Skip to main content

Matching of Images of Non-planar Objects with View Synthesis

  • Conference paper
SOFSEM 2014: Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8327))

  • 1459 Accesses

Abstract

We explore the performance of the recently proposed two-view image matching algorithms using affine view synthesis – ASIFT (Morel and Yu, 2009) [14] and MODS (Mishkin, Perdoch and Matas, 2013) [10] on images of objects that do not have significant local texture and that are locally not well approximated by planes.

Experiments show that view synthesis improves matching results on images of such objects, but the number of ”useful” synthetic views is lower than for planar objects matching. The best detector for matching images of 3D objects is the Hessian-Affine in the Sparse configuration. The iterative MODS matcher performs comparably confirming it is a robust, generic method for two view matching that performs well for different types of scenes and a wide range of viewing conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chum, O., Werner, T., Matas, J.: Two-view geometry estimation unaffected by a dominant plane. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2005), vol. 01, pp. 772–779. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Dahl, A.L., Aanaes, H., Pedersen, K.S.: Finding the best feature detector-descriptor combination. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on 3D Imaging, Modeling, Processing, Visualization and Transmission, 3DIMPVT 2011, pp. 318–325. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartley, R.I., Zisserman, A.: Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lebeda, K., Matas, J., Chum, O.: Fixing the Locally Optimized RANSAC. In: Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, pp. 1013–1023 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lepetit, V., Fua, P.: Keypoint recognition using randomized trees. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 28(9), 1465–1479 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowe, D.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vision 20, 91–110 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matas, J., Chum, O., Urban, M., Pajdla, T.: Robust wide baseline stereo from maximally stable extrema regions. In: Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, pp. 384–393 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mikolajczyk, K., Tuytelaars, T., Schmid, C., Zisserman, A., Matas, J., Schaffalitzky, F., Kadir, T., Gool, L.V.: A comparison of affine region detectors. Int. J. Comput. Vision 65(1-2), 43–72 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mikolajczyk, K., Schmid, C.: Scale & affine invariant interest point detectors. Int. J. Comput. Vision 60, 63–86 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mishkin, D., Perdoch, M., Matas, J.: Two-view matching with view synthesis revisited. In: Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Image and Vision Computing, New Zealand (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moisan, L., Stival, B.: A probabilistic criterion to detect rigid point matches between two images and estimate the fundamental matrix. Int. J. Comput. Vision 57(3), 201–218 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreels, P., Perona, P.: Evaluation of features detectors and descriptors based on 3d objects. In: Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 800–807 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moreels, P., Perona, P.: Evaluation of features detectors and descriptors based on 3d objects. Int. J. Comput. Vision 73(3), 263–284 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Morel, J.M., Yu, G.: ASIFT: A new framework for fully affine invariant image comparison. SIAM J. Img. Sci. 2(2), 438–469 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Muja, M., Lowe, D.: Fast approximate nearest neighbors with automatic algorithm configuration. In: VISAPP International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications, pp. 331–340 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mishkin, D., Matas, J. (2014). Matching of Images of Non-planar Objects with View Synthesis. In: Geffert, V., Preneel, B., Rovan, B., Štuller, J., Tjoa, A.M. (eds) SOFSEM 2014: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8327. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04298-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04298-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04297-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04298-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics