Abstract
To what extent has university service work changed in the US universities with the shift to the knowledge economy? In this chapter, we consider whether and the ways in which a new knowledge/learning regime in the USA is translating into new forms of service/outreach for faculty and universities. The chapter reports on findings from a research project on the changing nature of faculty work and service in the new global economy. Although there is evidence of the continued significance of longstanding conceptions of service, such as committee work in universities and professional organizations, there is also evidence of emergent forms of outreach and partnership that speak to the ways faculty and universities are developing new circuits of knowledge with new types of professional employees (non-tenure-track faculty) and organization (interstitial units) [see Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press]. One such type of activity, entrepreneurship, reflects a fee-for-service versus service-for-free model that has come with the market-like and market behaviors of increasingly academic capitalist universities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
2004 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF:04). (2005, May 26). Report on faculty and instructional staff in fall 2003. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2005172. Retrieved 22 Apr 2012.
American Association of University Professors (AAUP). (2012). Report of the committee on the economic status of the profession. Washington, DC: AAUP.
Antonio, A. L., Astin, H. S., & Cress, C. M. (2000). Community service in higher education: A look at the nation’s faculty. The Review of Higher Education, 23(4), 373–397.
Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU). (2012). http://www.aplu.org/page.aspx?pid=2185, Accessed 20 Dec 2012.
Baez, B. (2000). Race-related service and faculty of color: Conceptualizing critical agency in academe. Higher Education, 39(3), 363–391.
Bellas, M. L., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: Gender, race and family effects. The Review of Higher Education, 22(4), 367–390.
Bird, B. J., & Allen, D. N. (1989). Faculty entrepreneurship in research university environments. The Journal of Higher Education, 60(5), 583–596.
Blackburn, R. T., Bieber, J. P., Lawrence, J. H., & Trautvetter, L. (1991). Faculty at work: Focus on research, scholarship, and service. Research in Higher Education, 32(4), 385–413.
Boyer, E. L. (1995). The educated person. In J. A. Beane (Ed.), Toward a coherent curriculum: The 1995 ASCD yearbook. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Brazeau, G. A. (2003). Revisiting faculty service roles—Is “faculty service” a victim of the middle child syndrome? American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 67(3), 465–470.
Campbell, T. I. D., & Slaughter, S. (1999). Faculty and administrators’ attitudes toward potential conflicts of interest, commitment, and equity in university–industry relationships. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(3), 309–352.
Checkoway, B. (2001). Renewing the civic mission of the American research university. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 125–147.
DeAngelo, L., Hurtado, S., Kelly, K. R., Korn, W., Pryor, J. H., & Santos, J. L. (2012). The American college teacher: National norms for the 2007–2008 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles: UCLA Higher Education Research Institute.
Deil-Amen, R., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2004). Charter building and labor market contacts in two-year colleges. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 245–265.
Fairweather, J. S. (1993). Faculty reward structures: Toward institutional and professional homogenization. Research in Higher Education, 34(5), 603–623.
Fisher, D., & Atkinson-Grosjean, J. (2002). Brokers on the boundary: Academy–industry liaison in Canadian universities. Higher Education, 44, 449–467.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Gouldner, A. W. (1957). Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 281–306.
Holland, B. (1997). Analyzing institutional commitment to service: A model of key organizational factors. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4, 30–41.
Hollander, E., & Saltmarsh, J. (2000). The engaged University. Academe: Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors, July–August, 86(4): 29–32.
Kiyama, J. M., Lee, J. J., & Rhoades, G. (2012). A critical agency network model for building an integrated outreach program. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(2):276–303.
Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 441–456.
Lee, J. J. (2004). Comparing institutional relationships with academic departments: A study of five academic fields. Research in Higher Education, 45(6), 603–624.
Lee, J. J. (2007). The shaping of the departmental culture: Measuring the relative influences of the institution and discipline. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 41–55.
Lee, J. J., & Rhoads, R. A. (2004). Faculty entrepreneurialism and the challenge to undergraduate education at research universities. Research in Higher Education, 45(7), 739–760.
Lee, J. J., Cheslock, J., Maldonado-Maldonado, A., & Rhoades, G. (2005). Professors as knowledge workers in the new, global economy. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XX, pp. 55–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Lounder, A., Waugaman, C., Kenyon, M., Levine, A., Meekins, R., & O’Meara, K. (2011). Following the cuts: Effects of the recession on faculty careers and work lives. Liberal Education, 97(1), 20–29.
O’Meara, K. A. (2002a). Scholarship unbound: Assessing service as scholarship for promotion and tenure. New York: Routledge.
O’Meara, K. A. (2002b). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. The Review of Higher Education, 26(1), 57–80.
Rhoades, G. (2007). Making distinctive choices in intersecting markets: Seeking niches. In R. L. Geiger, C. L. Colbeck, R. L. Williams, & C. K. Anderson (Eds.), The future of the American Public Research University. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Riesman, D. (1959). Constraint and variety in American education. New York: Doubleday Anchor books.
Roper, C. D., & Hirth, M. A. (2005). A history of change in the third mission of higher education: The evolution of one-way service to interactive engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 10(3), 3–21.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state and higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2008). The academic capitalist knowledge/learning regime. In A. S. Chan & D. Fisher (Eds.), The exchange university: Corporatization of academic culture (pp. 19–48). Vancouver: UBC Press.
Tuchman, G. (2009). Wannabe U: Inside the corporate university. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 73–106.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, J.J., Torres-Olave, B., Kollasch, A., Rhoades, G. (2014). University Service: Conceptions and Enactments of University Service in the Knowledge Economy: Case Studies from STEM Faculty in the USA. In: Shin, J., Teichler, U. (eds) The Future of the Post-Massified University at the Crossroads. Knowledge Studies in Higher Education, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01523-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01523-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01522-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01523-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)