Abstract
This exploratory study characterizes two transdisciplinary human-centered design approaches for creating novel products or services for poverty alleviation. Transdisciplinary design involves the integrated use of tools, techniques, and methods from multiple disciplines in one holistic process. The term discipline includes academic fields of study that are taught in universities, as well as specialized expertise that are developed through life experience. Two pioneering organizations were selected to be exemplary case studies based on their high regard and influence within the design industry, social sector, and academia. This paper highlights similarities and differences between the design thinking approach practiced by IDEO.org (a nonprofit design consultancy) and the Creative Capacity Building approach developed by the International Development Design Summit (an educational organization hosting annual innovation conferences). IDEO.org’s teams of professionals (e.g., industrial designers or business strategists) develop innovative products and services for implementation by partners serving low-income communities. IDDS teaches people from diverse backgrounds (e.g., farmers, mechanics, students, teachers, doctors, and artisans) to create technologies and launch enterprises for poverty alleviation. The objective is not to determine which approach is better, but to determine what can be learned from IDEO.org about designing with established organizations, and from IDDS about teaching budding innovators to be grassroots change agents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnstein, S. R.: A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners. 35, 216–224 (1969).
Boujut, J., Blanco, E.: Intermediary objects as a means to foster co-operation in engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 12, 205–219 (2003).
Bigio, R., Ogbu, L., Friedberg, E., Vechakul, J., Shipp, J.: Water + Health in Kenya. Defining the Path to a Sustainable Business. IDEO.org, San Francisco, CA (2012).
Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues. 5–21 (1992).
Brown, T., Wyatt, J.: Design Thinking for Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. 30–35 (2010).
Brown, T.: Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. HarperBusiness (2009).
Brown, T.: Design thinking. Harvard Business Review. 86, 84–92 (2008).
Caruso, C., Frankel, L.: Everyday People: Enabling User Expertise in Socially Responsible Design. DRS (2010).
Das, S.: Automatic Chlorine Doser: Suprio Das at TEDxIIMShillong - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t9xPSlCRvc&noredirect=1 (2013).
Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., Leifer, L.: Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education. 94, 103–120 (2005).
Eisenbart, B., Blessing, L., Gericke, K.: Functional Modelling Perspectives Across Disciplines: A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 12th International Design Conference DESIGN 2012. 847–858 (2012).
Ertas, A., Maxwell, T., Rainey, V.P., Tanik, M.M.: Transformation of higher education: the transdisciplinary approach in engineering. Education, IEEE Transactions on. 46, 289–295 (2003).
Frayne, S.: Haddock Invention, https://www.haddockinvention.com/about/philosophy (2012).
Findeli, A.: Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design issues. 17, 5–17 (2001).
Gasson, S.: Human-centered vs. user-centered approaches. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application. 5, 29–46 (2003).
Hewens, S.: SmartLife is Open for Business Selling Pure Drinking Water, https://www.ideo.org/stories/smartlife-is-open-for-business-selling-pure-drinking-water (2012).
Leblanc, T.: Transdisciplinary Design Approach. Creativity and HCI: From Experience to Design in Education. 106–122 (2009).
Levine, D. I., A.M. Agogino, M. A. Lesniewski (2016). “Design for Impact: A Development Engineering Graduate Program at UC Berkeley,” 32 (3B), Journal of Development Engineering, pp. 1396–1406.
Lidgus, S.: When the Brand is a Service, https://www.ideo.org/stories/when-the-brand-is-a-service (2012).
Ogbu, L.: When the Design Challenge is the System Itself, https://www.ideo.org/stories/when-the-design-challenge-is-the-system-itself (2012).
Polanyi, M.: The tacit dimension. University of Chicago press (2009).
Scholz, R. W.: Mutual learning as a basic principle of transdisciplinarity. Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem-solving among science, technology and society. Workbook II: Mutual learning sessions. 13–17 (2000).
Taha, K.A.: Creative Capacity Building in Post-Conflict Uganda, (2011).
Tietje, O., Scholz, R.W.: Embedded case study methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. Sage Publications, Incorporated (2001).
Vechakul, J., Agogino, A.: Human-Centered Design for Social Impact: Case Studies of IDEO.org and the International Development Design Summit. PhD diss. University of California, Berkeley (2016).
Wahl, D.C., Baxter, S.: The designer’s role in facilitating sustainable solutions. Design Issues. 24, 72–83 (2008).
Acknowledgements
The lead author is grateful to have worked as a Fellow IDEO.org and to have served as an organizer, participant, and team mentor for IDDS. We note that this study was conducted independently of these organizations and the findings reflect the authors’ viewpoints, and not necessarily that of the organizations studied. This research was partially funded by NSF grant #1242232.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vechakul, J., Agogino, A. (2021). A Comparison of Two Transdisciplinary Human-Centered Design Approaches for Poverty Alleviation. In: Blessing, L., Qureshi, A.J., Gericke, K. (eds) The Future of Transdisciplinary Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06382-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06382-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06381-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06382-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)