Skip to main content

Abstract

In most real life situations we are confronted not only with one single source of risk or one single risk, but with several sources of risk or combinations of risks. An important question is whether individual risks influence each other or not. This may involve the time of their occurrence and/or their severity. In other words, we need to understand how to model and describe the dependence structure of risks. Clearly, if risks influence each other in such a way that they tend to occur together and increase the severity of the overall risk, then the situation may be much more dangerous than otherwise.

We illustrate this with a concrete example. Consider a building which could be hit by an earthquake and a flood. If the building is situated on the Japanese coast, an earthquake may damage the building and cause a tsunami, which in turn floods the building. Hence, it is quite likely that by these two combined sources of risk a particularly disastrous event occurs. In other words, there is a strong positive dependence between these two risks (high damage from an earthquake will often come along with high damage from a flood). This does not mean that they always occur together, since an earthquake does not necessarily cause a tsunami, and there may be a flood caused only by heavy rain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Selected Bibliography

  1. P. Embrechts, A.J. McNeil, D. Straumann, Correlation: pitfalls and alternatives. Risk Mag. May, 69–71 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Embrechts, A.J. McNeil, D. Straumann, Correlation and dependence in risk management: properties and pitfalls, in Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond, ed. by M.H.A. Dempster (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2002), pp. 176–223

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Embrechts, F. Lindskog, A.J. McNeil, Modelling dependence with copulas and applications to risk management, in Handbook of Heavy Tailed Distributions in Finance, ed. by S.T. Rachev (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003), pp. 329–384, Chap. 8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. K.-T. Fang, S. Kotz, K.-W. Ng, Symmetric Multivariate and Related Distributions (Chapman & Hall, London, 1990)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Haug, C. Klüppelberg, L. Peng, Statistical models and methods for dependent insurance data. J. Korean Stat. Soc. 40, 125–139 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Klüppelberg, G. Kuhn, Copula structure analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B, Stat. Methodol. 71, 737–753 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Kurowicka, H. Joe (eds.), Dependence Modeling: Vine Copula Handbook (World Scientific, Singapore, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. McNeil, R. Frey, P. Embrechts, Quantitative Risk Management. Princeton Series in Finance (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Nelsen, An Introduction to Copulas, 2nd edn. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 139 (Springer, New York, 2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Straub, Engineering risk assessment, in Risk – A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by C. Klüppelberg, D. Straub, I. Welpe (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y.L. Tong, The Multivariate Normal Distribution (Springer, New York, 1990)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Additional Literature

  1. K. Aas, C. Czado, A. Frigessi, H. Bakken, Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence. Insur. Math. Econ. 44(2), 182–198 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. K.F. Bannör, M. Scherer, Model risk and uncertainty—illustrated with examples from mathematical finance, in Risk – A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by C. Klüppelberg, D. Straub, I. Welpe (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Beirlant, Y. Goegebeur, J. Segers, J. Teugels, Statistics of Extremes (Wiley, Chichester, 2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Biagini, T. Meyer-Brandis, G. Svindland, The mathematical concept of measuring risk, in Risk – A Multidisciplinary Introduction ed. by C. Klüppelberg, D. Straub, I. Welpe (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Böcker, C. Klüppelberg, Modelling and measuring multivariate operational risk with Lévy copulas. J. Oper. Risk 3(2), 3–27 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Coles, An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values (Springer, London, 2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Cont, Y.H. Kan, Statistical modeling of Credit Default Swaps Portfolios. Working paper (2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1771862

  8. S. Demarta, A.J. McNeil, The t copula and related copulas. Int. Stat. Rev. 73(1), 111–129 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Fasen, C. Klüppelberg, A. Menzel, Quantifying extreme risks, in Risk – A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by C. Klüppelberg, D. Straub, I. Welpe (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. G.A. Fredricks, R.B. Nelsen, On the relationship between Spearman’s rho and Kendall’s tau for pairs of continuous random variables. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 137(7), 2143–2150 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Hohenbichler, R. Rackwitz, Non-normal dependent vectors in structural safety. J. Eng. Mech. Div., ASCE 107(6), 1227–1249 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Joe, Families of min-stable multivariate exponential and multivariate extreme value distributions. Stat. Probab. Lett. 9(1), 75–81 (1990)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Kelker, Distribution theory of spherical distributions and a location-scale parameter generalization. Sankhyā, Indian J. Stat., Ser. A 32, 419–438 (1970)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. D.X. Li, On default correlation: a copula function approach. J. Fixed Income 9, 43–54 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P.-L. Liu, A. Der Kiureghian, Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances. Probab. Eng. Mech. 1(2), 105–112 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  16. R.B. Nelsen, On measures of association as measures of positive dependence. Stat. Probab. Lett. 14(4), 269–274 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. R.-D. Reiss, M. Thomas, Statistical Analysis of Extreme Values with Applications to Insurance, Finance, Hydrology and Other Fields, 2nd edn. (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. S.I. Resnick, Extreme Values, Regular Variation, and Point Processes., 2nd edn. (Springer, New York, 1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Wilson Lauw for preparing large parts of the figures during his research internship at Ulm University. Financial support by the Institute for Advanced Study of the Technische Universität München (TUM-IAS) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Stelzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klüppelberg, C., Stelzer, R. (2014). Dealing with Dependent Risks. In: Klüppelberg, C., Straub, D., Welpe, I. (eds) Risk - A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04486-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics