Abstract
Acetabular fractures constitute 18 % of pelvic injuries and most often occur in young adults involved in high-energy motor vehicle collisions or falls from a height. The treatment of acetabular fractures is a complex area of orthopaedics that is continually refined. Patients with acetabular fractures often have multiple injuries, and the initial approach to evaluation should follow ATLS guidelines. CT scan is currently the best diagnosis tool in the acetabular fracture assessment. There are several acetabular fracture classification schemes. However, the most widely used is the Judet-Letournel classification scheme. Nondisplaced fractures or displaced fractures that do not involve the dome of the acetabulum are treated nonsurgically, except posterior wall fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation, as for any other intra-articular fracture, is now a standard treatment for a displaced acetabular fracture. The approach selected depends on pattern and location of the fracture: ilioinguinal or modified Stoppa for anterior fractures and Kocher-Langenbeck for posterior fractures. Both-column fractures may require both an anterior and a posterior approach. Early complications include deep vein thrombosis, post-traumatic nerve palsies (16.4 %), and wound infection (4–5 %). Late complications are as follows: heterotopic ossification (25.6 %), osteoarthritis (26 %), and avascular necrosis (3–53 %). 8.5 % of the patients require total hip arthroplasty 2 years following the initial procedure. The treatment of these fractures sets high demands and needs to be in the hands of experts. In these cases, an excellent or good functional outcome can be expected in between 83 and 89 % of patients with an anatomical reduction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Giannoudis PV, Bircher M, Pohlemann T (2007) Advances in pelvic and acetabular surgery. Injury 38:395–396
Judet R, Judet J, Leturnel E (1964) Fractures of the acetabulum. Classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46:1615–1636
Lawrence DA, Menn K, Baumgaertner M, Haims AH (2013) Acetabular fractures: anatomic and clinical considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W425–W436
Lenarz CJ, Moed BR (2007) A typical anterior wall fracture of the acetabulum: case series of anterior acetabular rim fracture without involvement of the pelvic brim. J Orthop Trauma 21:515–522
Alonso JE, Volgas DA, Giordano V, Stannard JP (2000) A review of the treatment of hip dislocation associated with acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 377:32–43
O’Toole RV, Cox G, Shanmuganathan K et al (2010) Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24:284–290
Potok PS, Hopper KD, Umlauf MJ (1995) Fractures of the acetabulum: imaging, classification, and understanding. Radiographics 15:7–23
Durkee NJ, Jacobson J, Jamadar D, Karunakar MA, Morag Y, Hayes C (2006) Classification of common acetabular fractures: radiographic and CT appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:915–925
Sen RK, Veerappa LA (2009) Long-term outcome of conservatively managed displaced acetabular fractures. J Trauma 67:155–159
Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, Hendricks P (1986) Fractures of the acetabulum: a retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:230–241
Kumar A, Shah NA, Kershaw SA, Clayson AD (2005) Operative management of acetabular fractures. A review of 73 fractures. Injury 36:605–612
Giannoudis PV, Nikolaou VS (2008) Surgical techniques–How do I do it? Open reduction and internal fixation of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. Injury 39:1113–1118
Giannoudis PV, Kanakaris NK, Dimitriou R, Mallina R, Smith RM (2011) The surgical treatment of anterior column and anterior wall acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:970–974
Briffa N, Pearce R, Hill AM, Bircher M (2011) Outcomes of acetabular fracture fixation with ten years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:229–236
Mears DC, Velyvis JH, Chang CP (2003) Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:173–186
Matta JM (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1632–1645
Giannoudis PV, Grotz MRW, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H (2005) Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:2–9
Moed BR, Willson Carr SE, Watson JT (2002) Results of operative treatment of fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:752–758
Murphy D, Kaliszer M, Rice J, McElwain JP (2003) Outcome after acetabular fracture: prognostic factors and their inter-relationships. Injury 34:512–517
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zamora-Carrera, E., Rubio-Suárez, J.C. (2014). Complex Fractures of the Acetabulum. In: Rodríguez-Merchán, E., Rubio-Suárez, J. (eds) Complex Fractures of the Limbs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04441-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04441-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04440-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04441-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)