Skip to main content

Dyslexia in the European EFL Teacher Training Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

Dyslexia is a specific learning difficulty that has an effect not only on literacy skills in students’ first language, but also on foreign language learning (Sparks et al. 1989, 2006; Peer and Reid 2000; Schneider and Crombie 2003; Nijakowska 2008, 2010; Kormos and Smith 2012). In order to ensure that dyslexic students successfully acquire necessary levels of foreign language competence, they need adequate instruction and teachers’ support. However, frequently enough, EFL (English as a foreign language) teachers lack sufficient understanding of the nature of dyslexia and the difficulties it causes in foreign language learning. They are not familiar with the relevant teaching techniques and methods to further the language learning processes of students with dyslexia. It seems that more often than not it results from the lack of satisfactory training on dyslexia/learning differences during the course of studies as well as from the limited offer of courses for in-service teachers which would enable them to get qualifications (knowledge and skills) to teach foreign languages to dyslexic students with success. The chapter reviews the outcomes of a study whose aim was to identify the professional development needs of EFL teachers with regard to teaching dyslexic language learners. Data has been collected with the use of an online survey. The study has been conducted among the pre- and in-service EFL teachers mainly from six European countries where institutions participating in the DysTEFL project www.dystefl.eu are located. The findings of the present study indicate that the respondents perceived their knowledge and skills with regard to teaching dyslexic language learners as rather poor. They acknowledged the existence of the apparent gap in their training concerning this issue and expressed a well-defined need and interest in further professional development in this respect. In addition, they voiced their opinion and preferences as to the format, content matter as well as types of tasks and activities they would find most favourable in the training materials/course on the EFL and dyslexia. Thus, the immediate implications of the study refer to both the structure and content of the training materials/course for EFL teachers to be developed by the DysTEFL project consortium in response to the needs teachers articulated in the survey. More broadly, the findings seem relevant and informative for the higher education authorities and teacher training institutions responsible for designing professional training schemes for EFL pre- and in-service teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Overall means (M) are cited and discussed unless otherwise stated. Q2 M stands for the mean (M) for question 2. See Table 3 for means (M) and standard deviations (SD) for all questionnaire items—overall and according to teaching experience.

  2. 2.

    At the time when the present text was prepared for publication, the work on the DysTEFL course design was advanced. Three different formats have been prepared with a view to satisfy the needs and preferences of EFL teachers—face-to-face, Moodle and self-study. Drafts of course units are available at the project website (http://course.dystefl.eu/), their final versions will be accessible after the testing phase is completed.

References

  • Binks-Cantrell, E., R. M. Joshi and E. K. Washburn. 2012. Validation of an instrument for assessing teacher knowledge of basic language constructs of literacy. Annals of Dyslexia 62: 153–171. DOI 10.1007/s11881-012-0070-8.

  • Bogdanowicz, M. and H. Sayles. 2004. Rights of dyslexic children in Europe. Prawa uczniów z dysleksją w Europie. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Harmonia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, C., N. Mather, S. Dickson, B. Podhajski and D. Chard. 2001. Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia 51: 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S., M. Gillis, T. Smith, M. Lavalette, L. Liss-Bronstein and E. Lowe. 2009. First grade teachers’ knowledge of phonological awareness and code concepts: Examining gains from an intensive form of professional development and corresponding teacher attitudes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4: 425–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, F. 2004. Simple statistics. A course book for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., K. E. Perry, K. E. Stanovich and P. J. Stanovich. 2004. Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia 54: 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., J. Zibulsky, K. E. Stanovich and P. K. Stanovich. 2009. How teachers would spend their time teaching language arts: The mismatch between self-reported and best practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities 42: 418–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfus, C. 2012. Knowledge foundations for beginning reading teachers in EFL. Annals of Dyslexia 62: 204–221. DOI 10.1007/s11881-012-0073-5.

  • Hurry, J., T. Nunes, P. Bryant, U. Pretzlik, M. Parker, T. Curno and L. Midgley. 2005. Transforming research on morphology unto teacher practice. Research Papers in Education 20: 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Dyslexia Association. 2013. Dyslexia basics. http://www.interdys.org/ewebeditpro5/upload/Dyslexia_Basics_FS_-_final_81407.pdf. (retrieved April 1, 2013).

  • Joshi, R. M., E. Binks, L. Graham, E. Dean, D. Smith and R. Boulware-Gooden. 2009a. Do textbooks used in university reading education courses conform to the instructional recommendations of the National Reading Panel? Journal of Learning Disabilities 42: 458–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, R. M., E. Binks, M. Hougen, M. Dahlgren, E. Dean and D. Smith. 2009b. Why elementary teachers might be inadequately prepared to teach reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities 42: 392–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormos, J. and A. M. Smith. 2012. Teaching languages to students with specific learning differences. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. and V. W. Berninger. 1999. Those who know, teach well: Helping teachers master literacy-related subject-matter knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 14: 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., R. D. Abbott, L. B. Green, S. N. Beretvas, S. Cox, N. S. Potter, T. Quiroga and A. L. Gray. 2002a. Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities 35: 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., D. R. Harry, S. Cox, S. Sidman, A. E. Covill and A. Cunningham. 2002b. Reading teachers’ knowledge of children’s literature and English phonology. Annals of Dyslexia 52: 207–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., L. Green, R. D. Abbott and E. A. Sanders. 2009. Further evidence for teacher knowledge: Supporting struggling readers in grades three through five. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 22: 401–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. 1994. The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia 44: 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. and B. R. Foorman. 2003. Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia 53: 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. 2009. Knowledge foundations for teaching reading and spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 22: 379–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijakowska, J. 2008. An experiment with direct multisensory instruction in teaching word reading and spelling to Polish dyslexic learners of English. In Language learners with special needs: An international perspective, eds. J. Kormos and E. H. Kontra, 130–157. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijakowska, J. 2010. Dyslexia in the foreign language classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peer, L. and G. Reid. eds. 2000. Multilingualism, literacy and dyslexia: A challenge for educators. London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B. M., J. Clancy-Menchetti and C. J. Lonigan. 2008. Successful phonological awareness instruction with preschool children. Lessons from the classroom. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 28: 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podhajski, B., N. Mather, J. Nathan and J. Sammons. 2009. Professional development in scientifically based reading instruction: Teacher knowledge and reading outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities 42: 403–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, K. D. and J. L. Goeke. 2006. Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham based reading instruction: A review of literature. The Journal of Special Education 40: 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, E. and M. Crombie. 2003. Dyslexia and foreign language learning. London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seliger, H. and E. Shohamy. 1989. Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., L. Ganschow and J. Pohlman. 1989. Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia 39: 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., J. Patton, L. Ganschow, N. Humbach and J. Javorsky. 2006. Native language predictions of foreign language proficiency and foreign language aptitude. Annals of Dyslexia 56: 129–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear-Swerling, L. and E. Cheesman. 2012. Teachers’ knowledge base for implementing response-to-intervention models in reading. Reading and Writing 25: 1691–1723. DOI 10.1007/s11145-011-9338-3.

  • StatSoft, Inc. 2013. Electronic statistics textbook. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft. http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/ Retrieved April 1, 2013.

  • Washburn, E. K., R. M. Joshi and E. S. Binks-Cantrell. 2011a. Teacher knowledge of basic language concepts and dyslexia. Dyslexia 17: 165–183. DOI: 10.1002/dys.426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, E. K., R. M. Joshi and E. S. Binks-Cantrell. 2011b. Are preservice teachers prepared to teach struggling readers? Annals of Dyslexia 61: 21–43 DOI 10.1007/s11881-010-0040-y.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. DysTEFLDyslexia for teachers of English as a foreign language, www.dystefl.eu. Project-Number: 518466-LLP-1-2011-PL-COMENIUS-CMP.Grant agreement number: 2011-3631/001-001. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna Nijakowska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1. DysTEFL Needs Analysis Questionnaire

Appendix 1. DysTEFL Needs Analysis Questionnaire

Part A. Please tick the statement that describes you best. In some questions more than one answer is possible.

  1. 1.

    I teach at (more than one answer is possible)

    • primary school

    • lower-secondary school

    • upper-secondary school

    • college, university

    • language school

  2. 2.

    I have been teaching for

    • less than 2 years

    • 3–5 years

    • 6–10 years

    • more than 10 years

  3. 3.

    Most of my students are aged (more than one answer is possible)

    • up to 5 years

    • 6–10 years

    • 10–15 years

    • 15–19 years

    • 20+ years

  4. 4.

    I have taught/I am going to teach next year (more than one answer is possible)

    • classes where there are no students with dyslexia

    • classes where there are some students with dyslexia

    • special classes for students with dyslexia

    • classes with students who are exempted from assessment because they have dyslexia

    • one-to-one sessions for students with dyslexia

    • I do not yet know what classes I will teach next year

  5. 5.

    I teach in………………….. (please give the name of the country)

  6. 6.

    I am training to be a teacher in……………….. (please, give the name of the country)

Part B. Please consider a number of statements referring to working with dyslexic language learners.

Please, tick the most appropriate number on the scale, where

  • 1 = definitely not true of me

  • 2 = mostly not true of me

  • 3 = sometimes true and sometimes not true of me

  • 4 = mostly true of me

  • 5 = definitely true of me

No

Question

1

2

3

4

5

1

I often encounter dyslexic students in my daily work

     

2

I learnt about dyslexia during my studies at college/university/other teacher training institutions.

     

3

I have developed my own techniques for teaching English to dyslexic students.

     

4

I learnt about how to teach English to dyslexic students in my courses at college/university/teacher training institutions.

     

5

I feel the need for more information on the language teaching methods to be successfully applied with dyslexic students.

     

6

I am aware of the difficulties dyslexic language learners experience in learning English as a second/foreign language.

     

7

I can define the term’dyslexia’.

     

8

I can recognize a dyslexic student in my English language class.

     

9

I know how to develop learning strategies of my dyslexic students.

     

10

I know how to assess my dyslexic students.

     

11

If there were materials on the language teaching methods helping dyslexic students, I would read them.

     

12

I know what to do if I think that one of my students is dyslexic.

     

13

I do not assess the spelling of dyslexic students.

     

14

I provide extra time for dyslexic students to do a written task.

     

15

If it is necessary I assess my dyslexic.

     

16

I know how to apply the principles of multisensory teaching and learning.

     

17

I am familiar with the accommodations dyslexic students are entitled for in English language lessons.

     

18

I am familiar with the accommodations dyslexic students are entitled for at the national school leaving exams.

     

19

I am familiar with the accommodations dyslexic students are entitled in taking foreign language proficiency exams.

     

20

I am interested in further training in the area of teaching English to students with dyslexia.

     

Part C. Training needs. In this part of the questionnaire we are interested in what kind of training you would find useful to help you work with dyslexic language learners.

  1. 1.

    An ideal format of the course on dyslexia and methods of teaching a foreign language to children with specific learning difficulties is:

    • printed self-study materials

    • online learning course

    • online resources that I can use for self-study

    • face-to-face training workshop

  2. 2.

    In a training course on dyslexia I would like to learn about the following (please tick the topics you would find relevant; more than one answer is possible)

    • nature of dyslexia

    • learning difficulties associated with dyslexia

    • problems dyslexia causes in language learning

    • assessment of dyslexic learners in the language classroom

    • how dyslexia is diagnosed

    • accommodations dyslexic students are entitled to in high-stakes exams

    • language teaching techniques that assist dyslexic language learners

    • general teaching and classroom management tips for teaching dyslexic language learners

    • other topic (please indicate what other topics you would be interested in)

  3. 3.

    In a training course I would find the following useful (please tick the tasks and activities you would find relevant; more than one answer is possible)

    • brief lectures

    • reading articles

    • reading book chapters

    • reading online resource materials

    • watching videos of classrooms

    • listening to/reading interviews with dyslexic learners

    • listening to/reading interviews with teachers of dyslexic learners

    • learning how to design language teaching materials for dyslexic learners

    • evaluating language teaching materials designed for dyslexic learners

    • designing lesson plans for classes with dyslexic learners

    • evaluating lesson plans for classes with dyslexic learners

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nijakowska, J. (2014). Dyslexia in the European EFL Teacher Training Context. In: Pawlak, M., Aronin, L. (eds) Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01414-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics