Abstract
This chapter provides a critical review of flexicurity in the context of the Danish labour market. Shortly after flexicurity became a popular concept and a key policy issue in the European Union in the late 1990s, policy makers and labour market experts ‘discovered’ Denmark as a model country regarding flexicurity. Danish flexicurity was perceived as displaying a specific combination of low job security, a high compensation rate for unemployed persons and active labour market policies that could help people to move into new jobs. While the flexibility element of the hybrid termed ‘flexicurity’ is primarily an outcome of regulation determined by employers’ associations and trade unions in the comprehensive Danish collective bargaining system, the security part is mainly rooted in and maintained by the welfare state, not least through the unemployment insurance system. However, public interventions not only secure a basic level of economic and social security but are also geared towards maintaining a supply of labour that consists of persons who are prepared to be employed and work in a flexible labour market. The chapter analyses developments central to flexicurity over the last half century and concludes that the balance between flexibility and security has changed significantly towards more flexibility and less security.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnfred CE (2015) Så vil den danske model kollapse, Politiken, 20.08
Auer P (2000) Employment revival in Europe. ILO, Geneva
Bredgaard T, Larsen F, Madsen PK (2007) Flexicurity – afklaring af et begreb i bevægelse. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv 9(4):8–25
CASA (2015) Social Årsrapport 2015. CASA, Copenhagen
Council Directive 91/533/EC on an employer’s obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship
Council Directive 98/59/EC on the approximation of EU countries’ laws regarding collective redundancies
Dagpengekommissionen (2015) Nuværende finansieringskilder for dagpengesystemet. Beskæftigelsesministeriet, Copenhagen
Due J, Madsen JS, Jensen CS (1993) Den danske model. En historisk sociologisk analyse af det danske aftalesystem. Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, Copenhagen
Dunlop J (1958) Industrial relations systems. Holt, Rinehardt and Winston, New York
European Commission (1997) Green paper, partnership for a new organisation of work. Bulletin of the European Union. Supplement 4/97. Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg
European Commission (2016) Employment and social developments in Europe 2015. European Commission, Brussels
Galenson W (1952) The Danish System of Labor Relations – a study in industrial peace. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Ganssmann H (2000) Labour market flexibility, social protection and unemployment. Eur Soc 2(3):243–269
Hedborg A, Meidner R (1984) Folkhemsmodellen. Raben & Sjögren, Borås
Heyes J, Hastings T (2016) Where now for flexicurity? SPERI global political economy brief, no. 3, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
Hyman R (1975) Industrial relations – a Marxist introduction. Macmillan, London
Industriens Overenskomst 2014–2017 (2014) CO Industri & Dansk Industri, Copenhagen
Jensen CS (2007) Arbejdsmarkedsrelationer i Danmark – fra konfliktbaseret konsensus til konsensusbaseret konflikt. Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, Copenhagen
Knudsen H, Lind J (2012) Is the Danish model still a sacred cow? Danish Trade Unions and European Integration. Transfer 18(4):381–397
Kristiansen J (2014) Den kollektive arbejdsret. Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, Copenhagen
Larsson A (1998) Social policy and economic performance. In: Foden D, Morris P (eds) The search for equity. Lawrence and Wishart, London, pp 24–41
Lind J (1985) Arbejdsløshed og velfærdsstat. Aalborg Universitetsforlag, Aalborg
Lind J (2009) The end of the Ghent system as a trade union recruitment machinery? Ind Relat J 40(6):510–523
Marginson P, Sisson K (2004) European integration and industrial relations: multi-level governance in the making. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Møller IH, Lind J, Hansen H (2008) Aktivering. Disciplinering til arbejde. CASA og LEO, Copenhagen
OECD.Stat (2016a) http://stats.oecd.org/Labour/Labour Force Statistics/Job Tenure. Accessed 14 June 2016
OECD.Stat (2016b) http://stats.oecd.org/Labour/Labour Market Programmes/Public expenditure and participant stocks on LMP. Accessed 14 June 2016
Salamon M (1998) Industrial relations. Theory and practice. Prentice Hall, London
Standing G (1999) Gobal labour flexibility: seeking distributive justice. Macmillan, Basingstoke
Teknologisk Institut (2009) Succes med flexicurity. Teknologisk Institut, Copenhagen
Wilthagen T, Tros F (2004) The concept of ‘flexicurity’: a new approach to regulating employment and labour markets. Transfer 10(2):166–187
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knudsen, H., Lind, J. (2018). Danish Flexicurity: Not the Same Today as Yesterday. In: Sander, G., Tomljenović, V., Bodiroga-Vukobrat, N. (eds) Transnational, European, and National Labour Relations. Europeanization and Globalization, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02219-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02219-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02218-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02219-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)