Abstract
A quarter of a century has now passed since Gro Harlem Brundtland produced her landmark report on sustainable development, yet little progress has been made towards achieving the kinds of policy reform that might result in sustainable development being realised – especially in the humanistic rather than technocratic manner that she advocated.
The Brundtland Report suggested the only political strategy imaginable given the nature of the international system at the time: the pursuit of sustainability was essentially a matter to be decided by sovereign national governments (World Commission on Environment and Development, Our common future. UN, New York, 1987). Since its problems transcended all national borders, their resolution required intergovernmental agreements that were global in scope and the United Nations offered the only framework for conducting such negotiations. Once member governments had signed the relevant treaties, they would ratify and faithfully execute them – with supplementary assistance from new and/or pre-existing UN specialized agencies. None of these assumptions was completely wrong, but we now know, after two decades of highly visible global conferences, multiple international declarations of good intention, and several intergovernmental treaties, that they collectively turned out to be insufficient. The world is not more sustainable than it was – quite the contrary – and it is hard to discern whether all of these efforts have made any appreciable positive difference. Brundtland was innovative in its analysis of problems, but conventional in its political strategy for solving them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
If it is any comfort, Sachs at least makes an effort at dealing with the agency problem. The much publicized, Growth Report. Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development (Center for Global Development 2008) makes none at all – despite its sub-title. The Report is utterly technocratic and seems to presume that, if politicians just accept the expert advice it contains, the politics involved in its implementation will take care of the rest. Moreover, the economic wisdom it proffers is amazingly ‘pusillanimous.’ Consider just the two following conclusions: ‘Our model of developing economies is too primitive at this stage to make it wise to pre-define what governments should do’ (Center for Global Development 2008: 30); ‘Nonetheless, the commissioners have a keen sense of the policies that probably matter’ (ibid.: 33, my emphasis). The reader will be pleased to learn that ‘An international economy in a world of nation-states has no natural guardians. That is perhaps the biggest risk of all’ (ibid.: 103 – again my emphasis).
- 2.
The political thinker who was most obsessed with the problem of the uncertainty of the future was Thomas Hobbes. Human beings, he observed, were the only animals capable of imagining different futures and acting rationally in anticipation in order to alter them. One does not have to accept his solution, devolution of absolute authority to a single sovereign, to appreciate the relevance of his thought.
- 3.
In addition to the usual reference to ‘advocacy groups’ and ‘new social movements,’ I would stress the role of interest associations and private foundations. The civil society literature focuses much too much on such ‘single issue groups,’ at the expense of more permanent organizations representing class, sectoral and professional interests. The latter have a great deal to contribute to raising consciousness and reaching agreements with regard to matters of sustainability. And foundations have very often been at the origin of support for a wide range of CSOs.
References
Center for Global Development. (2008). Growth report. Strategies for sustained growth and inclusive development. Washington, DC: IBRD.
Marshall, T. H. (1964). Class, citizenship and social development. Garden City: Doubleday & Company.
Olson, M. (2000). Power and prosperity: Outgrowing communist and capitalist dictatorships. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sachs, J. D. (2008). Common wealth: Economics for a crowded planet. New York: The Penguin Press.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. New York: UN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmitter, P.C. (2014). The Politics of Sustainability: Some Principles and Proposals. In: Lang, A., Murphy, H. (eds) Business and Sustainability. Sustainability and Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07239-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07239-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07238-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07239-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)