Skip to main content

Developing a Self-optimizing Robotic Excavator System with Virtual Prototyping Technology

  • Conference paper
Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability
  • 4436 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays, a robotic excavator is widely applied in several fields of mining industry, agriculture, and forestry. Due to the complexity of dig environment such as slope of terrain profile, hardness of soil and unknown disturbances inside the soil, a versatile dig strategy avoiding obstacles has become a challenge to be addressed. This article presents an engineering model that describes the mechanical behavior of the robot excavators when it interacts with soil and generates an appropriate bucket path to adapt with each soil type, terrain profile and avoids buried obstacles as well. Based on a concept of the digging process, a robot excavator was designed in SOLIDWORKS and then exported to ADAMS environment. Whereas a soil model was modeled and analyzed by finite-element analysis (FEA) in ANSYS, then exported to ADAMS environment. The interactive simulation was implemented in ADAMS environment to investigate the dynamic behavior of robot and soil. Through the self-optimizing behavior of the robot in the digging process, an optimal bucket trajectory and an intelligent control strategy were generated in MATLAB/Simulink to control the robot tracking the desired bucket trajectory. The self-optimizing strategy was evaluated by effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in testing scenarios with many soil types and obstacles on the virtual prototype model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Park, H.-S., Le, N.-T.: Modeling and Controlling the Mobile Harbour Crane System with Virtual Prototyping Technology. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems 10(6), 1204–1214 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, S., Hong, D., Park, H., Bae, J.: Optimal Path Generation for Excavator with Neural Networks Based Soil Models. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, Seoul, Korea, pp. 632–637 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davoudi, S., Alimardani, R., Keyhani, A., Atarnejad, R.: A Two Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of a Plane Tillage Tool in Soil Using a Non-linear Elasto-Plastic Model. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci. 3(1818-6769), 498–505 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jafari, R.: Sensitivity analysis of factors affecting on finite element analysis in soil-tool interaction. In: Proceeding F-and-B 2008 Proceedings of the 1st WSEAS International Conference on Finite Differences - Finite Elements -Finite Volumes - Boundary Elements, pp. 122–127 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yousefi Moghaddam, R., Kotchon, A., Lipsett, M.G.: Method and apparatus for on-line estimation of soil parameters during excavation. Journal of Terramechanics 49(3-4), 173–181 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reece, A.: The Fundamental Equation of Earth Moving Mechanics (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tan, C.P., Zweiri, Y.H., Althoefer, K.A., Seneviratne, L.D.: Online Soil-bucket Interaction Identification for Autonomous Excavation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 3576–3581 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Althoefer, K., Tan, C.P., Zweiri, Y.H., Seneviratne, L.D.: Hybrid Soil Parameter Measurement and Estimation Scheme for Excavation Automation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 58(10), 3633–3641 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Patel, B.V.P., Prajapati, J.M., Gadhvi, B.J.: An excavation force calculations and applications: an analytical approach. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 3(5), 3831–3837 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Singh, S.S., Simmons, R.G.: Task Planning for Robotic Excavation. In: Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1284–1291 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Singh, S.: Developing Plans for Robotic Excavators, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, p. 15213 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Santos, M., Ha, Q.P., Rye, D.C., Durrant-Whyte, H.F.: Global control for robotic excavation using fuzzy logic and statecharts. In: Proceedings of the 17th ISARC, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 1–7 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, S.-U., Chang, P.H.: Control of a heavy-duty robotic excavator using time delay control with integral sliding surface. Control Engineering Practice 10(7), 697–711 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, S.-Y.Y., Jin, S.-M., Kwon, S.-K.: Remote Control System of Industrial Field Robot. In: IEEE International Conference onIndustrial Informatics, Daejeon, Korea, pp. 442–447 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, H., Liu, Y., Hasan, M.S.: Review of modeling and remote control for excavators. Int. J. Advanced Mechatronic System 2(1-2), 68–80 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alexandru, C., Pozna, C.: Dynamic modeling and control of the windshield wiper mechanisms. Journal WSEAS Transactions on Systems 8(7), 825–834 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mouazen, A.M., Ramon, H.: A numerical-statistical hybrid modeling scheme for evaluation of draught requirements of a subsoiler cutting a sandy loam soil, as affected by moisture content, bulk density and depth. Soil and Tillage Research 63(3-4), 155–165 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Koivo, A.J., Thoma, M., Kocaoglan, E., Andrade Cetto, J.: Modeling and control of excavator dynamics during digging operation. J. Aerosp. Eng. 9(1), 10–18 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ullman, D.G.: The mechanical design process. McGrow-Hill, Columbus (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alexandru, C., Pozna, C.: Dynamic modeling and control of the windshield wiper mechanisms. Journal WSEAS Transactions on Systems 8(7), 825–834 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Böcker, J., Schulz, B., Knoke, T., Fröhleke, N.: Self-Optimization as a Framework for Advanced Control Systems. In: IECON 2006 - 32nd Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics, pp. 4671–4675 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-Seok Park .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Park, HS., Le, NT. (2014). Developing a Self-optimizing Robotic Excavator System with Virtual Prototyping Technology. In: Zaeh, M. (eds) Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02054-9_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02054-9_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02053-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02054-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics