Skip to main content

Academic Literacies in Theory and Practice

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Literacies and Language Education

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((ELE))

  • 213 Accesses

Abstract

The term “academic literacies” provides a way of understanding student writing, which highlights the relationship between language and learning in higher education. It draws upon applied linguistics and social anthropology for its theoretical framing and its orientation toward the social, cultural, and contextualized nature of writing in the university. The work on academic literacies sits broadly within a body of research called New Literacy Studies (NLS), which takes a social and cultural approach to writing, in contrast to more cognitive perspectives. The use of the plural form, “literacies,” signals a concern with literacy as a range of social and cultural practices around reading and writing in particular contexts, rather than individual cognitive activity. Research findings suggest that in order to understand more about student writing, it is necessary to start from the position that literacy is not a unitary skill that can be transferred with ease from context to context. The research points to the requirement for students to switch between many different types of written text, as they encounter new modules or courses and the writing demands of different disciplinary genres, departments, and academic staff. It has unpacked this diversity primarily through ethnographic-type qualitative case study research, looking at students’ and faculty experiences of writing for assessment and the gaps between their expectations of the requirements of writing. In foregrounding the relationship between writing and learning, writing is conceptualized in terms of epistemology – rather than cognitive skill – and what counts as knowledge in the different contexts of the academy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ballard, B., & Clanchy, J. (1988). Literacy in the university: An ‘anthropological’ approach. In G. Taylor, B. Ballard, V. Beasley, H. K. Bock, J. Clanchy, & P. Nightingale (Eds.), Literacy by degrees. Milton Keynes: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomae, D. (1986). Inventing the university. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can’t write: Studies in writer’s block and other composing-process problems. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baynham, M. (2000). Academic writing in new and emergent discipline areas. In M. R. Lea & B. Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 17–31). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizzell, P. (1982). Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. Pre Text, 3(3), 213–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creme, P. (2000). The ‘personal’ in university writing: Uses of reflective learning journals. In M. R. Lea & B. Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 97–111). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creme, P., & Cowan, J. (2005). Peer assessment or peer engagement? Students as readers of their own work. Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences, 2(2), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, C., & Tomic, A. (1999). Inventing academic literacy: An American perspective. In C. Jones, J. Turner, & B. Street (Eds.), Students writing in the university: Cultural and epistemological issues (pp. 161–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow, R., Lea, M., Gonzalez, F., & Mason, R. (2001). Opportunity and e-quality: Intercultural and linguistic issues in global online learning. Distance Education, 22(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow, R., Morgan, M., Lea, M., & Pettit, J. (2004). Students’ writing in the virtual university: An investigation into the relation between online discussion and writing for assessment on two masters courses. In I. Snyder & C. Beavis (Eds.), Doing literacy online: Teaching, learning and playing in an electronic world. Hampton: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggis, T. (2003). Constructing images of ourselves? A critical investigation into ‘approaches to learning’ research in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hounsell, D. (1988). Towards an anatomy of academic discourse: Meaning and context in the undergraduate essay. In R. Saljo (Ed.), The written world: Studies in literate thought and action (pp. 161–177). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanič, R., & Lea, M. (2006). New contexts, new challenges: The teaching of writing in UK higher education. In L. Ganobcsik-Williams (Ed.), Teaching academic writing in UK higher education: Theories, practice and models. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Turner, J., & Street, B. (Eds.). (1999). Students writing in the university: Cultural and epistemological issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. V. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., Snyder, I., & Green, B. (2000). Teachers and techno-literacy: Managing literacy, technology and learning in schools. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of actor network science. http://ww.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/soc054jl.html. Retrieved 3 Feb 2006: Science Studies Centre, University of Lancaster.

  • Lea, M. R. (1994). “I thought I could write until I came here”: Student writing in higher education. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving student learning: Theory and practice (pp. 216–226). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M. R. (1998). Academic literacies and learning in higher education: Constructing knowledge through texts and experience. Studies in the Education of Adults, 30(2), 156–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M. R. (2004a). Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 739–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M. R. (2004b). The new literacy studies, ICTs and learning in higher education. In I. Snyder & C. Beavis (Eds.), Doing literacy online: Teaching, learning and playing in an electronic world (pp. 3–23). Hampton: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M. R. (2005). ‘Communities of practice in higher education’: Useful heuristic or educational model. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context (pp. 180–197). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M. R., & Stierer, B. (Eds.). (2000). Student writing in higher education: New contexts. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillis, T. (1997). New voices in academia? The regulative nature of academic writing conventions. Language and Education, 11(3), 182–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillis, T. (2003). Student writing as academic literacies: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and Education, 17(3), 192–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, J. (2002). Writing and revising the disciplines. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, L. (2004). Exploring literacy in social work education: A social practices approach to student writing. Journal of Social Work Education, 40(2), 785–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (Ed.). (2002). Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stierer, B. (2000). Schoolteachers as students: Academic literacy and the construction of professional knowledge within master’s courses in education. In M. R. Lea & B. Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 179–195). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1996). Academic literacies. In D. Baker, C. Fox, & J. Clay (Eds.), Challenging ways of knowing: Literacies, numeracy and sciences (pp. 101–134). Brighton: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1998). New literacies in theory and practice: What are the implications for language in education? Linguistics and Education, 10(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (2004). Academic literacies and the new orders: Implications for research and practice in student writing in higher education. Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences, 1(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thesen, L. (2001). Modes, literacies and power: A university case study. Language and Education, 15(2–3), 132–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary R. Lea .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lea, M.R. (2015). Academic Literacies in Theory and Practice. In: Street, B., May, S. (eds) Literacies and Language Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02321-2_19-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02321-2_19-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02321-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics