGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL, Billington C (1995) The evolution of supply-chain-management models and practice at Hewlett-Packard. Interfaces 25(5):42–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CJ, Wu WW (2008) A causal analytical method for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 34(1):205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CL, Tzeng GH (2009) A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL. Expert Syst Appl 36:9683–9697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou JH, Tzeng GH, Chang HC (2007) Airline safety measurement using a novel hybrid model. J Air Transp Manage 13(4):243–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou JJH, Yen L, Tzeng GH (2008) Building an effective safety management system for airlines. J Air Transp Manage 14(1):20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer JT, DeWitt W, Keebler JK, Min S, Nix NW, Smith CD, Zacharia ZG (2001) Defining supply chain management. J Bus Logistics 22(2):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring S (2013) A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decis Support Syst 54(4):1513–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring S, Müller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 16(15):1699–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyed Hosseini SM, Safaei N, Asgharpour MJ (2006) Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(8):872–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai WH, Chou WC (2009) Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):1444–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng GH, Chiang CH, Li CW (2007) Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst Appl 32(4):1028–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu WW (2008) Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Syst Appl 35(3):828–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu WW, Lee YT (2007) Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Syst Appl 32(2):499–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zandin KB, Maynard HB (2001) Maynard’s industrial engineering handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjali Awasthi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Awasthi, A., Grzybowska, K. (2014). Barriers of the Supply Chain Integration Process. In: Golinska, P. (eds) Logistics Operations, Supply Chain Management and Sustainability. EcoProduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07287-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics