Skip to main content

Japan’s Economic Growth and the Role of Government

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economic Planning and Industrial Policy in the Globalizing Economy

Part of the book series: Public Administration, Governance and Globalization ((PAGG,volume 13))

Abstract

This chapter discusses the different possible roles played by the Japanese government to enhance the total factor productivity (TFP) growth rate during the “growth miracle period” (1955–1973) as well as the “two lost decades” (1990–2009). The growth accounting exercise conducted in this chapter using the Japanese data shows that TFP was not only the driving force for the rapid economic growth of the growth miracle period but also a decline in the TFP growth rate was responsible for the sluggish economies, particularly in the 1990s. High net technology imports were demonstrated to have likely played an important role in the TFP’s rapid rise during the growth miracle period. However, possible causes behind the TFP’s slower growth rate during the “two lost decades” remains actively debated in literature. Caballero et al. (Am Econ Rev 98(5):1943–1977, 2008) offers the possible explanation of zombie firms, i.e., unproductive firms that should exit the market but survive because of support from banks or the government. If “zombie lending” is a major cause of slower TFP growth rate, opening the markets and letting firms compete through deregulation would be one promising policy the Japanese government could enact in order to boost the TFP growth rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the natural logarithm of a variable can be interpreted as the growth rate of that variable.

  2. 2.

    Data based on the 1993 System of National Accounts are available only for years after 1979. Data for earlier years are based on the 1968 SNA, which have been integrated with the 1993 SNA data by extending back the latter by the annual change in the corresponding 1968 SNA series.

  3. 3.

    The capital stock series are obtained using the perpetual inventory method, assuming that the initial capital-output ratio is 0.77 (the value is taken from Hayashi and Prescott 2002) and the depreciation rate is 0.1. The capital share of output is set to the conventional value of 1/3.

  4. 4.

    Also see Aoki et al. (2009) for a discussion of the driving forces of TFP growth in this period.

  5. 5.

    For instance, the average annual growth rate of real GDP in the USA was only 1.8 and 2.5 % during 1977–1982 and 1987–1992 compared to 4.5 % during 1982–1987. Similarly, the average annual growth rate of real GDP in the UK was only 2.2 % during 1980–1992 compared to 3.6 % during 1982–1987.

  6. 6.

    The causes of the drop in the within effect in the manufacturing sector in the 1990s remain unclear and warrant further research.

  7. 7.

    See Caballero et al. (2008) for details of how zombie firms are identified.

  8. 8.

    The zombie index for an industry is constructed by calculating the share of total assets held by zombie firms.

  9. 9.

    One possibility is that the rate of return on R&D investment declined in the 1990s and that this may be partly responsible for the slowdown in TFP growth. Kim et al. (2008), however, show that although the rate of return rate does decrease, the extent of this decrease is limited.

  10. 10.

    See Tett (2003) for the case of Shinsei Bank.

References

  • Ahn S, Fukao K, Kwon HU (2004) The internationalization and performance of Korean and Japanese firms: an empirical analysis based on micro data. Seoul J Econ 17(4):439–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki S, Esteban-Pretel J, Okazaki T, Sawada Y (2009) The role of the government in facilitating TFP growth during Japan’s Rapid Growth Era. CIRJE Discussion Paper, CIRJE-F-622, Faculty of Economics, Tokyo University

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin JR, Gu W (2006) Plant turnover and productivity growth in Canadian manufacturing. Ind Corp Chang 15:417–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero RJ, Hoshi T, Kashyap AK (2008) Zombie lending and depressed restructuring in Japan. Am Econ Rev 98(5):1943–1977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disney R, Haskel J, Heden Y (2003) Restructuring and productivity growth in UK manufacturing. Econ J 113:666–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster L, Haltiwanger JC, Krizan CJ (2001) Aggregate productivity growth, lessons from microeconomic evidence. In: Hulten CR, Dean ER, Harper MJ (eds) New contributions to productivity analysis. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 303–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukao K (2012) Ushinawareta Nijunen to Nihonkeizai [Two lost decades for the Japanese economy]. Nihon Keizai Shimbunsha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi F, Prescott EC (2002) The 1990s in Japan: a lost decade. Rev Econ Dyn 5:206–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YG, Kwon HU, Fukao K (2007) Kigyo-Jigyosho no Sannyu-Taishutsu to Sangyo Level no Seisansei [The Entry and Exit of Firms and Plants and Industry-Level Productivity). RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 07-J-022, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim YG, Kwon HU, Fukao K (2008) Kenkyu Kaihatsu to Seisansei Josho—Kigyo Level no Data niyoru Jisho Bunseki [R & D and Productivity Growth: An Empirical Analysis Based on Firm-Level Data]. Global COE Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series, No. 3, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn LH (1994) MITI’s successes and failures in controlling Japan’s technology imports. Hitotsubashi J Commer Manage 29(1):15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi Y. Inui T (2007) Kisei Kanwa to Sangyo no Performance [Deregulation and Productivity in Japanese Industries. Working Paper Series, No. 2007-3, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(2):S71–S102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tett G (2003) Saving the sun: a wall street gamble to rescue Japan from its trillion-dollar meltdown. HarperCollins, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeshi Niizeki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niizeki, T. (2015). Japan’s Economic Growth and the Role of Government. In: Yülek, M. (eds) Economic Planning and Industrial Policy in the Globalizing Economy. Public Administration, Governance and Globalization, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06474-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics