Abstract
In the wide-ranging policy debate on data privacy, the economic impact of regulation has thus far received very little attention. Yet data privacy legislation has the potential to affect different groups and countries asymmetrically, leading to important redistributive effects. This paper aims to illustrate the economic impact of data regulation, using the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as an example, and using econometric methods (GTAP) commonly used in trade economics. GDPR introduces restrictions on cross-border trade flows, which affects input prices to the service industry, and in turn, EU exports, with a direct welfare effects on the EU is a loss of up to € 260 per European citizen. The findings of this study have important implications for the discussions around policy design and regulatory efficiency. The severe economic impact of the GDPR proposal demonstrates that data connectivity and economic interdependency effectively limit the policy space for non-economic regulation. Moreover, this paper shows that mercantilist data restrictions are counterproductive and affect the protecting market more than those who are restricted in accessing it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See also Lee-Makiyama (2013).
- 2.
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 2000/C 364/01.
- 3.
On The Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, Directive 95/46/EC.
- 4.
Floridi (2013).
- 5.
Inter alia, OECD (2005).
- 6.
Article 49, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
- 7.
Article 56, TFEU.
- 8.
WTO General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS); note the exception for ‘the protection of the privacy of individuals in relation to the processing and dissemination of personal data and the protection of confidentiality of individual records and accounts’ under Article 14.2. For its interpretation, see Hindley, Lee-Makiyama, Protectionism Online, ECIPE Working Paper, 12/2009.
- 9.
GTAP8, 2007.
- 10.
World Input Output Database, 2013.
- 11.
McKinsey Global Institute (2011).
- 12.
World Bank (2013).
- 13.
See note 12.
- 14.
UNCTAD (2009).
- 15.
European Commission, Impact Assessment, Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) and Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and the free movement of such data, SEC(2012) 72 final.
- 16.
Bauer et al. (2013).
- 17.
Narayanan et al. (2012).
- 18.
See note 15, United Kingdom (2012).
- 19.
Francois (2013).
- 20.
Andorra, Argentina, Canada, Faroe Islands, Guernsey, Iceland, Isle of Man, Israel, Jersey, Lichtenstein, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland and Uruguay.
- 21.
Multinational corporations commonly employ legal constructs like model contract clauses (MCCs) or binding corporate rules (BCRs).
- 22.
See note 20.
- 23.
See note 17.
- 24.
Using final private consumption with constant prices (2005), Eurostat (2014).
- 25.
Eurostat (2013).
- 26.
- 27.
See EU–South Korea Free Trade Agreement, Art. 7.43.
- 28.
Castro (2013).
- 29.
- 30.
Erixon (2009).
References
Baldwin, R. 2012. Global manufacturing value chains and trade rules. World Economic Forum.
Bauer, Erixon, Lee-Makiyama, Krol, and Bert Verschelde. 2013. The economic importance of getting data protection right. European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE).
Brown, A. G., and R. M. Stern. 2006. Global market integration and national sovereignty. World Economy.
Castro, D. 2013 August. How much will PRISM cost the U.S. Cloud computing industry?, ITIF.
Cooper, R. N. 1968. The economics of interdependence: Economic policy in the Atlantic community. Council on foreign relations.
Erixon, F. 2009. Twilight of soft mercantilism: Europe and foreign economic power. Europe’s world, 13/2009.
European Commission. On the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Directive 95/46/EC.
European Commission. Impact assessment, regulation of the European parliament and of the council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) and Directive of the European parliament and of the council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and the free movement of such data, SEC(2012) 72 final.
European Union. 2000. Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union, 2000/C 364/01.
European Union. Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Floridi, L. 2013. The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era, (Introduction).
Francois, J. 2013. Reducing transatlantic barriers to trade and investment: An economic assessment. CEPR.
Lee-Makiyama, H. 2013. Testimony to the US international trade commission. Digital trade in the U.S. and global economies. Investigation no. 332–531.
Mayer, J. 2009. Policy space: What, for what, and where? Development Policy Review.
McKinsey Global Institute. Internet matters: The net’s sweeping impact on growth, jobs, and prosperity.
Miroudot, Sebastian. 2012. Trade policy implication of global value chains: Scoping paper, OECD.
Narayanan, G., Angel A. Badri, and R. McDougall, eds. 2012. Global trade, assistance, and production: The GTAP 8 data base. Center for Global Trade Analysis.
OECD. 2005. Input to the United Nations working group on internet governance, DSTI/ICCP(2005)4.
World Bank. 2013. World Bank Data.
World Trade Organization. General agreement on trade in services (GATS).
UNCTAD. 2009. Information Economy Report.
United Kingdom. 2012. Ministry of justice, impact assessment on proposal for EU data protection regulation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee-Makiyama, H. (2014). The Political Economy of Data: EU Privacy Regulation and the International Redistribution of Its Costs. In: Floridi, L. (eds) Protection of Information and the Right to Privacy - A New Equilibrium?. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05720-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05720-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05719-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05720-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)