Abstract
This chapter explores critical approaches to online intercultural language education, also referred to as telecollaboration or online intercultural exchange. The origins of online intercultural language education lie in a critical view of the traditional language classroom. As the practice has evolved, several researchers have adopted a critical approach, questioning the many assumptions that have become ingrained in foreign and online intercultural language education. Major contributors have challenged notions such as intercultural learning being a natural outcome of online contact or the concept of a static, monolithic, national standard language as the target of language learners, whose ideal interlocutors are “native” speakers of this language and experts of its equally static culture. They have also unpacked conceptualizations of sociocultural competence and communicative language teaching as well as the notion that technology is merely a tool through which learners communicate. Recent work has looked, for example, at lingua franca exchanges, which challenge the power dynamics of traditional exchanges and offer a wider range of identities than the nonstandard, deficient communicator that the native speaker target implies. The ecologies of online intercultural language education and the mediating and shaping role of technology and its relations with society have also garnered interest recently. Problems and difficulties in the adoption of critical approaches include the reluctance of teachers to take a political stance and the need to constantly question one’s practice. The chapter concludes with reflections on preferred futures for online intercultural language education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akbari, R. (2008). Postmethod discourse and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 641–652.
Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60–81.
Block, D. (2002). ‘McCommunication’: A problem in the frame for SLA. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 117–133). London: Routledge.
Brammerts, H. (1996). Language learning in tandem using the Internet. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 121–130). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Cummins, J., & Sayers, D. (1995). Brave new schools: Challenging cultural illteratcies through global learning networks. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Davies, A. (2003). The native speakers: Myth and reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K., & Maillet, K. (2001). Giving a voice to the silent culture of language: The CULTURA project. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 55–102. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/furstenberg/default.pdf. Accessed 10 September 2016
Guth, S., Helm, F., & O’Dowd, R. (2012). University language classes collaborating online. A report on the integration of telecollaborative networks in European universities. Retrieved from http://intent-project.eu/sites/default/files/Telecollaboration_report_Final_Oct2012.pdf
Helm, F. (2015). The practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 197–217.
Helm, F., & Guth, S. (2010). The multifarious goals of telecollaboration 2.0: Theoretical and practical implications. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0: Languages, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century (pp. 69–106). Bern: Peter Lang.
Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Introduction: Theory and practice of networkbased language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kinginger, C., & Belz, J. (2005). Sociocultural perspectives on pragmatic development in foreign language learning: Case studies from telecollaboration and study abroad. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(4), 369–421.
Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 296–311.
Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 83–100). London: Routledge.
Kramsch, C. (2001). Intercultural communication. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (pp. 201–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kramsch, C. (2000). Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal 84(3), 311–326.
Lamy, M., & Goodfellow, R. (2010). Telecollaboration and learning 2.0. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0: Languages, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century (pp. 107–138). Bern: Peter Lang.
Lankshear, M., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, T., Chanier, T., & Youngs, B. (2011). Special issue commentary: Multilateral online exchanges for language and culture learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(1), 3–9. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2011/commentary.pdf. Accessed 10 September 2016
Malinowski, D., & Kramsch, C. (2014). The ambiguous world of heteroglossic computer-mediated language learning. In A. Blackledge & A. Creese (Eds.), Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy (pp. 155–179). New York: Springer.
Messina Dahlberg, G., & Bagga-Gupta, S. (2015). Learning on-the-go in institutional telecollaboration: Anthropological perspectives on the boundaries of digital spaces. In E. Dixon & M. Thomas (Eds.), Researching language learner interactions online: From social media to MOOCs, CALICO monograph series (Vol. 13, pp. 259–282). Texas: CALICO. Retrieved from http://calico.org/LearnerInteractionsOnline.pdf. Accessed 10 September 2016
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (Eds.). (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412–446.
O’Dowd, R. (2011). Online foreign language interaction: Moving from the periphery to the core of foreign language education? Language Teaching, 44(3), 368–380.
O’Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with ‘failed communication’ in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 61(2), 623–642.
Ortega, L., & Zyzik, E. (2008). Online interactions and L2 learning: Some ethical challenges for L2 researchers. In S. Magnan (Ed.), Mediating discourse online (pp. 331–355). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
Philippson, R. (2015). English as threat or opportunity in European higher education. In S. Dimova, A. K. Hultgren, & C. Jensen (Eds.), English-medium instruction in higher education in Europe (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Phipps, A., & Levine, G. S. (2010). What is language pedagogy for? In G. Levine & A. Phipps (Eds.), Critical and intercultural theory and language pedagogy (pp. 1–14). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Rampton, M. B. H. (1990). Displacing the ‘native speaker’: Expertise, affiliation and inheritance. ELT Journal, 44(2), 97–101.
Riel, M. (1993). Global education through learning circles. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), Global networks: Computers and international communication (pp. 221–236). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Savignon, S. J., & Sysoyev, P. V. (2002). Socio-cultural strategies for a dialogue of cultures. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 508–524.
Schneider, J., & von der Emde, S. (2006). Conflicts in cyberspace: From communication breakdown to intercultural dialogue in online collaborations. In J. A. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 178–206). Boston: Thomson Heinle.
Schnwienhorst, K. (2003). Neither here nor there? In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures. Language education perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Starfield, S. (2004). “Why does this feel empowering?”: Thesis writing, concordancing, and the corporatizing university. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp. 138–157). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/pdf/thorne.pdf. Accessed 10 September 2016
Thorne, S. L. (2006). Pedagogical and proxiological lessons from internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education research. In J. A. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 2–30). Boston: Thomson Heinle.
Thorne, S. L. (2016). Cultures-of-use and morphologies of communicative action. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 185–191. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june 2016/thorne.pdf. Accessed 10 September 2016
Thorne, S. L., Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2015). Technologies, identities, and expressive activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 215–233.
Train, R. (2006). A critical look at technologies and ideologies in internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. In J. A. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 247–284). Boston: Thomson Heinle.
Ware, P. D. (2005). “Missed” communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 64–89.
Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190–205.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Telecollaboration in foreign language learning. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Helm, F. (2017). Critical Approaches to Online Intercultural Language Education. In: Thorne, S., May, S. (eds) Language, Education and Technology. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02237-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02237-6_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02236-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02237-6
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education