Skip to main content

Automatic Tuning of PID Regulators for Type-I Control Loops

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
PID Controller Tuning Using the Magnitude Optimum Criterion

Abstract

A systematic automatic tuning method for PID-type controllers in Single Input–Single Output processes is proposed. The method is inspired from the Magnitude Optimum design criterion and (1) considers the existence of a poor process model and (2) requires only access to the output of the process and not to its states (3) requires an open-loop experiment on the plant itself for initializing the algorithm. The application of the Magnitude Optimum criterion for tuning the PID controller in the case of a known single input–single output linear process model and regardless of its complexity shows that the step response of the control loop exhibits a certain performance in terms of overshoot (4.4 %), settling and rise time as it was already shown in Chap. 3 and Sect. 3.2. The proposed method exploits this feature and tunes the PID controller parameters, so that the aforementioned performance is achieved. Since the proposed control law is not restricted to specific plants regarding their complexity, a performance comparison in Sects. 7.3 and 7.4.3 discusses the closed-loop frequency response when the controller is tuned optimally according to Sect. 3.3 and when the controller is tuned automatically according to Sect. 7.2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Stator or rotor field oriented vector control.

  2. 2.

    Overshoot, settling and rise time remain unaltered.

  3. 3.

    The controller’s unmodeled dynamics \({T_{{\Sigma _{\text {c}}}}}\) are negligible compared to the plant’s unmodeled dynamics \({T_{{\Sigma _{\text {p}}}}}\), \({T_{{\Sigma _{\text {c}}}}}\ll {T_{{\Sigma _{\text {p}}}}}\).

  4. 4.

    In this case, only an open-loop experiment is required to the process for initializing the algorithm and no other information.

  5. 5.

    In this case, the transfer function is assumed accurately modeled.

  6. 6.

    \(T_x\) is a design parameter.

  7. 7.

    This time constant was chosen sufficiently large, so that \(\tau \rightarrow 0\).

  8. 8.

    The amplitude of these pulses is small enough, so that the output of the control loop \(y(t)\) does not diverge far from its operating point.

  9. 9.

    The PI controller can be avoided and a simple bang-bang control with a hysteresis band in the output overshoot reference can be introduced.

References

  1. Ang KH, Chong G, Li Y (2005) PID control system analysis, design, and technology. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 13(4):559–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Åströ KJ, Hägglund T (1995) PID controllers: theory, design and tuning, 2nd edn. Instrument Society of America, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  3. Åström KJ, Wittenmark B (1973) On self tuning regulators. Automatica 9(2):185–199

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Åström KJ, Hägglund T, Hang CC, Ho WK (1993) Automatic tuning and adaptation for PID controllers—a survey. Control Eng Pract 1(4):699–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakhshai AR, Joos G, Jain PK, Hua J (2000) Incorporating the overmodulation range in space vector pattern generators using a classification algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Electron 15(1):83–94

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bi Q, Cai WJ, Wang QC, Hang CC, Lee EL, Sun Y, Liu KD, Zhang Y, Zou B (2000) Advanced controller auto-tuning and its application in HVAC systems. Control Eng Pract 8(6):633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cameron F, Seborg DE (1982) A self tuning controller with a PID structure. Int J Control 38(2):401–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan FY, Moallem M, Wang W (2007) Design and implementation of modular FPGA-based PID controllers. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 54(4):1898–1906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen CL (1989) A simple method for on-line identification and controller tuning. AIChE J 35(12):2037–2039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cox CS, Daniel PR, Lowdon A (1997) Quicktune: a reliable automatic strategy for determining PI and PPI controller parameters using FOPDT model. Control Eng Pract 5(10):1463–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dannehl J, Fuchs FW, Hansen S, Thogersen PB (2009) Investigation of active damping approaches for PI-based current control of grid-connected pulse width modulation converters with LCL filters. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 46(4):1509–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dannehl J, Liserre M, Fuchs FW (2011) Filter-based active damping of voltage source converters with LCL filter. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(8):3623–3633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Friman M (1997) Automatic retuning of PI controllers in oscillating control loops. Ind Eng Chem Res 36(10):4255–4263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fröhr F, Orttenburger F (1982) Introduction to electronic control engineering. Siemens, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ho WK, Hang CC, Zhou J (1997) Self-tuning PID control of a plant with under-damped response with specifications on gain and phase margins. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 5(4):446–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kerkman DRJ, Leggate Seibel BJ (1996) Operation of PWM voltage source-inverters in the overmodulation region. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 43(1):132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee DC, Lee GM (1998) A novel overmodulation technique for space-vector PWM inverters. IEEE Trans Power Electron 13(6):1144–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu F, Wu B, Zargari NR, Pande M (2011) An active damping method using inductor-current feedback control for high-power PWM current-source rectifier. IEEE Trans Power Electron 26(9):2580–2587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O’ Dwyer A (2003) Handbook of PI and PID controller tuning rules, 1st edn. Imperial College Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Oldenbourg RC, Sartorius H (1954) A uniform approach to the optimum adjustment of control loops. Trans ASME 76:1265–1279

    Google Scholar 

  21. Papadopoulos KG, Margaris NI (2012) Extending the symmetrical optimum criterion to the design of PID type-p control loops. J Process Control 12(1):11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Papadopoulos KG, Margaris NI (2013) Optimal automatic tuning of active damping PID regulators. J Process Control 23(6):905–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Papadopoulos KG, Tselepis ND, Margaris NI (2012a) On the automatic tuning of PID type controllers via the magnitude optimum criterion. In: International conference on industrial technology (ICIT), IEEE, Athens, Greece, pp 869–874

    Google Scholar 

  24. Papadopoulos KG, Tselepis ND, Margaris NI (2012b) Revisiting the magnitude optimum criterion for robust tuning of PID type-I control loops. J Process Control 22(6):1063–1078

    Google Scholar 

  25. Papadopoulos KG, Papastefanaki EN, Margaris NI (2013) Explicit analytical PID tuning rules for the design of type-III control loops. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 60(10):4650–4664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rahimi AR, Syberg BM, Emadi A (2009) Active damping in DC/DC power electronic converters: a novel method to overcome the problems of constant power loads. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 56(5):1428–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Saeedifard M, Bakhshai A (2007) Neuro-computing vector classification SVM schemes to integrate the overmodulation region in neutral point clamped (NPC) converters. IEEE Trans Power Electron 22(3):995–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Umland WJ, Safiuddin M (1990) Magnitude and symmetric optimum criterion for the design of linear control systems: what is it and how does it compare with the others? IEEE Trans Ind Appl 26(3):489–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos G. Papadopoulos .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Papadopoulos, K.G. (2015). Automatic Tuning of PID Regulators for Type-I Control Loops. In: PID Controller Tuning Using the Magnitude Optimum Criterion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07263-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07263-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07262-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07263-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics