Skip to main content

Genetic Determinism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Abstract

Genetic determinism is the idea that, although environmental factors play a role as well, we basically are our genes, so that the personal genome (i.e., the genetic material of an individual) not only provides us with self-understanding but may also enable us to become the managers of our own life. This idea fuelled the Human Genome Project, meant to grant human beings access to their own “blueprint,” as HGP director Francis Collins phrased it. Paradoxically, however, the HGP undermined its own conceptual starting point by demonstrating, once and for all (so it seems), that genetic determinism is untenable, indeed: that genetic determinism is “dead.” At the same time, it is “undead” because, notwithstanding the emphasis on complexity that dominates the various forms of post-genomics research, the language and logic of genetic determinism keeps recurring in contemporary discourse, both in the public and in the scholarly domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benjamin, J., Li, L., Patterson, C., Greenberg, B., Murphy, D. L., & Hamer, D. (1996). Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of novelty seeking. Nature Genetics, 12, 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, R., & Zwart, H. (2013). From ELSA to responsible research and promisomics. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 9, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, F. (2010). Has the revolution arrived? Nature, 464, 674–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, M. (2006). Next. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, K. (2010). The $1,000 genome: The revolution in DNA sequencing and the New Era of personalized medicine. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, D. (2004). Understanding contemporary genomics. Perspectives on Science, 12(3), 320–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Düwell, M., Rehmann-Sutter, C., & Mieth, D. (2008). The contingent nature of life. Bioethics and the limits of human existence. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J., & Beaver, K. M. (2009). Natural born killers: The genetic origins of extreme violence. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 14(5), 286–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox Keller, E. (2000). The century of the gene. Cambridge, M.A: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. (2001, February 19). Humbled by the genome’s mysteries. New York: New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P. E. (2006). The fearless vampire conservator: Philip Kitcher, genetic determinism and the informational gene. In C. Rehmann-Sutter & E. M. Neumann-Held (Eds.), Genes in development: Rethinking the molecular paradigm (pp. 175–198). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, D., & Copeland, P. (1998). Living with our genes. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, E. (2010). Human genome at ten: Life is complicated. Nature, 464, 664–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. (1830/1970) Werke 9: Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse II: Die Naturphilosophie, mit den mündlichen Zusätzen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houellebecq, M. (1998). Les Particules Élémentaires. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerner, C. (1999). Blaupause. Weinheim: Beltz & Gelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo-Martin, I. de. (2005). Firing up the nature/nurture controversy: bioethics and genetic determinism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(9), 526–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D., & Lindee, S. (1995/2004). The DNA mystique: the gene as a cultural icon (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E. (1944/1967). What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell/mind and matter. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1972). Hermes II: L’interférence. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, H. (2007a). Genomics and self-knowledge. Implications for societal research and debate. New Genetics and Society, 26(2), 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, H. (2007b). Next [book review]. Genomics, Society and Policy, 3(1), 48–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, H. (2011). Francis Collins: The language of life. Book review. Genomics, Society and Policy, 6(3), 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, H. (2013). Woyzeck and the birth of the human research subject. Genetic disposition and the nature-nurture debate through the looking-glass of fiction. Bioethica Forum, 6(3), 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Nusslein-Volhard, C. (2006). Coming to life: How genes drive development. Carlesbad: Kales Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hub Zwart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Zwart, H. (2014). Genetic Determinism. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_208-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_208-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics