Skip to main content

Communicating Research at International Conferences: A Multimodal Analysis of an Intercultural or a Disciplinary Specific Genre?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Occupying Niches: Interculturality, Cross-culturality and Aculturality in Academic Research

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

  • 903 Accesses

Abstract

In this study we set out to explore how successful academic speakers, who use English as an additional language (EAL), combine “modes”, that is ways of representing and communicating meaning, such as speech, body language, written texts and non-verbal materials, in their oral paper presentations at international conferences. This combination of several semiotic modes in the design of a semiotic product or event as defined by Kress and Leeuwen (2001: 20) is called “multimodality”. To determine how effective presenters combine modes, we analysed the multimodal discourse of four 20-min talks, two from the social sciences and two from the technical sciences, which had been highly rated by academic peers. In addition, the speakers were interviewed to gather insight as to whether paper conferences are intercultural or discipline specific genres. The results of this qualitative study lend support to the hypothesis that effective speakers at academic conferences tend to use a variety of modes either simultaneously or consecutively to convey specific meanings. In so far as the question of whether oral presentations may be considered intercultural or discipline specific genres, it appears to be that in some social sciences presentations at international conferences are intercultural genres, whereas in some technical sciences they are discipline specific genres. Nevertheless, the pervasive use of technology and the growing use of EAL may, in time, lead many of the fields of both hard and soft sciences to have a discipline specific academic presentation genre. These findings, although limited, can be helpful for devising strategies that academics, especially those who use EAL, should keep in mind when preparing and carrying out oral presentations for international audiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2004). Interactive discourse structuring in L2 guest lectures: Some insights from a comparative corpus-based study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of national discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807–1825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, J. (Ed.). (1994). Academic listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hincks, R. (2005). Measures and perceptions of liveliness in student oral presentation speech: A proposal for an automatic feedback mechanism. System, 33, 575–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, S., & Forey, G. (2005). Introducing a conference paper: Getting interpersonal with your audience. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, P., & Scollon, R. (2003). Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, T. (2011). Academic listening in the 21st century: Reviewing a decade of research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(2), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauranen, A. (1996). Discourse competence–evidence from the thematic development in native and non-native texts. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 195–230). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morell, T. (2004). Interactive discourse for university EFL students. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morell, T. (2007a). What enhances EFL students’ participation in lecture discourse? Student, lecturer and discourse perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 222–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morell, T. (2007b). La difusión oral del conocimiento: las clases magistrales y las ponencias en congresos. In E. Alcaraz, J. Mateo & F. Yus (Eds.), Las lenguas profesionales y académicas (pp. 247–258). Barcelona: Ariel Lenguas Modernas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morell, T. (2007c). A presentation course design for academics of English as an additional language: A multimodal approach. In S. Burgess & P. Martín Martín (Eds.), English as an additional language in research publication and communication (pp. 237–253). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morell, T., García, M., & Sánchez, I. (2008). Multimodal strategies for effective academic presentations in English for non-native speakers. In R. Monroy & A. Sanchez (Eds.), 25 years of applied linguistics in Spain: Milestones and challenges (pp. 557–568). Editum: Universidad de Murcia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morell, T. (2009). ¿Cómo podemos fomentar la participación en nuestras clases universitarias? Alcoy: Editorial Marfil. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/13072.

  • Miller, L. (2002). Towards a model of lecturing in a second language. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2002). Visual discourse in scientific conference papers: A genre based study. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. (2003). Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signalling of organisation in academic lectures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventola, E., Shalom, C., & Thompson, S. (Eds.). (2002). The language of conferencing. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, P. (2005). Interactive features in medical conference monologues. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 157–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, L. (1990). Language as behaviour, language as code. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Morell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morell, T. (2014). Communicating Research at International Conferences: A Multimodal Analysis of an Intercultural or a Disciplinary Specific Genre?. In: Łyda, A., Warchał, K. (eds) Occupying Niches: Interculturality, Cross-culturality and Aculturality in Academic Research. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02526-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics