Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Education: Goals

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

The first bioethics courses were offered in the 1960s, and with them began a still ongoing debate on the goals of bioethics education. Should ethics education equip students with the necessary tools to make ethically sound decisions, or should the aim be more ambitious: to produce virtuous professionals? Or could ethics education even be a cure for all that is morally wrong within the practice of medicine?

Nowadays, the debate on goals still continues, but the themes are roughly the same as, say, 20 years ago. Important reasons for this slow progress seem to be a lack of consensus on underlying theoretical meta-ethical assumptions and imprecise use of concepts, especially when it comes to teaching bioethics in the context of medical professionalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clouser, K. D. (1980). Teaching bioethics: Strategies, problems, and resources. Hastings-on-Hudson: Hastings Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, C. (2005). The dangers of medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(12), 739–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruess, R. L., & Cruess, S. R. (2008). The cognitive base of professionalism. In R. L. Cruess, S. R. Cruess, & Y. Steinert (Eds.), Teaching medical professionalism (pp. 7–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R., & Steinert, Y. (Eds.). (2008). Teaching medical professionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckles, R. E., Meslin, E. M., Gaffey, M., & Helft, P. R. (2005). Medical ethics education: Where are we? Where should we be going? A review. Academic Medicine, 80(12), 1143–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. (2007). Ethics in the first person. A guide to teaching and learning practical ethics. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. R. (Ed.). (2005). The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafferty, F. W., & Franks, R. (1994). The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Academic Medicine, 69(11), 861–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harden, R. M. (2002). Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: Is there a difference? Medical Teacher, 24(2), 151–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, S. H., Lane, L. W., Bickel, J., Walker, R. M., & Cassel, C. K. (1989). Medical ethics education: Coming of age. Academic Medicine, 64(12), 705–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2012). Philosophy of education (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, B. (2010). How to teach moral theories in applied ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(10), 635–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, E., Lloyd, M., Higgs, R., & Boyd, K. (2013). Fifty years of medical ethics: From the London Medical Group to the Institute of Medical Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(11), 662–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirrat, G. M., Johnston, C., Gillon, R., & Boyd, K. (2010). Medical ethics and law for doctors of tomorrow: The 1998 Consensus Statement updated. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(1), 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2008). Bioethics core curriculum. Section 1: Syllabus ethics education programme. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkerk, M. A., De Bree, M. J., & Mourits, M. J. E. (2007). Reflective professionalism: Interpreting CanMEDS’ “professionalism”. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(11), 663–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Arras, J. (2013). Theory and bioethics/a taxonomy of theoretical work in bioethics. In: E. N. Zalta (Eds), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2013 ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/theory-bioethics/. Accessed 6 May 2015.

  • Brainard, A. H., & Brislen, H. C. (2007). Learning professionalism: A view from the trenches. Academic Medicine, 82(11), 1010–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J., & Von Troil, H. (Eds.). (2004). How to best teach bioethics: Report from a workshop March 2003 organized by The Nordic Committee on Bioethics and NorFA. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, N. E. (2010). Virtue as social intelligence. An empirically grounded theory. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Medical Education, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Menno de Bree

Authors
  1. Menno de Bree
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Menno de Bree .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Duquesne University Center for Healthcare Ethics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

    Henk ten Have

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

de Bree, M. (2015). Education: Goals. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_160-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_160-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation