Abstract
This paper reports an eye movement study and the effects of salience, context, and language dominance on the processing of idiomatic expressions by Spanish–English bilinguals. Salient meanings of figurative expressions are those which are processed first and accessed automatically from the mental lexicon, regardless of contextual bias (Giora 2003). The research conducted so far with second language (L2) learners and bilingual participants has shown that the literal meaning of L2 idioms might be more salient than the figurative one in the course of their processing by non-native language users (e.g. Kecskes 2000; Liontas 2002; Cieślicka 2006; Cieślicka and Heredia 2011). In addition, research findings suggest that the degree of language dominance, or which language is more readily accessible due to usage (Heredia 1997; Heredia and Altarriba 2001; Altarriba and Basnight-Brown 2007), might be a factor in bilingual processing. To investigate whether the degree of literal and figurative activation in bilingual idiom processing may be modulated by language dominance (i.e. dominant vs. nondominant), we recorded eye movements of Spanish–English bilinguals, dominant either in Spanish or in English, while they were reading ambiguous (literally plausible, such as ‘kick the bucket’) English idioms. Each idiom was used either in its figurative or literal meaning and embedded in a sentence with neutral preceding context, in which case its figurative (‘Within seconds she realized she was in deep water, and that she would very soon come to regret her words’) or literal (‘Within seconds she realized she was in deep water, and that she would very soon have to swim back towards the shore’) meaning became clear due to the subsequent disambiguating information, or the preceding supportive context clearly biasing one of the meanings (e.g. figurative biased: ‘Since both of us were equally guilty of causing the overspend, we both knew we were in deep water, and very likely to lose our jobs’). As predicted, the results indicated that the effects of salience and context on eye movement patterns are modulated by language dominance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abel, B. 2003. English idioms in the first language and second language lexicon: A dual representation approach. Second Language Research 19: 329–358.
Abutalebi, J., S. F. Cappa and D. Perani. 2001. The bilingual brain as revealed by functional neuroimaging. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4: 179–190.
Abutalebi, J., S. F. Cappa and D. Perani. 2005. What can functional neuroimaging tell us about the bilingual brain? In Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, eds. J. F. Kroll and A. M. B. De Groot, 497–515. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Abutalebi, J. and D. W. Green. 2007. Bilingual speech production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics 20: 242–275.
Alexander, R. J. 1991. Hopes and fears of a corpus linguist: Or the sad, but edifying tale of a corpus search for fixed expressions. Series A: General and Theoretical Papers 311: 1–15.
Altarriba, J. and D. M. Basnight-Brown. 2007. Methodological consideration in performing semantic-and translation-priming experiments across languages. Behavior Research Methods 39: 1–18.
Altenberg, B. 1998. On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word combinations. In Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications, ed. A. P. Cowie, 101–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cieślicka, A. 2006. Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by L2 speakers. Second Language Research 22: 115–144.
Cieślicka, A. 2007. Language experience and fixed expressions: Differences in the salience status of literal and figurative meanings of L1 and L2 idioms. In Collocations and idioms 1: Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes, Joensuu, Finland, eds. M. Nenonen and S. Niemi, 55–70. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.
Cieślicka, A. 2008. Hemispheric differences in processing salient and nonsalient meanings of L1 and L2 fixed expressions. In Lenguaje figurado y motivación: Una perspectiva desde la fraseología, ed. M. À. de la Granja,111–127. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Cieślicka, A. 2010. Formulaic language in L2: Storage, retrieval and production of idioms by second language learners In Cognitive processing in second language acquisition: Inside the learner’s mind, eds. M. Pütz and L. Sicola, 149–168. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cieślicka, A. B. 2012. Do nonnative language speakers chew the fat and spill the beans with different brain hemispheres?: Investigating idiom decomposability with the divided visual field paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. DOI 10.1007/s10936-012-9232-4.
Cieślicka, A. B. and R. R. Heredia. 2011. Hemispheric asymmetries in processing L1 and L2 idioms: Effects of salience and context. Brain and Language 116: 136–150.
Cieślicka, A, B., O’Rourke and D. Singleton. 2008. The processing of multi-word units: Evidence from readers’ eye movements. In Perspektywy glottodydaktyki i językoznawstwa. Tom jubileuszowy z okazji 70. urodzin Profesora Waldemara Pfeiffera, eds. K. Myczko, B. Skowronek and W. Zabrocki, 39–55. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Cieślicka, A. B., B. O’Rourke and D. Singleton. 2009. Salience or context in the processing of L1 and L2 multi-word units? In On language structure, acquisition and teaching: Studies in honour of Janusz Arabski on the occasion of His 70th birthday, ed. M. Wysocka 293–304. Katowice: University of Silesia Press.
Conklin, K. and N. Schmitt. 2008. Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics 29: 72–89.
Cutler, A. 1983. Lexical complexity and sentence processing. In The process of language understanding, eds. G. B. F. d’Arcais and R. J. Jarvella. New York: Wiley.
Dunn, A. L. and J. E. Fox Tree. 2009. A quick, gradient Bilingual Dominance Scale. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12: 273–289.
Gibbs, R. W., N. P. Nayak and C. Cutting. 1989. How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language 28: 576–593.
Gibbs, R. W. and N. P. Nayak. 1989. Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognitive Psychology 21: 100–138.
Giora, R. 1999. On the priority of salient meanings: studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 919–929.
Giora, R. 2002. Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics 34: 487–506.
Giora, R. 2003. On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heredia, R. R. 1997. Bilingual memory and hierarchical models: A case for language dominance. Current Directions in Psychological Science 6: 34-39.
Heredia, R. R. 2008. Mental models of bilingual memory. In An introduction to bilingualism: Principles and processes, eds. J. Altarriba and R. R. Heredia, 39-67. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heredia, R. R. and J. Altarriba. 2001. Bilingual language mixing: Why do bilinguals code-switch? Current Directions in Psychological Science 10: 164–168.
Heredia, R. R. and J. M. Brown. 2013. Bilingual memory. In The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism, eds. T. K. Bhatia and W. C. Ritchie, 269–291. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing LTD.
Heredia, R. R. and A. B. Cieślicka 2008. [Regression analyses on bilingual idiom norms from Titone and Connine’s 1994 descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions]. Unpublished data.
Heredia, R. R., O. García and M. R. Penecale. 2007. The comprehension of idiomatic expressions by Spanish-English bilinguals. Paper presented at the 48th annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Long Beach, CA.
Hernández, A. E. and K. J. Kohnert. 1999. Aging and language switching in bilinguals. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 6: 69–83.
Indefrey, P. 2006. A meta-analysis of hemodynamic studies on first and second language processing: Which differences can we trust and what do they mean? Language Learning 56: 279–304.
Jiang, N. and T. M. Nekrasowa. 2007. The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers. Modern Language Journal 91: 433–445.
Kecskes, I. 2000. A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 605–625.
Liontas, J. 2002. Context and idiom understanding in second languages. In EUROSLA Yearbook, 155–185. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Matlock, T. and R. R. Heredia. 2002. Understanding phrasal verbs in monolinguals and bilinguals. In Bilingual sentence processing, eds. R. R. Heredia and J. Altarriba, 251–274. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Meisel, J. M. 2007. The weaker language in early child bilingualism: Acquiring a first language as a second language? Applied Psycholinguistics 28: 495–514.
Nunberg, G., I. A. Sag and T. Wasow. 1994. Idioms. Language 70: 491–534.
Perani, D. and J. Abutalebi. 2005. The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15: 202–206.
Perani, D., J. Abutalebi, E. Paulesu, S. Brambati, P. Scifo and S. F. Cappa. 2003. The role of age of acquisition and language use in early, high-proficient bilinguals: An fMRI study during verbal fluency. Human Brain Mapping 19: 179–182.
Schmitt, N. and R. Carter. 2004. Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction. In Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use, ed. N. Schmitt, 1–22. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Schoonbaert, S., W. Duyck, M. Brysbaert and R. J. Hartsuiker. 2009. Semantic and translation priming from a first language to a second language and back: Making sense of findings. Memory and Cognition 37: 569–586.
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., K. Conklin and N. Schmitt. 2011 Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and nonnative speakers. Second Language Research 27: 251–272.
Spöttl, C. and M. McCarthy. 2004. Comparing knowledge of formulaic sequences across L1, L2, L3, and L4. In Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use, ed. N. Schmitt, 191–225. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Stowe, L. A. and L. Sabourn. 2005. Imaging the processing of a second language: Effects of maturation and proficiency on the neural processes involved. International Review of Applied Linguistics 43: 327–351.
Swinney, D. W. and A. Cutler. 1979. The access of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Behavior and Verbal Learning 18: 523–534.
Titone, D. A. and C. M. Connine. 1994. Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions: familiarity, compositionality, predictability, and literality. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 9: 247–270.
Titone, D. A. and C. M. Connine. 1999. On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1655–1674.
Underwood, G., N. Schmitt and A. Galpin, A. 2004. The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use, ed. N. Schmitt, 153–172. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Vaid, J. and D. G. Hall. 1991. Neuropsychological perspectives on bilingualism: Right, left, and center. In Bilingualism, multiculturalism, and second language learning: The McGill conference in honor of Wallace E. Lambert, ed. A. Reynolds, 81–112. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vaid, J. and R. Hull. 2002. Re-envisioning the bilingual brain using functional neuroimagining: Methodological and interpretive issues. In Advances in the neurolinguistics of bilingualism: A festschrift for Michel Paradis, ed. F. Fabbro, 315–355. Udine, Italy: Forum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cieślicka, A.B., Heredia, R.R., Olivares, M. (2014). It’s All in the Eyes: How Language Dominance, Salience, and Context Affect Eye Movements During Idiomatic Language Processing. In: Pawlak, M., Aronin, L. (eds) Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01414-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01414-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01413-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01414-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)