Skip to main content

Electronic Patient Records

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Abstract

Electronic patient records (EPRs) are electronic versions of traditional paper-based patient records (PBRs). They contain a patient’s medical history inclusive of diagnoses, medications, immunizations, family medical history, etc. as well as contact information. They may also contain radiological images and other diagnostic data not generally found in PBRs. Informatically, they function as patient analogues in decision space. Being electronic in nature, they can be transferred to data storage devices and be electronically transmitted, received, retrieved, searched, linked, or otherwise manipulated for various health-care-related purposes. They are increasingly replacing PBRs because they facilitate efficient and cost-effective health-care delivery and planning and make possible eHealth and telemedicine – the practice of providing medical care to geographically distanced patients through electronic communication and information technologies. However, they also raise ethical concerns that center in privacy and confidentiality, and the technical problems they encounter – integrity, security, and interoperability as well as updating legacy systems – present ethical problems in their own right. Issues such as ownership and secondary use for research also assume new dimensions, and the outsourcing of EPR-related services introduces legal complications that can undermine the standard ethics of patient records.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alanazi, H. O., Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Kiah, M. L., & Al-Bakri, S. H. (2015). Meeting the security requirements of electronic medical records in the ERA of high-speed computing. Journal of Medical Systems, 39(1), 165. doi:10.1007/s10916-014-0165-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisbal, J., Lawless, D., Wu, B., & Grimson, J. (1999). Legacy information systems: Issues and directions. IEEE Software, 16, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodnik, M., McCain, M. C., et al. (2009). Fundamentals of law for health informatics and information management (p. 239). Chicago: AHIMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T. S., Liu, C. H., Chen, T. L., Chen, C. S., Bau, J. G., & Lin, T. C. (2012). Secure dynamic access control scheme of PHR in cloud computing. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(6), 4005–4020. doi:10.1007/s10916-012-9873-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. W., Berner, E. S., Dente, M. A., Kaplan, B., Koppel, R., Rucker, D., Sands, D. Z., & Winkelstein, P. (2011). Challenges in ethics, safety, best practices, and oversight regarding HIT vendors, their customers, and patients: a report of an AMIA special task force. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(1), 77–81. doi:10.1136/jamia.2010.008946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, M. (2008). Archives and record management (pp. 47 ff). New Delhi: Global India Publications Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, J. (2013). Selling Guantánamo (pp. 180–181). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, E. H. (2001). The ethics of electronic patient records. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, E. H. (2008). Electronic health records: Why does ethics count? In A. W. Kushniruk & E. Borycki (Eds.), Human, social and organizational aspects of health information systems (pp. 283–295). London/Hershey: Information Science Reference. Chapter XVII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutscher, B. (2012). Expertise on call: Annual outsourcing report shows providers of all sizes continue to pursue arrangements that offer savings for their revenue-strapped operations. Mod Healthc, 42(36), 20, 22, 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. H., & Sim, I. (2004). Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: Barriers and solutions. Health Affairs, 23(2), 116–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, S. H. (2007). Medical ethics and the interrogation of Guantanamo 063. The American Journal of Bioethics, 7(4), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, E. L. (2010). The evolving medical record. Annals of Internal Medicine, 153(10), 671–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Royal College of Radiologists. (2010). Teleradiology and outsourcing census. Accessed 13 Feb 2015 at http://www.rcr.ac.uk/docs/radiology/pdf/BFCR%2810%298_Teleradiology_census.pdf

  • Tran, K., Polisena, J., Coyle, D., Coyle, K., Kluge, E.-H. W., Cimon, K., McGill, S., Noorani, H., Palmer, K., & Scott, R. (2008). Home telehealth for chronic disease management. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Kluge, E.-H. W. (2001). The ethics of electronic patient records. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushniruk, A. W., & Borycki, E. M. (2008). Human, social, and organizational aspects of health information systems. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Layman, E. J. (2008). Ethical issues and the electronic health record. Health Care Management (Frederick), 27(2), 165–176. doi:10.1097/01.HCM.0000285044.19666.a8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sittig, D. F., & Singh, H. (2011). Legal, ethical, and financial dilemmas in electronic health record adoption and use. Pediatrics, 127(4), e1042–e1047. doi:10.1542/peds.2010-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eike-Henner W. Kluge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kluge, EH.W. (2015). Electronic Patient Records. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_168-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_168-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics