Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

The chapter briefly introduces the theoretical framework of Abstraction in Context (AiC) by referring to the data from Chap. 2. AiC provides a model of nested epistemic actions for investigating, at a micro-analytic level, learning processes which lead to new (to the learner) constructs (concepts, strategies, …). AiC posits three phases: the need for a new construct, the emergence of the new construct, and its consolidation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalisation in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula (Soviet studies in mathematics education, Vol. 2, J. Kilpatrick, Ed., J. Teller, Trans.). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (Original work published 1972.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, T., & Kidron, I. (2006). Interacting parallel constructions: A solitary learner and the bifurcation diagram. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 26(3), 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, T., & Tsamir, P. (2004). Ben’s consolidation of knowledge structures about infinite sets. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 271–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2015). The nested epistemic actions model for abstraction in context – Theory as a methodological tool and methodological tool as theory. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: Examples of methodology and methods (Advances in mathematics education series). New York: Springer (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. China lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giest, H. (2005). Zum Verhältnis von Konstruktivismus und Tätigkeitsansatz in der Pädagogik. In F. Radis, M.-L. Braunsteiner & K. Klement (Eds.), Badener VorDrucke (pp. 43–64). Baden/A.: Kompetenzzentrum für Forschung und Entwicklung (Schriftenreihe zur Bildungsforschung – Band 3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, R. (2009). Contour lines between a model as a theoretical framework and the same model as methodological tool. In B. B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 273–280). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, R., Dreyfus, T., Ben-Zvi, D., Friedlander, A., Hadas, N., Resnick, T., Tabach, M., & Schwarz, B. (2002). Mathematics curriculum development for computerised environments: A designer-researcher-teacher-learner activity. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education: Directions for the 21st century (pp. 657–694). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidron, I., & Dreyfus, T. (2010a). Justification enlightenment and combining constructions of knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(1), 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidron, I., & Dreyfus, T. (2010b). Interacting parallel constructions of knowledge in a CAS context. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15(2), 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidron, I., & Monaghan, J. (2009). Commentary on the chapters on the construction of knowledge. In B. B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 81–90). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidron, I., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., Cramer, J., Dreyfus, T., & Gilboa, N. (2010). Construction of knowledge: Need and interest. In M. M. F. Pinto & T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 169–176). Belo Horizonte: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ron, G., Dreyfus, T., & Hershkowitz, R. (2010). Partially correct constructs illuminate students’ inconsistent answers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75, 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B. B., Dreyfus, T., & Hershkowitz, R. (2009). The nested epistemic actions model for abstraction in context. In B. B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 11–41). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommy Dreyfus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dreyfus, T., Kidron, I. (2014). Introduction to Abstraction in Context (AiC). In: Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., Prediger, S. (eds) Networking of Theories as a Research Practice in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05389-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics