Abstract
The government of Turkey undertook comprehensive public administration reforms in the first decade of the twenty-first century. These reforms were a new phase in the long history of the public administration reforms in this country. The reforms of the early 2000s were more comprehensive than their predecessors. In this latest phase, the government undertook both “managerial reforms” (improving the efficiency and effectiveness of public service delivery and adopting businesslike management techniques) and “governance reforms” (improving transparency, accountability, and responsiveness in public service delivery and citizen engagement in them) (Sözen 2012, p. 168). In this chapter we discuss the historical background and contents of these reforms and assess their effectiveness, particularly in two areas: citizen engagement in governance and reducing corruption.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The UNDP (n.d.) specifically identifies the following as its “focus areas” in its activities to promote democratic governance: access to information and e-governance, access to justice and rule of law, civic engagement, anti-corruption measures, fair electoral systems and processes, protections of human rights, mechanisms of participation in local governance and local development, parliamentary development, transparency, accountable and responsive public administration, and women’s empowerment. Similarly, the World Bank (n.d.) cites the following as the dimensions of governance: voice and accountability, political stability and absence of violence, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and control of corruption.
- 2.
TI’s website emphasizes that the CPI is a composite index of the measures of perception by multiple reputable sources and that these measures are the most valid ways of assessing corruption in countries (http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2012/in_detail/#myAnchor2).
- 3.
References
34 Sent to Court for Exam Cheating Claims (2012) Hürriyet Daily News. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/34-sent-to-court-for-exam-cheating-claims.aspx?pageID=238&nid=25188. Accessed 28 Dec 2012
Acar M, Emek U (2008) Building a clean government in Turkey: pillars, perils, and prospects. Crime Law Soc Change 49:185–203
Adaman F, Çarkoğlu A, Şenatalar B (2009) Hane halkı gözünden kamu hizmetleri ve yolsuzluk (public services and corruption from the perspectives of households). TEPAVYayınları, 43. http://www.tepav.org.tr/tur/admin/dosyabul/upload/kamuhizmetleri.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Ahmad F (1993) The making of modern Turkey. Routledge, London
AK Party solidly against corruption (2001) Hürriyet Daily News. http://newadmin.hurriyetdailynews.com/ak-party-solidly-against-corruption.aspx?pageID=438&n=ak-party-solidly-against-corruption-2001-09-04. Accessed 28 Dec 2012
Ateş H (2004) Management as an agent of cultural change in the Turkish public sector. J Publ Admin Res Theor 14:33–58
Ateş H (2012) Ethical perceptions of public-sector employees and citizens and their impact upon attitudes against unethical behavior. Turk Stud 13:27–44
Ateş H, Güloğlu T, Es M (2012) The reasons for unethical behavior in the Turkish custom services from employees’ and citizens’ points of view. Turk Stud 13:67–84
Bedirhanoğlu P (2007) The neoliberal discourse on corruption as a means of consent building: reflections from post-crisis Turkey. Third World Q 28:1239–1254
Bevir M (2010) Democratic governance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Blaser N (2012) Minister confesses to TOKI fraud in govt’s biggest corruption scandal yet. Today’s Zaman. http://www.todayszaman.com/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?newsId=299126;accessedon. Accessed 28 Dec 2012
Board of Review of Right to Information (2004) Activity report. http://www.bedk.gov.tr/genel-raporlar.aspx. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Board of Review of Right to Information (2005) Activity report. http://www.bedk.gov.tr/genel-raporlar.aspx. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Board of Review of Right to Information (2006) Activity report. http://www.bedk.gov.tr/genel-raporlar.aspx. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Board of Review of Right to Information (2007) Activity report. http://www.bedk.gov.tr/genel-raporlar.aspx. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Board of Review of Right to Information (2008) Activity report. http://www.bedk.gov.tr/genel-raporlar.aspx. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Board of Review of Right to Information (2009) Activity report. http://www.bedk.gov.tr/genel-raporlar.aspx. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Board of Review of Right to Information (2010) Activity report. http://www.bedk.gov.tr/genel-raporlar.aspx. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Board of Review of Right to Information (2011) Activity report. http://www.bedk.gov.tr/genel-raporlar.aspx. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Dinçer Ö, Yılmaz C (2003) Değişimin yönetimi için yönetimde değişim (change in administration to manage change). BaşbakanlıkYayını, Ankara
Emre C, Hazama Y, Mutlu S (2003) Cultural values, morality and public administration in Turkey. In: Emre C (ed) Yönetim bilimi yazıları (essays on administrative science). İmajYayıncılık, Ankara, pp 433–454
Eryılmaz B (2006) Tanzimat ve yönetimde modernleşme (Tanzimat and modernization of administration). İşaretYayınları, İstanbul
Eryılmaz B (2008) Bürokrasi ve siyaset (bureaucracy and politics), 3rd edn. Alfa Yayınları, İstanbul
European Commission (2010) Turkey progress report. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2010/package/tr_rapport_2010_en.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2012
European Commission (2011) Turkey progress report. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2011/package/tr_rapport_2011_en.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2012
European Commission (2012) Turkey progress report. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2012/package/tr_rapport_2012_en.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2012
Fenger M, Bekkers V (2007) The governance concept in public administration. In: Bekkers V, Dijkstra G, Edwards A, Fenger M (eds) Governance and the democratic deficit: assessing the democratic legitimacy of governance practices. Ashgate Publishing, Burlington, pp 13–34
Görmez K, Altan M, Altan Ş, Özkan HS, Güleç S, Eralp A, Parıltı C (2009) Etik, kültür ve toplum: Yolsuzluğun önlenmesi için etik projesi akademik araştırma çalışması (ethical culture and society: academic project on prevention of corruption through ethics). http://www.etik.gov.tr/BilgiBankasi.aspx?id=1. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Heper M (1985) The state tradition in Turkey. Eothen Press, Tallahassee, FL
Kalağan G (2010) Cumhuriyet dönemi Türk kamu bürokrasisinde yeniden yapılanma ve yönetsel reform çalışmaları (studies on restructuring and administrative reform in Turkish public bureaucracy in the Republican era). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi 2:65–84
Kapucu N (2010) Governance reforms: comparative perspective. USAK Publications, Ankara
Karaer T (1987) Kamu yönetimini yeniden düzenleme girişimleri ve sonuçları üzerine bir deneme (essay on the initiatives to reform public administration). Amme İdaresi Dergisi 20(2):25–46
Kılınç G, Özgür H, Genç FN (2012) The possible sources of ethical issues in urban/physical planning in Turkey. Turk Stud 13(1):45–65
Kuyaksil A (1994) Türkiye’de yönetimi yeniden düzenleme çalışmaları: Çokpartili dönem (1945–1963) (initiatives to reform the administration in Turkey: the multi-party era (1945–1963)). Der Kitabevi, İstanbul
Lessons from Georgia’s Fight against Graft (2012) The Economist. http://www.economist.com/blogs/easternapproaches/2012/02/tbilisi’s-corruption-busters. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Mousseau DY (2012) Is Turkey democratizing with EU reforms? An assessment of human rights, corruption and socio-economic conditions. SE Eur Black Sea Stud 12(1):63–80
Ömürgönülşen U, Doig A (2012) Why the gap? Turkey, EU accession, corruption and culture. Turk Stud 13(1):7–25
Ömürgönülşen U, Öktem MK (2006) Towards an understanding of the cultural pillars of ethical administration in Turkey: a qualitative research endeavor. Paper Presented at the EGPA Annual Conference, Milan, Italy
Özbudun E (1976) Social change and political participation in Turkey. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Pollitt C, Bouckaert G (2011) Public management reform: a comparative analysis—new public management, governance and the Neo-Weberian state, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Prime Ministry (2008) Performance reports. www.basbakanlik.gov.tr/Handlers/FileHandler.ashx?FileId=7986. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Prime Ministry (2009) Performance reports. www.basbakanlik.gov.tr/Handlers/FileHandler.ashx?FileId=7986. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Prime Ministry (2010) Performance reports. www.basbakanlik.gov.tr/Handlers/FileHandler.ashx?FileId=7986. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Prime Ministry (2011) Performance reports. www.basbakanlik.gov.tr/Handlers/FileHandler.ashx?FileId=16110. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
Prime Ministry (n.d.) 5176 sayılı Kamu Görevlileri Etik Kurulu kurulması ve bazı kanunlarda değisiklik yapılması hakkında kanun (the act to create the Council of Ethics for Public Service and to amend provisions in some other acts). www.basbakanlik.gov.tr/etik/5176sayili.html Accessed 1 Dec 2013
Program of the 58th Government of the Republic of Turkey (2002) http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/hukumetler/HP58.htm. Accessed 20 Nov 2012
Puppo L (2010) Anti-corruption interventions in Georgia. Global Crime 11(2):220–236
Sözen S (2012) Recent administrative reforms in Turkey: a preliminary assessment. Int J Bus Soc Sci 3:168–173
Sur H, Cekin MD (2012) Ethical conduct in health services in Turkey. Turk Stud 13(1):85–99
Sürgit K (1972) Türkiye’d eidari reform (administrative reform in Turkey). TODAİE Yayınları, Ankara
Sözüdoğru E (1996) Bürokrasi (Bureaucracy). Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türkiye Ansiklopedisi İletisim Yayınları 11:178–182
TODAİE (1992) Kamu yönetimi araştırması (research on public administration). TODAİE Yayınları, Ankara
Transparency International (n.d.-a) Global corruption barometer. http://archive.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/gcb. Accessed 1 Dec 2013
Transparency International (n.d.-b) Corruption perceptions index reports, 1998–2011. http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview;accessed. Accessed 2 Dec 2013
Turan İ (1984) Continuity and change in Turkish bureaucracy: the Kemalist period and after. In: Landau JM (ed) Atatürk and the modernization of Turkey. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 99–124
TUSİAD (2002) Kamu reform uaraştırması (Yayın No: TUSIAD-T/2002-12/335) (research on public reforms (Publication No: TUSIAD-T/2002-12/335)). TUSİAD Yayınları, İstanbul
UNDP (n.d.) Democratic governance: focus areas. http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/democraticgovernance/focus_areas/. Accessed 2 Dec 2013
Usul AR (2011) Democracy in Turkey: the impact of EU political conditionality. Routledge, New York
Van Kerserbergen K, Van Waarden F (2004) Governanceâ as a bridge between disciplines: cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. Eur J Polit Res 43(2):143–171
World Bank (n.d.) Worldwide governance indicators. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.asp. Accessed 2 Dec 2013
Yayman H (2008) Türkiye’nin idari reform tarihi (the history of administrative reforms in Turkey). Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Köseoğlu, Ö., Morçöl, G. (2014). Democratization of Governance in Turkey: An Assessment of the Administrative Reforms in the 2000s. In: Mudacumura, G., Morçöl, G. (eds) Challenges to Democratic Governance in Developing Countries. Public Administration, Governance and Globalization, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03143-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03143-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03142-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03143-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)