Abstract
A standard account of understanding—one that is especially prevalent in the philosophy of science—treats understanding as essentially a type of knowledge—viz., knowledge of causes. Unfortunately, this proposal is untenable, in that there are cases of genuine understanding where the relevant knowledge is lacking, and cases where the relevant knowledge is present but understanding is lacking. In light of these problems, I propose an alternative view which treats understanding as a kind of cognitive achievement. In recent work, however, Stephen Grimm has argued for an adapted version of the view that understanding is constituted by knowledge of causes, one that appeals to a kind of knowledge of causes which is non-propositional. I argue that Grimm’s proposal, while admittedly ingenious, does not stand up to close scrutiny.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Note that we are here implicitly focussing on a particular kind of understanding, one which concerns understanding why something quite specific is the case. Typically, this will involve knowing why a specific event occurred. This kind of understanding is sometimes contrasted with a more general kind of understanding which concerns, say, an entire subject matter (e.g., ‘S understands quantum physics’). While there are connections between the two kinds of understanding, and while one would clearly desire an account of understanding which could accommodate both types, it would take us too far from the main thread to consider this more general notion of understanding here. For further discussion of these two types of understanding, see Brogaard (2007) and Kvanvig (2009).
- 2.
Consider the following remark made by Lipton, for example:
Understanding is not some sort of super-knowledge, but simply more knowledge: knowledge of causes. (Lipton 2004, 30)
Grimm (2014) also attributes the knowledge account, broadly conceived anyway, to Aristotle, Lewis (1986), Miller (1987), Strevens (2008) and Greco (2014).
- 3.
It is specifically environmental epistemic luck which is at issue in the famous ‘barn façade’ case, or so I have argued anyway. See, for example, Pritchard (2009) for more on this point.
- 4.
- 5.
Interestingly, Kvanvig (2003) argues that understanding, unlike knowledge, is compatible with the kind of epistemic luck at issue in standard Gettier-style cases too. As I claim in Pritchard (2009), however, I think he reaches this conclusion because he fails to make the distinction between standard Gettier-style epistemic luck and environmental epistemic luck.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
I think that what is muddying the waters here is that the example that Grimm focuses on—found in earlier work by myself (see, e.g., Pritchard 2009)—concerns a child who gains knowledge of the cause of an event while nonetheless lacking the corresponding understanding. As such, it is perhaps natural to wonder, as Grimm does, whether this child really does have knowledge of the cause that is being credited to her. As the case of ‘Kate*’ here illustrates, however, it is entirely incidental to this objection to the knowledge account that the agent concerned is a child.
- 11.
- 12.
References
Achinstein, P. 1983. The nature of explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BonJour, L. 1998. In defense of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BonJour, L. 2001. Replies. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 673–698.
BonJour, L. 2005. In defense of the a priori. In Contemporary debates in epistemology, ed. M. Steup and E. Sosa, 98–105. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brogaard, B. 2007. I know. Therefore, I understand. typescript.
Evans, G. 1979. Reference and contingency. The Monist 52: 161–189.
Greco, J. 2003. Knowledge as credit for true belief. In Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology, ed. M. DePaul and L. Zagzebski, 111–134. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greco, J. 2007. The nature of ability and the purpose of knowledge. Philosophical Issues 17: 57–69.
Greco, J. 2008. What’s wrong with contextualism? Philosophical Quarterly 58: 416–436.
Greco, J. 2009a. Achieving knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greco, J. 2009b. The value problem. In Epistemic value, ed. A. Haddock, A. Millar, and D.H. Pritchard, 313–321. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greco, J. 2009c. Knowledge and success from ability. Philosophical Studies 142: 17–26.
Greco, J. 2014. Chapter 13 – Episteme: Knowledge and understanding. In Virtues and their vices, ed. Kevin Timpe and Craig Boyd. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grimm, S. 2006. Is understanding a species of knowledge? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57: 515–535.
Grimm, S. 2010. Understanding. In The routledge companion to epistemology, ed. S. Bernecker and D.H. Pritchard, 84–94. London: Routledge.
Grimm, S. 2014. Understanding as knowledge of causes. In Virtue scientia, ed. A. Fairweather. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hetherington, S. 2013. There can be lucky knowledge. In Contemporary debates in epistemology, 2nd ed, ed. M. Steup and J. Turri. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hills, A. 2009. Moral testimony and moral epistemology. Ethics 120: 94–127.
Hills, A. 2010. The beloved self: Morality and the challenge from egoism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kitcher, P. 2002. Scientific knowledge. In Oxford handbook of epistemology, ed. P. Moser. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kvanvig, J. 2003. The value of knowledge and the pursuit of understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kvanvig, J. 2009. The value of understanding. In Epistemic value, ed. A. Haddock, A. Millar, and D.H. Pritchard, 95–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. 1986. Causal explanation. In his Philosophical papers (vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lipton, P. 2004. Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.
Miller, R. 1987. Fact and method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pritchard, D.H. 2009. Knowledge, understanding and epistemic value. In Epistemology, Royal institute of philosophy lectures, ed. A. O’Hear, 19–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pritchard, D.H. 2010. Achievements, luck and value. Think 25: 1–12.
Pritchard, D.H. 2012. Anti-luck virtue epistemology. Journal of Philosophy 109: 247–279.
Pritchard, D.H. 2013. There cannot be lucky knowledge. In Contemporary debates in epistemology, 2nd ed, ed. M. Steup and J. Turri. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pritchard, D.H., A. Millar, and A. Haddock. 2010. The nature and value of knowledge: Three investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Salmon, W. 1989. Four decades of scientific explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sosa, E. 1988. Beyond skepticism, to the best of our knowledge. Mind 97: 153–189.
Sosa, E. 1991. Knowledge in perspective: Selected essays in epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sosa, E. 2007. A virtue epistemology: Apt belief and reflective knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon.
Sosa, E. 2009. Reflective knowledge: Apt belief and reflective knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon.
Strevens, M. 2008. Depth: An account of scientific explanation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Woodward, J. 2003. Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zagzebski, L. 1996. Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zagzebski, L. 1999. What is knowledge? In The Blackwell guide to epistemology, ed. J. Greco and E. Sosa, 92–116. Oxford: Blackwell.
Acknowledgements
This paper was written while I was in receipt of a Phillip Leverhulme Prize, and I am grateful to them for their support. Thanks also to Abrol Fairweather, Georgi Gardiner, Emma Gordon, Allan Hazlett, Alison Hills, Andrew Mason and Lani Watson for helpful discussions of topics related to this paper. Special thanks to Stephen Grimm and Dory Scaltsas.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pritchard, D. (2014). Knowledge and Understanding. In: Fairweather, A. (eds) Virtue Epistemology Naturalized. Synthese Library, vol 366. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04672-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04672-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04671-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04672-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)