Abstract
We explore a family of supraclassical consequence relations obtained by varying the criteria according to which counterexamples to classical entailment may be deemed tolerable. This provides a different perspective on the rational consequence relations of nonmonotonic logic, as well as introducing new kinds of entailment with a diversity of potential contextual applications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Britz, K., Heidema, J., Labuschagne, W.: Semantics for dual preferential entailment. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38, 433–446 (2009)
Britz, K., Heidema, J., Varzinczak, I.: Constrained consequence. Logica Universalis 5, 327–350 (2011)
Freund, M.: On the notion of concept I. Artificial Intelligence 172, 570–590 (2008)
Freund, M.: On the notion of concept II. Artificial Intelligence 173, 167–179 (2009)
Hauser, N., Kloesel, C.: The Essential Peirce, vol. 1, pp. 1867–1893. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1992)
Hauser, N., Kloesel, C.: The Essential Peirce, vol. 2, pp. 1893–1913. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1998)
Johnson-Laird, P.: Mental Models. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1983)
Kraus, S., Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence 44, 167–207 (1990)
Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: What does a conditional knowledge base entail? Artificial Intelligence 55, 1–60 (1992)
Rodrigues, C.T.: The method of scientific discovery in Peirce’s philosophy: Deduction, induction, and abduction. Logica Universalis 5, 127–164 (2011)
Shoham, Y.: Reasoning about change: Time and causation from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)
van Benthem, J.: Logic and reasoning: Do the facts matter? Studia Logica 88, 67–84 (2008)
Zhang, D., et al.: Nonmonotonic reasoning and multiple belief revision. In: Proceedings IJCAI 1997, vol. 1, pp. 95–100. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Labuschagne, W., Heidema, J., Britz, K. (2013). Supraclassical Consequence Relations. In: Cranefield, S., Nayak, A. (eds) AI 2013: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8272. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03680-9_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03680-9_34
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03679-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03680-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)