Skip to main content

Humanitarian Action

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Abstract

Humanitarian action is the active provision of aid designed to save lives, alleviate suffering, and restore and promote human dignity in the wake of disasters and during large-scale emergencies. The humanitarian action that is the focus of this entry is the Dunantist tradition of humanitarianism that adheres to the humanitarian principles of impartiality, neutrality, and independence. In its current form, humanitarian action is enshrined in international humanitarian law and provided by intergovernmental organizations and international nongovernmental organizations. Bioethical issues are numerous and profound. Humanitarian action constantly negotiates between a minimalist and secondary morality, struggling to save lives but also to further human dignity among adversity and animosity. It challenges current arrangements of power and demonstrates an ethic of refusal. The work can be dangerous and aid workers and the populations they aim to serve face resource scarcity, tragic choices, and physical and psychological traumas. Humanitarian organizations struggle to find an ethical foothold under neoliberal globalization, so as to fulfill humanitarian objectives without reinforcing a global economic system that makes life so precarious for so many. While humanitarian action is context specific, it remains a coherent and collective expression of compassion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnett, M. (2011). Empire of humanity: A history of humanitarianism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudry, A., & Kapoor, D. (Eds.). (2013). NGOization: Complicity, contradictions and prospects. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard African Students Association Political Action Committee. (2015, February 25). The “Africanization” of Ebola. Harvard Political Review. http://harvardpolitics.com/world/africanization-ebola/. Accessed 7 Apr 2015.

  • Hofman, M., & Delaunay, S. (2010). Afghanistan: A return to humanitarian action. MSF Special Report. http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/news-stories/special-report/afghanistan-return-humanitarian-action. Accessed 7 Apr 2015.

  • Levich, J. (2014). The real agenda of the Gates Foundation. Research Unit for Political Economy, 57. http://www.rupe-india.org/57/gates.html. Accessed 7 Apr 2015.

  • Magone, C., Neuman, M., & Weissman, F. (Eds.). (2011). Humanitarian negotiations revealed: The MSF experience. London: MSF and Hurst Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • MSF. (1999). Nobel lecture: Nobel Peace Prize, Médecins Sans Frontières. Retrieved from http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1999/msf-lecture.html

  • Pogge, T. (2008). World poverty and human rights: Cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polman, L. (2011). The crisis caravan: What’s wrong with humanitarian aid? New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raich, J. (2002). Ethical evolution of the humanitarian idea. Barcelona: MSF. www.jordi-raich.com/Articulos/A18-Evolucion.pdf

  • Schwartz, L., Sinding, C., Hunt, M., Elit, L., Redwood-Campbell, L., Adelson, N., Luther, L., Ranford, J., & DeLaat, S. (2010). Ethics in humanitarian aid work: Learning from the narratives of humanitarian health workers. AJOB Primary Research, 1(3), 45–54. doi:10.1080/21507716.2010.505898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1972). Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slim, H. (2003). Is humanitarianism being politicised? A reply to David Rieff. The Hague: The Dutch Red Cross Symposium on Ethics in Aid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, A. (2003). Humanitarian NGOs: Challenges and trends. In J. Macrae & A. Harmer (Eds.), Humanitarian action and the ‘global war on terror’: A review of trends and issues (HPG report 14). London: ODI.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Have, H. (2013). Global bioethics: Transnational experiences and Islamic bioethics. Zygon, 48(3), 608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, T. (2004). NGO dilemmas: Trojan horses for global neoliberalism? Socialist Register, 40, 202–219.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Barnett, M. (2011). Empire of humanity: A history of humanitarianism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. C. (2015). Doctors without borders: Humanitarian quests, impossible dreams of Médecins Sans Frontières. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. (1996). Champions of charity: War and the rise of the Red Cross. Oxford: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slim, H. (2015). Humanitarian ethics: A guide to the morality of aid in war and disaster. London: Hurst Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Pringle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Pringle, J., Hunt, M. (2015). Humanitarian Action. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_235-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_235-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics