Abstract
There is a long history to the debate on the relationship between law and morality. To date, there is no clear consensus over basic questions like the extent that the substantive content of ‘law’ needs to be consistent with the moral requirements for it to be properly law. Whether there is a relationship at all depends very much on what one takes to be ‘law’ and how ‘morality’ should be understood. While it may not be a rewarding exercise to presently rehearse a debate that is well documented in the literature, fresh insights may nevertheless be gained through a more explicitly contextual evaluation. The debate may then be framed in the following manner: ‘What is the relationship (if any) between law and morality in bioethics?’ By this question, bioethics is used contextually to refer to a system of interrelated knowledge and practices that apply to the governance of biomedical research and medicine, as well as policies on these fields. It is argued that law and morality enjoys a firm and intricate relationship in bioethics, and they are mutually constitutive. Drawing on Anglo-American jurisprudence, ‘mental capacity’ in relation to mentally disabled or mentally ill persons is discussed as illustration of a phenomenon that is co-produced by law and morality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Brody, B. A. (2004). Law and morality. In S. G. Post (Ed.), The encyclopedia of bioethics (pp. 1375–1380). New York: Macmillan Reference.
Capron, A. M. (2004). Law and bioethics. In S. G. Post (Ed.), The encyclopedia of bioethics (pp. 1369–1375). New York: Macmillan Reference.
Dworkin, R. M. (1998). Law’s empire. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Finnis, J. (1980). Natural law and natural rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Finnis, J. (2014). Natural law theories. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/natural-law-theories/
Fox, R., & Swazey, J. (2008). Observing bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fuller, L. (1969). The morality of law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Green, L. (2009). Legal positivism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/legal-positivism/
Habermas, J. (W. Rehg, Trans.) (1998). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The concept of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure theory of law. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Kuhse, H., & Singer, P. (2009). What is bioethics? A historical introduction. In H. Kuhse & P. Singer (Eds.), A companion to bioethics (pp. 3–11). London: Blackwell.
Smith, M. (1999). Morality and law. In C. B. Gray (Ed.), The philosophy of law – An encyclopedia (pp. 567–570). New York: Routledge.
Van der Burg, W. (2009). Law and bioethics. In H. Kuhse & P. Singer (Eds.), A companion to bioethics (pp. 56–63). London: Blackwell.
Further Readings
Campbell, A. V. (2013). Bioethics: The basics. London: Routledge.
Freeman, M. D. A. (2014). Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Hacker, P. M. S. (1977). Hart’s philosophy of law. In P. M. S. Hacker & J. Raz (Eds.), Law, morality, and society: Essays in honour of H.L.A. Hart (pp. 1–25). Oxford: Clarendon.
Himma, K. E. (2015). Internet encyclopedia of philosophy: Natural law. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/natlaw/
Ratnapala, S. (2009). Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ho, C.W.L., Lee, S.M. (2015). Law and Morality. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_264-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_264-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities